What Is the Definition of “Is” When It Comes to a Nuclear Iran?

See additional comments on Tea Party Nation

President Obama has stated that he will not tolerate a nuclear armed Iran:

As written earlier, Iran has tested nuclear warheads in North Korea. Now Japanese intelligence sources have confirmed this report as the United States is giving North Korea food for their starving masses (Madeleine Albright’s history lessons being repeated). The consequences of an inept president in our present economic and national security crises will be coming home to “roost” in the near future.

Mr. Obama is now backed into a corner: does he attack Iran in conjunction with Israel as he has stated publicly or does he wait for additional direction from Valerie Jarrett on how to redefine what he really meant? I understand that the people in America do not understand the nuances in play across the world at this point in time. I also understand that the military does understand what is at risk: our national sovereignty and security. Any soldier who has sworn to defend the US Constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic must now decide what this oath really means.

 David DeGerolamo

North Korea tested Iranian warhead or “dirty bomb” in 2010 for $55m 

German and Japanese intelligence sources Monday, March 5, confirmed – and qualified – to DEBKAfile reports in the German Der Spiegel and Welt am Sonntag that Western intelligence had known for 11 months that at least one of North Korea’s covert nuclear tests in 2010 was carried out on an Iranian radioactive bomb or nuclear warhead.
Those sources report five facts are known for sure:

1. North Korea carried out two covert underground nuclear explosions in mid-April and around May 11 of 2010 equivalent to 50- 200 tonnes of TNT.

2. Two highly lethal heavy hydrogen isotopes, deuterium and tritium,  typical of a nuclear fission explosion and producing long-term contamination of the atmosphere, were detected and analyzed by  Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBOTO) monitoring stations in South Korea, Japan and Russia.

3. The presence of tritium in one of the tests led several intelligence agencies watching North Korea’s nuclear program and its longstanding links with Iran and Syria to examine the possibility that Pyongyang had tested the internal mechanism of a nuclear warhead on Iran’s behalf.  This strongly indicated to German and Japanese intelligence that Iran had already developed the nuclear warhead’s outer shell and attained its weaponization.

4.  Another possibility examined was that North Korea had tested an Iranian “dirty bomb” – i.e. a conventionally detonated device containing nuclear substances. Tritium would boost its range, force and lethality.

This was one of the conclusions of atmospheric scientist Larsk-Erik De Geer of the Swedish Defense Research Agency in Stockholm, who spent a year studying the data collected by various CTBOTO stations tracking the North Korean explosions. On February 3, De Greer published some of his findings and conclusions in Nature Magazine. His paper will appear in the April/May issue of the Science and Global Security Journal.

5. The Japanese and German sources found confirmation of their suspicions that North Korea had abetted Iran’s nuclear aspirations in three events:

a)   Shortly after the April explosion, a large group of Iranian nuclear scientists and technicians arrived in Pyongyang. They apparently came to take part in setting up the second test in May.
b)  In late April, Tehran shipped to Pyongyang a large quantity of uranium enriched to 20+ percent – apparently for use in the May test.
c)  Straight after the May test, the Central Bank of Iran transferred $55 million to the account of the North Korean Atomic Energy Commission. The size of the sum suggests that it covered the fee to North Korea not just of one but the two tests – the first a pilot and the second, a full-stage test.

More…

      
Plugin by: PHP Freelancer
This entry was posted in Editorial and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.