Rand Paul To CIA: “Can You Kill With Drones In The USA?”

Update 3/5/13: Eric Holder provides Sen. Paul with the answer.

This letter is a few days old, but is very important for every American to be aware of. Essentially, Rand Paul is threatening to filibuster Barack Obama’s nominee for the CIA, John Brennan, due to his refusal to answer a simple question:

Do you believe that the President has the power to authorize lethal force, such as a drone strike, against a U.S. citizen on U.S. soil, and without trial?

This should not be a complicated question to answer, yet it seems Obama, Brennan and pretty much every other little power consumed bureaucrat is incapable of doing so.  Below is Rand Paul’s letter reprinted in full (my [Michael Krieger of Liberty Blitzkrieg blog] emphasis added).

Dear Mr. Brennan,

In consideration of your nomination to be Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), I have repeatedly requested that you provide answers to several questions clarifying your role in the approval of lethal force against terrorism suspects, particularly those who are U.S. citizens. Your past actions in this regard, as well as your view of the limitations to which you are subject, are of critical importance in assessing your qualifications to lead the CIA. If it is not clear that you will honor the limits placed upon the Executive Branch by the Constitution, then the Senate should not confirm you to lead the CIA.

During your confirmation process in the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI), committee members have quite appropriately made requests similar to questions I raised in my previous letter to you-that you expound on your views on the limits of executive power in using lethal force against U.S. citizens, especially when operating on U.S. soil. In fact, the Chairman of the SSCI, Sen. Feinstein, specifically asked you in post-hearing questions for the record whether the Administration could carry out drone strikes inside the United States. In your response, you emphasized that the Administration “has not carried out” such strikes and “has no intention of doing so.” I do not find this response sufficient.

The question that I and many others have asked is not whether the Administration has or intends to carry out drone strikes inside the United States, but whether it believes it has the authority to do so. This is an important distinction that should not be ignored.

More…

      
Plugin by: PHP Freelancer
This entry was posted in Editorial and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Rand Paul To CIA: “Can You Kill With Drones In The USA?”

  1. A fine piece of “lawyering” by Brennan in his “no intention” response to Paul’s question. If a truthful answer to a question is incriminating then you answer a question that was not asked. Typical corrupt BS. What these people fail to learn from history is that once you start practicing lawlessness it is like a contagious disease which is hard to control and cannot be put back into the box until it runs its course.

  2. Pingback: Revealed: Holder Letter Leaves Open Possibility of Drone Strikes on U.S. Soil (Rand Paul) | AMERICAN BLOGGER: GUNNY.G ~ WEBLOG.EMAIL

Comments are closed.