Time to Fight Back

The information below comes directly from YouTube. My only original commentary was the title of the article. Did this “exercise” of free speech warrant physical action? At some point, we have to stop hanging our heads and appeasing attacks. We now see that hope is not enough and we must act before it is hopeless. We have to stop sparing the rod and spoiling the child across the entire spectrum. We have to hold our heads high and stand up for ourselves and principles when honor demands it.

The students’ point in attacking Israel and disrupting the meeting was Israeli apartheid policy? I would have liked for the students to be arrested and sentenced to one hour each with a holocaust survivor. We also have to ask where these “students” are getting their information and for what purpose.

For anyone who questions my position, click here.

David DeGerolamo

From YouTube:

On February 23rd during a public lecture by Nonie Darwish, members of the audience assaulted a number of UNM students. The public lecture, which began at 7PM in the Anthropology lecture hall, was attend by some UNM students who exercised their right to freedom of speech by vocally protesting the against the opinions put forward by Darwish. When the students raised their voices a number of audience members proceeded to get out of their seats and use force against the students. One of the students was hit in the face, another had her hair pulled, and many were pushed and shoved. One of the students caught much of these events on film before another audience member forcibly pushed down her camera. The students were then forced out of the auditorium and quickly called the UNM police who arrived and filed a report.

These students were assaulted on UNM campus for simply trying to make their voices heard and it is a shock that a non-violent action was met with such aggression.

STATEMENT FROM UNM STUDENTS FOR JUSTICE IN PALESTINE: SJP expresses gratitude to groups across the nation and the world who have shown their support for UNM Students for Justice in Palestine(SJP) and the students and members of (Un)Occupy Albuquerque who were brave enough to actively reject the normalization of Islamophobia and human rights violations.

Though SJP was not a part of the planning process, we fully support the Mic-Check of Nonie Darwish’s lecture, “Why the Arab Spring is failing and how Israel is involved.” Students and members of (Un)Occupy spoke up in solidarity with Palestine and against Islamophobic propaganda. We are appalled and disturbed by the physical assault by audience members on the peaceful activists. These actions are reflective of a growing trend of physical violence by people who deny Israeli’s illegal occupation of Palestinian land.

Despite the discouraging nature of a violent response to a non-violent demonstration, we will use this incident to shine a light on the persistent appropriation of Palestinian land and resources. SJP sincerely hopes that violent reactions like these will not be replicated during Israeli Apartheid Week or in any future actions in solidarity with the Palestinian people.

Again, we are grateful for the overwhelming national and international shows of support and enduring commitment to non-violent action.

With Love & Solidarity,
UNM Students for Justice in Palestine

STATEMENT FROM (Un)Occupy Albuquerque: Three people, including UNM students, were attacked by pro-Israeli members on Wednesday night for mic-checking Nonie Darwish, a self-proclaimed human rights activist who was on UNM campus to deliver a talk on the Arab Springs.

Darwish cast the Arab Spring in a bad light. She argued that democratic revolutions in the Middle East and North Africa, such as those in Egypt and Tunisia, would not succeed as long as Islamists controlled them.

A group of people, who were acting in solidarity with the Palestinian people, questioned Darwish’s fear-mongering and her unqualified support for Israel. They were shouted down by pro-Israel members in the audience, who assaulted a woman, pulled her hair, and forcibly pushed another person over a row of seats. A third person was punched in the face. Pro-Israel members also destroyed a phone that was used to record the assault.

The protestors, some of whom are UNM students and affiliated with the (Un)Occupy Albuquerque movement, used “mic-checking” as a nonviolent tactic to voice their concern against the Islamophobic content of Darwish’s talk. However, they were met with outright violence by members of the audience, who did not want to hear what the protestors had to say. Rather than simply wait for the protestors to deliver their message and leave, as has been the case at similar actions in other parts of the country, the pro-Israel audience members physically forced the protestors out of the auditorium.
It is interesting that the audience members who assaulted the protestors were acting in support of Israel, which claims to be the “most-democratic state” in the Middle East. Freedom of speech is an important part of being democratic, and it is a tragedy that the pro-Israel members did not want to hear what the protestors had to say.

      
Plugin by: PHP Freelancer
This entry was posted in Civil Unrest, Editorial and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Time to Fight Back

  1. Bret Kelly says:

    Freedom of speech is a cornerstone of our freedoms here in the USA, however what is not pointed out in the above video and article is that the students “mic-checking” the speaker were not exercising their right to free speech, but were instead trampling on the free speech of the speaker. There is nothing preventing them from having a similar forum to address any factual errors that Nonie Darwish may have had in her presentation, instead they chose to attempt to silence her. Does that justify violence? No. I do feel the frustration of her audience and other audiences across this country when they are there to hear what a speaker has to say and instead are treated to chanting rhetoric of those hypocrites who would silence free speech in the name of free speech.

  2. tmedlin says:

    Need to be sure I understand your position -- are you supporting the “rights” of those that were interfering with the “right” of the scheduled speaker to be heard, and the “right” of those in attendance to hear that speaker?

  3. tmedlin says:

    “These students were assaulted on UNM campus for simply trying to make their voices heard and it is a shock that a non-violent action was met with such aggression.”

    I disagree -- they were trying to PREVENT the scheduled speaker from being able to give her speech. Just because THEY wanted the podium, did NOT give them the right to silence the scheduled speaker. Sorry, David, I completely disagree with your assessment. What has happened, is the public has not responded to their marches, their “occupations”, their demonstrations, so the ratchetted things up a notch, to try to PROVOKE violence. THAT was more likely their primary intent, straight out of the Van Jones, Cloward-Piven playbook.

  4. tmedlin says:

    I hope this is simply a case of copy/paste, regarding the commentary about the video, and NOT the opinion of NCRenegade. Please clarify.

    • David says:

      The article above is directly from YouTube presented for commentary. I did not sign my name since I only presented the information. I will add a clarification at the top of the article.

  5. Michael Johnston says:

    There is no “Palestine” and all these bozo’s need to read history and find the first time it was mentioned. The spin message from the left is classic..

  6. bob clark says:

    it was a “scheduled” speaker on the agenda with an appointed time. Usually, each side gets their say and alternates in speaking in a debate , but this was not scheduled as a debate. Violence , or pushing, is not the answer BUT let the scheduled speaker finish as a polite mature adult human at a learning center and then take your turn to protest or speak. Oh, and what about the rights of the persons who were actually there and showed up to hear the speaker you people attempted to cut off ? Where are there rights or do only the protesters with the speeches on the little cards have rights ? Rights and responsibilities are 2 way streets people not just one way or the way of those holding the little cards to interrupt.

Leave a Reply