Although the following story is from England, the story could easily have taken place in the United States. Activist judges, a two tiered justice system, biased media and a sense that normal people deserve to be punished are part and parcel of our nation’s progressive turn to Socialism.
“Enough is enough” – Rising anger over court bias as Muslim racists swagger free from Leicester court
“Everywhere you look, there are signs that people are waking up and standing up to be counted. The anti-British bias of the media, legal system and the police is no longer a cause for despair but for mounting anger.”
This is Nick Griffin’s take on the public response to the shocking contrast between the case of Emma West, remanded in custody until the New Year due to a lie-fuelled Crown Prosecution Service bulldozer operation in court yesterday, and that of four Somalia Muslims who walked free from court in Leicester yesterday despite being found guilty of a brutal racist attack on a defenceless English girl.
The gang of Muslim women repeatedly kicked a young woman in the head, attacking her for no apparent reason, as she was heading home with her partner a court heard. These women screamed ‘kill the white slag’ while kicking 22-year-old Rhea Page, while she lay on the ground.
Ambaro and Hibo Maxamed, are both 24, their sister Ayan, is 28, and cousin Ifrah Nur, who is also 28. These are the women who attacked the care worker, as she was walking to a taxi rank with her boyfriend that night. These are not mere girls out of secondary school.
‘Kill the white slag’
They were charged with assault occasioning actual bodily harm, a charge which carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison. They called Miss Page a ‘white bitch’ and said ‘kill the white slag’ but have not been charged with a racially aggravated offence, as any white person would have been.
If the attackers had been English and the victim Somali the racial aspect of the assault would automatically have led to a harsher sentence.
But the racist Somali thugs were set free yesterday with suspended six month sentences. Judge Robert Brown ordered most of the gang to carry out 150 hours of unpaid work. One of the girls, because of a medical condition, received a four-month curfew between 9 pm and 6 am instead.
The defence in this case? Religion. These girls claimed their religion did not allow them to drink, so they were not used to being drunk. Therefore they were not responsible for their violent behaviour.
Obviously these four do not follow their religious doctrine. However that did not stop them from using their ‘religion’ as an excuse.
The Judge at Leicester Crown Court informed them that most people in their position would normally go to jail. So why did he allow these girls such leniency? Was it because he acting as an apologist for the crimes of these people?
Did those responsible show remorse? Judge for yourself. This is what one of them Ambaro Maxamed wrote on her Twitter account: “Happy happy happy!’, ‘I’m so going out’, and ‘Today has been such a great day’.”
The Somali women are Muslims. Their religion does not allow them to use alcohol, and yet that night they were drinking. The British National Party say that it is inexcusable that they can use their religion to evade responsibility for their hideous and violent actions against Rhea Page. What does their religion say about inflicting violence on an innocent person?
Nick Griffin, MEP commented:
“Our values are clear – that such a person must be punished. Yet our Judges and Political Class have perverted their morals to such a degree that even this basic tenet is not upheld. Think about this case and the many others where victims are not offered remedy or protection. Then think about what you can do to change this.”
“What would have happened to a group of British women if they had decided to jump on and kick to pieces a Somalia girl, screaming ‘Kill the Muslim slag’? They most definitely wouldn’t have been given suspended sentences.”