22 Reasons Why Starting World War 3 In The Middle East Is A Really Bad Idea

Tomahawk cruise missile

The following are 22 reasons why starting World War 3 in the Middle East is a really bad idea…

#1 The American people are overwhelmingly against going to war with Syria…

Americans strongly oppose U.S. intervention in Syria’s civil war and believe Washington should stay out of the conflict even if reports that Syria’s government used deadly chemicals to attack civilians are confirmed, a Reuters/Ipsos poll says.

About 60 percent of Americans surveyed said the United States should not intervene in Syria’s civil war, while just 9 percent thought President Barack Obama should act.

#2 At this point, a war in Syria is even more unpopular with the American people than Congress is.

#3 The Obama administration has not gotten approval to go to war with Syria from Congress as the U.S. Constitution requires.

#4 The United States does not have the approval of the United Nations to attack Syria and it is not going to be getting it.

#5 Syria has said that it will use “all means available” to defend itself if the United States attacks.  Would that include terror attacks in the United States itself?

More…

      
Plugin by: PHP Freelancer
This entry was posted in Editorial, War and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to 22 Reasons Why Starting World War 3 In The Middle East Is A Really Bad Idea

  1. Pingback: The Road to World War 3 | To tell the truth

Comments are closed.