Posted at TheBurningPlatform.com:
Opening Statement of the Petition
Starting from the 2nd paragraph, the petition reads [emphasis ours]:
“This case uncovers a serious national security breach that is unique and is of first impression, and due to the serious nature of this case it involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress, while deeming them unfit from ever holding office under Federal, State, County or local Governments found within the United States of America, and at the same time the trial court also has the authority, to be validated by this Court, to authorize the swearing in of the legal and rightful heirs for President and Vice President of the United States.
“In addition there are two doctrines that conflict with each other found in this case affecting every court in this country. These doctrines are known as the doctrine of equitable maxim and the doctrine of the object principle of justice. Equitable maxim created by this court, which the lower court used to dismiss this case, sets in direct violation of the object principle of justice also partially created by this Court and supported by other appeal courts and constitutional provisions.
“These conflicts call for the supervisory power of this Court to resolve these conflicts, which has not, but should be, settled by this Court without delay.”
The ensuing five (5) pages lists the names of the “Parties to the Proceedings,” all 388 of them in the U.S. Congress, the Senate, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and former Vice President Michael Pence.
…
Full Story at TheBurningPlatform.com
In response to all the overblown hype about this case which has flooded my inbox: I present Reality respecting the Supreme Court’s chance of accepting “cert” in a case: https://supremecourtpress.com/chance_of_success.html
Here is one other source for information on this case: You can learn more about this case @ https://7discoveries.com/
As I understand the case, it was brought on two grounds. This article from The Burning Platform only addressed one, namely the request for review based upon the inconsistencies in two legal theories. As mentioned, one theory was relied upon by the US District Court where the case was originated. So the requested review would be to determine if the District Court used a proper grounds to dismiss the case and that the claimed conflict in the two legal maxims/ways to rule, be eliminated by guidance from The Supremes.
The second grounds for appeal is procedural. After the District Court dismissed the case, the claimants (three Brunson brothers) filed an appeal with the US Eighth Circuit Court Of Appeals. Apparently, that court did nothing and just let the appeal sit in limbo. As I understand the facts, even the US Attorney did not file any response to the appeal and acted, like the Circuit Court of Appeals, as if the case did not exist.
So the second grounds of Brunsons’ claim is for The Supremes to issue a Writ of Mandamus. That is a an Order from a higher court to a lower court to “do your job” or comply with the law or established procedures. This is the most likely “win”” that the Brunsons will receive, as The Supremes castigate the Eighth Circuit for not processing the appeal as required.
The legal theory claimed to be effective in removing 388 Congressslimes and others, is at best a weak claim. To remove the Defendants from office they must be convicted of Treason. That requires criminal trials and convictions that survive any appeals. THERE HAVE BERN NO TRIALS FOR TREASON ! And there will be no trials !
Who could even realistically think the Dept of Just-us and F.B.Lie would lift a finger to even investigate the charges of Treason against any if the 388 Defendants ???
Without criminal conviction for Treason, there can be no removal from office. Brunsons cannot win. Nothing about the stolen elections will be changed by this case.
Yes, they may get their day in court for a hearing on the dismissal and they might even get a trial where they can put evidence into the record. They will achieve publicity and great expenses, but I suspect they knew that was likely when they filed their case.
Nothing will come of this. The Supreme Court is more interested in keeping the status quo nowadays.
Just watched a video by someone named Whitney Webb on the Jimmy Dore show. We’re screwed. She covered just some of the perverse goings on in DC and more. Jeffery Epstein was a very busy man. And he wasn’t the only one. Every intel agency in the world was working DC. Sodom and Gomorrah had nothing on DC. There is no fixing that place. It has to be leveled.
The rats are going to prosecute the pigs. No way. They enjoy eating what falls out of the pig’s plate. Nothing will happen. If you are waiting on the government to police itself, you have a long wait.
https://the-quash.captivate.fm/episode/a-scotus-case-floating-around-will-not-remove-385-congressmen