Mass Fatality Planning and Religious Considerations Act – GAME ON

Just in case there was any doubt of the purpose of the government’s purchase of over 1.6 billion hollow point rounds.

David DeGerolamo

More from Sovereign Man

H.R. 6566: To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency …

HR 6566 IH
112th CONGRESS

2nd Session
H. R. 6566

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to provide guidance and coordination for mass fatality planning, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
September 28, 2012Ms. RICHARDSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned


A BILL
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to provide guidance and coordination for mass fatality planning, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘Mass Fatality Planning and Religious Considerations Act’.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:

(1) Emergency preparedness often plans for how to prepare and provide for survivors of a natural disaster, act of terrorism, or other man-made disaster, but fails to plan for how to prepare for and respond to mass fatalities that result from such an incident.

(2) Funeral homes, cemeteries, and mortuaries could be overwhelmed should mass fatalities arise from a natural disaster, act of terrorism, or other man-made disaster.

(3) Different religions have different customs surrounding death; for example, the Jewish and Muslim religions call for burial of the deceased not later than 48 hours after death.

 

SEC. 3. PREPAREDNESS FOR MASS FATALITIES RESULTING FROM A NATURAL DISASTER, ACT OF TERRORISM, OR OTHER MAN-MADE DISASTER.

Section 504 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 314) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

‘(c) Preparedness for Mass Fatalities- In carrying out this section, the Administrator shall provide guidance to and coordinate with appropriate individuals, including representatives from different communities, private sector businesses, non-profit organizations, and religious organizations, to prepare for and respond to a natural disaster, act of terrorism, or other man-made disaster that results in mass fatalities.’.

      
Plugin by: PHP Freelancer
This entry was posted in Civil Unrest, Editorial and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Mass Fatality Planning and Religious Considerations Act – GAME ON

  1. Rocco says:

    Somehow I just don’t feel safer with all of this type of planning.

    To see another link with the full text go to http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c112:1:./temp/~c112R9tUXH::

  2. Hans says:

    Seems to be a ‘typo’ in the last sentence. My pre-cognitive BS filter read:

    “…or other government-made disaster that results in mass fatalities.”

  3. Roger says:

    I have to wonder IF other countries have anything like this on the books.

  4. rose says:

    whoa….nothing surprises me anymore….the more you dig…it never ends.

  5. Ricky Moore says:

    We’ve known that this was coming. And if you are a person that didnt, you either dont give a shit about your country, or your a F*cking braindead zombie.

    My suggestion: Join or start your own citizen militia now!

    http://www.mclennancountyminutemen.org

    http://www.wramsite.com

  6. LT says:

    We have, indeed, been warned. We have been without the legitimate rule of law for quite some time… and many people are *finally* waking up to that fact. As for those who are ‘stubbornly clinging’ to their hope and change, I can only give my personal interpretation, as flawed as that may be -- they are CHOOSING judgement instead of mercy, because they refuse to change their ways. We all have this choice, and yes, sometimes accepting mercy means accepting the stinging pain of our shame, the acknowlegement that we have done wrong and *need* that mercy, but it is still better than the alternative -- the judgement of an all-knowing God.

Leave a Reply