The calling card of a witch trial couldn’t be more blatant

What was a Witch hunt? Originally they were a communal defense of procreation. Once the Crown realized a majority of witches were big part of the economy, they took control by ‘allowing’ the Roman Catholic church to engage in Witch Trials. Witch Trials were put on by witches, for witches. Some Dudley do good protecting the women and children from ‘your’ advances, have him chased out of town by Witch Trial. Just go to the confessional, make your request, make the expected donation boom, Bob’s your uncle.

The above page is alleged to be a legal document. Here are two problems that stand out; there is no signature by a grand jury foreman, and legal documents are signed in BLACK ink. Ever close an estate using blue ink? ie Jack Smith uses a clown pen. The following page includes 5-7, to give the non-repeated allegations.

While the rest reads like a belligerent child’s Christmas wish list, written in detention hall, it give a great insight to their mindset, and who they truly represent. Notice everything turns around Friday Nov. 13th, 2020. <hyperlink read sixth paragraph. One accusation was that the electors were fraudulent because the legitimate electors were SUPPOSED to have gone through legal proceedings (ie assumed w/o validation). BAR members of the campaign used legal loopholes to put forth ‘fraudulent electors’ who went through the legal proceedings to become delegates. When Congress counted the electoral votes, there were more Delegates than legal electoral votes. Another tactic was to say popular vote, when the proper term should be vote count. This piece of smith would constantly phrase opinions as absolutes. The absurdity of this kid’s education level is mind boggling.

Page nine, item 13 is the first mention. On that day, two of his campaign attorneys conceded in court (really, what kind of court that of public opinion). Most accusations are based on him not taking advise from his subordinates. Next, page ten gives the full date, leaving no doubt that it’s a reference to the most sacred, Ides of March, day dedicated to the goddess of Pharmakia and Witchcraft (aka prostitution). Notice it’s under the title state of Arizona. On a side note, a female NYC human rights attorney followed a lead to an Arizona adoption agency, which was being protected by an assessor in Maricopa county (who had financial ties to the business). From AZ the trail lead to Yap, where the detective’s boyfriend gave a discreditable account of her death. (pre-corona) It’s been well known among the islanders that women could take an American ‘vacation’ to be part of a baby mill operation, coming home with big bucks.

IMO, page thirteen highlights their confederates within the campaign, the only time they’re mentioned is above the page number.

Now double, to get twenty-six, where we find the claim of data. Yet nothing in the claims throughout the entire document point to this information as valid. The sophistry is based on ELECTORS, which is obfuscation of DELEGATES. Jack goes on to say claim violations of the Election Certification Act of 1887. Humm, isn’t that the year the Statue of Liberty was erected in NY harbor (did you click on that hyperlink?). We really need to look into the ECA.

But wait, there’s more. A page has me wondering about Southern state Constitutions, as in Article one Section 3&5 of the NC Constitution having wording that would indicate a situation of subjugation. ^click that hyperlink^ ie as chattle of the US inc, they may have undisclosed control of our entire voting system. Delaware allows their corporations to have a level of secrecy only rivaled by Switzerland.

In conclusion, it’s a farce of epic proportions. Yet not completely useless, as it gives good insight to their insane train of thought. Please allow this to encourage you to dig deeper for yourself. It’s been more than one man can research with any competence.

Subscribe to NC Renegade Posts via Email