Why Reconstruction?

Since I have started speaking and writing on the topic of restoring our Republics, I have been finding that people are not seeing the significance in seeking adjudication upon the unconstitutionality of the Reconstruction Acts, and what exactly a success in this arena means. Nor are people grasping the concept and importance of participating in lawful government. Simply put: If the Reconstruction Acts were a good, a Constitutionally acceptable thing, then let them be declared so by a court of law, once and for all. It has never been done, and has been artfully and illegally avoided by all levels of government for 143 years! I do not believe that they are Constitutional, therefore, I am pursuing and participating in the Constitutional government of the 12th State of North-Carolina that was established in 1776, not the 39th Federal State of North Carolina that was unconstitutionally created through the Reconstruction Acts.

Again and again, people are shocked about the truth of what happened, they are intrigued or made indignant by the history that has been hidden from them; they struggle with the realization that they have believed a lie, but they fail to realize the significance and power that will be restored to “We the People” when these Acts are overturned.

I know that people are missing this because they are continuing to waste their time and energy upon governmental issues that have absolutely no force or effect in law. My meaning is not that the unconstitutional actions taken by the governments (local, state, federal) have no affect upon people’s lives – the ‘People’ are suffering under the burden of them. However, most believe there is only so much that we can do and our avenues for remedy are limited or non-existent. They are trapped in the endless cycle of 2 more years, 4 more years, 2 more years, 4 more years (or don’t participate at all) and tell each other, “Next election we will get the ‘right people’ in office to cure these problems…’they’ will fix what has been broken”.

The issue with believing that ‘something is broken’ and we just need to ‘fix’ it, is that no subsequent action taken after an unconstitutional act or fraud is in place can be cured. Nothing can be done besides redress and recession(check out the actual definition of this word). Meaning this: when an unconstitutional act is in place there is nothing that can be done, no one you can elect, no passage of time, and no amount of ignorant obeisance by the people that will make the act, or the actions based upon it, constitutional. It makes no difference how many people are willing to participate in it, it makes no difference that it is popularly supported. Thomas McIntyre Cooley’s book A treatise on the constitutional limitations which rest upon the legislative… goes into detail and explanation of this fundamental principle of jurisprudence.

In my post, A Question of Intent, the idea of overturning every Supreme Court decision made over the last one hundred (100) years (that has had a negative impact upon the original intent of the Constitution) can be accomplished in the overturning of this single Congressional Act. Patriot Act: gone, National Health Care: gone, NAFTA: gone, U.N. Agenda 21: gone, et.al… By the Reconstruction Acts being declared unconstitutional we can truly begin the process of restoring what was lost – a constitutional Union, constitutional state republics, a federal government bound, once again, in the chains of the Constitution for the United States of America (emphasis mine). Each state will, once again, have what was always intended: self-determination. The federal government will be confined to its enumerated powers.

We must comprehend the importance of participating in lawful government. The de jure has been re-established in the State of North-Carolina. There are thousands of public offices to be filled, for example: Wardens of the Poor, Justices of the Peace, Sheriffs, Rangers, the Militia rank and file, etc… These offices no longer exist under the de facto government, or are so fundamentally changed, that they no longer serve their intended purpose. There are de facto laws on the books that are constitutional, that are useful and applicable to our post-modern world. There are de jure laws that have not been touched or changed in 143 years and need to be brought up to date.

All of this must be done. A daunting task? Yes. But it can be done; it must be done if we truly and honestly desire freedom and liberty; if we truly desire to see the insanity stop.

Nationalized citizenship is void as an operation of law and every office and position held or created, by or through this nonexistent citizenship, is as if it never existed. How can something that does not exist in law, bring about lawful change? It cannot.

There are men and women who are holding these de facto offices that would, and could, help and aid this transition: Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Glen Bradley, and others who are constitutionally-minded men and women. However, they are still holding non-existent offices, held by an unconstitutional body politic; national citizenship (Federalist Papers #39 expounds upon this concept).

I have most likely raised even more questions in your minds, but this is good! When you walk away from reading this, and contemplate the questions that have formed, remember this: With the Reconstruction Acts declared void, every other act that followed it, and was built upon it, is as if it never existed! Clean slate, Constitution restored.

Isaac Hutchison

Original Post: http://restoreourrepublics.blogspot.com/2011/05/why-reconstruction.html

      
Plugin by: PHP Freelancer
This entry was posted in Editorial and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply