Are Social Networks Covered by the First Amendment?

Organizers of civil unrest around the world are using social networks to coordinate their efforts. This method was first used to organize protests in Iran and their success has led to its newest form of “organized riots” across England. Social networks have also been used in New York City and Philadelphia to coordinate attacks against rival gangs or innocent shoppers. New York City has announced the formation of a new police unit to monitor future social network events advocating “mayhem”.

Is it the responsibility of our government to monitor social media? The first amendment clarifies free speech but even the law prohibits shouting “fire” in a crowded theater. The simple solution would be to hold the appropriate social media network accountable for their published content. The first lawsuit against Facebook or Twitter for civil damages caused by civil unrest organized on their site will quickly stop future events from being published.

As usual, the government’s solution to a problem is to increase government. In any case, the authorities are addressing a real issue that was only a matter of time once social networks were formed. Since social networks communicate instantly, I suspect the result of this action will only be to reduce the notification timing of future events and/or the incorporation of coded locations. Remember, when seconds count, the police are only minutes away.

David DeGerolamo 

NYPD forms new social media unit to mine Facebook and Twitter for mayhem

The NYPD has formed a new unit to track troublemakers who announce plans or brag about their crimes on Twitter, MySpace and Facebook.

Newly named Assistant Commissioner Kevin O’Connor, one of the department’s online and gang gurus, has been put in charge of the new juvenile justice unit. He and his staff will mine social media, looking for info about troublesome house parties, gang showdowns and other potential mayhem, sources said.


Plugin by: PHP Freelancer
This entry was posted in Civil Unrest, Editorial and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Are Social Networks Covered by the First Amendment?

  1. Facebook is already engaging in censorship and harassment where it suits them.

    Facebook is censoring a Rush Limbaugh group by deleting over 57000 members. See screenshots. Do not think yourself above their censorship especially as the next big election approaches. They are just laying the foundation now.

    I have been receiving more harassment and threats by Facebook that are documented at

    Bro. Steve Winter

  2. sharon says:

    social media is just another to communicate and putting any restrictions on this would be wrong. Facebook is in Obama’s pocket already and it attacks groups -- most noted any conservative groups. It deletes as it see fit and won’t post if they don’t like it. Trust me people will find a way. If the president would stop his socialist communist ways monitoring would not be necessary at all. We are fed up with him and his policies and his gripe on the country. No, leave social media alone. We have the right to speak whether it is on facebook or twitter or anything. This is still America until the main nazi takes it over.

Comments are closed.