How the Democrats JustifyTyranny

Image result for “Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive... those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”

People want to believe. They want to believe in the half truths that are told by people seeking to “help them”. History tells a different outcome: tyranny. Tyranny in recent history comes under the guise of Socialism/Communism. It is strange that people cannot see the repercussions of political ambition even as it is unfolding before their eyes in Venezuela.

So the question to be asked is one that will upset many. If people are too stupid to understand the consequences of ceding power to a smooth talking politician/revolutionary, should their voice count?

David DeGerolamo

      
Plugin by: PHP Freelancer
This entry was posted in Domestic Enemies, Editorial. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to How the Democrats JustifyTyranny

  1. Hans says:

    Regarding the consequences of collectivism, political ambition, and tyranny …

    If “we” must tolerate democracy, at least do so in a sane manner.

    Make the franchise available only to individuals who are living debt free ( assets -- liabilities > 0 ) on private land (with no subsidized housing) within the jurisdiction of their chosen legislative domain.

    All others may whine, snivel and pound sand … but shall not vote themselves ‘benefits’ from the pockets of the productive members of their community.

  2. a follower says:

    Should their voice count?
    How do you mean?

Comments are closed.