Brave New World: courtesy of Eric Holder. The pressure to destroy the American family structure has become a primary goal of this administration. What happens when the role of a mother and father joined in Holy Matrimony are redefined by the state? When a government that has become arrogant without constraint, we see the consequences at all levels of our life.
Is this Liberty? Marginalization of the family, which is the cornerstone of our republic’s future, is the last step to confiscating our children and placing them into learning centers. Glenn Beck’s vision for our children outlined in his book “Agenda 21” must not come to fruition.
The Obama Justice Department is arguing in the United States Supreme Court that children do not need mothers.
The Justice Department’s argument on the superfluity of motherhood is presented in a brief the Obama administration filed in the case of Hollingsworth v. Perry, which challenges the constitutionality of Proposition 8, the California ballot initiative that amended California’s Constitution to say that marriage involves only one man and one woman.
The Justice Department presented its conclusions about parenthood in rebutting an argument made by proponents of Proposition 8 that the traditional two-parent family, led by both a mother and a father, was the ideal place, determined even by nature itself, to raise a child.
The Obama administration argues this is not true. It argues that children need neither a father nor a mother and that having two fathers or two mothers is just as good as having one of each.
“The [California] Voter Guide arguably offered a distinct but related child-rearing justification for Proposition 8: ‘the best situation for a child is to be raised by a married mother and father,’” said the administration’s brief submitted to the court by Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli Jr.