Armed Checkpoints in Ohio

This entry was posted in Editorial. Bookmark the permalink.
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
General 'Buck' Turgidson
General 'Buck' Turgidson
3 hours ago

And please notice that the PO-PO is fully cooperating and acquiescing to these armed thugs--most likely on orders from higher ups in the city. What is needed here are a few experienced sharpshooters with heavy barreled precision rifles to remedy this situation. A few exploding heads would disperse these thugs instantly.

Randolph Scott
Randolph Scott
1 hour ago

finally, some 308 pills

Lee Vail AKA Kalev Efrayim
Lee Vail AKA Kalev Efrayim
1 hour ago
Reply to  Randolph Scott

.50 BMG is more effective at exploding heads.

GenEarly
GenEarly
39 minutes ago

Yep General , you just got out manuvered by the Ferals. Reacting as expected.
BTW, Cancelling open carry is in Our interest??? 2nd amendment doesn’t mention a racial component. Sheesh,

Green Hornet
Green Hornet
3 hours ago

Apparently there was a small rally of neo-national socialists down the street, unarmed.
This is how Grok responded to my query if it is legal for citizens to set up armed checkpoints in Ohio.
“No, it is not legal for citizens to establish armed checkpoints in Ohio. Here’s why based on the information available:

Constitutional Rights: The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. Setting up an armed checkpoint by civilians would likely violate this amendment, as it would involve stopping individuals without probable cause, which is a right reserved for law enforcement under specific legal guidelines.
State Law and Case Law:
Ohio follows the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Michigan v. Sitz (1990), which upheld the constitutionality of sobriety checkpoints conducted by law enforcement under stringent conditions. However, this ruling applies to law enforcement, not civilians.
The Ohio Revised Code and judicial interpretations emphasize that law enforcement must adhere to certain guidelines for sobriety checkpoints, like public notice, visible warnings, and a predetermined stopping pattern, none of which apply to or permit civilian actions.
Public Posts and Legal Opinions:
Posts on X (formerly Twitter) reflect a consensus among users that civilians setting up checkpoints, particularly armed ones, would be illegal. These opinions echo the understanding that such actions would infringe on civil rights, potentially leading to civil rights violation charges.
Legal advice from attorneys, as seen in various web articles, underscores that only law enforcement with proper authorization can conduct such stops, further highlighting the illegality of civilians doing the same.
Potential Legal Consequences:
Civilians attempting to establish armed checkpoints could face criminal charges for impersonating an officer, unlawful restraint, assault, or even kidnapping, depending on the specifics of their actions.
Ohio’s “castle doctrine” and laws related to self-defense in one’s home or vehicle do not extend to allowing civilians to stop and detain others on public roads or in public spaces.
Firearms Regulations: While Ohio has open carry and permitless carry laws for firearms, the use of these firearms in the context of creating a checkpoint would not be justified under the state’s gun laws, which do not give citizens the authority to perform law enforcement duties like setting up traffic or security checkpoints.

In summary, establishing armed checkpoints by citizens in Ohio is not only illegal but would likely lead to significant legal repercussions for those involved. Law enforcement is explicitly authorized to conduct such operations under very specific legal frameworks, which civilians do not share.”

Al Buckner
Al Buckner
3 hours ago

Let’s Don’t Jump To Conclusions, Just Maybe They Are Assisting To Tell Whites It’s Not Safe In Their Part Of The Hood. Showing some brotherly Love.
Like always, feeling strong in numbers and armed. They be brave….js (wonder how many of their weapons are legally to have we know they all have clean records, …..cough, cough

Bad_Brad
Bad_Brad
2 hours ago

The “Neo Nazis” arrived in a couple vans and were all dressed identical. Sound familiar?

Susan Harms
Susan Harms
2 hours ago

if the checkpoint was by police, why were the “Canadians” carrying long guns?

Andrew sarchus
Andrew sarchus
1 hour ago

Pay attention you will see this again. You may even be part of it. Imagine a group of people not from your neighborhood wanting to cause problems in your neighborhood. You and your neighbors will have to do something similar. Hopefully more organized and professional acting. You have read selco’s work?

phil1350
phil1350
53 minutes ago

the mentally unbalanced Rino governor should have called out the national guard by now to disburse the low I.Q. bell curve democratic jackasses, these are black racist Marxist communist thugs tied in with their black Marxist leaders in that crap hole of a city.

173dVietVet
173dVietVet
50 minutes ago

Read this article which puts more facts onto the report: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/armed-neo-nazis-get-police-protection-black-residents-ohio-express-dis-rcna191794
The short video does not indicate that a Neo-Nazi group with flags chose a spot next to the historic all-black township for a demonstration.
Why now ? And Why there ? Could it be F.B.Lie is up to its old tricks trying to start trouble so they can make easy arrests from the inside for fleeting glory (until the cases fall apart in court…….) ??
Or could Woeamaz controller, George Soros, be fomenting provocations so Trump can be blamed by our bought and paid for lying media ??
Hmmmm….. ??

GenEarly
GenEarly
44 minutes ago

Probably FIB acting as Nazis to rile up the community. No laws were broken in the “protest”, but now Blacks will Say Whites cannot open carry while Armed Black Militia (not harrassed by FIB/ATF) get to protest.
Seems fair, and Effective. Just the FIB inciting violence as usual.

Mike harris
Mike harris
42 minutes ago

I used to live in an adjoining city to Lincoln Heights. There are very few places in greater cincy that are bigger shitholes. The question that I have for people is this… The people with the swastika flags were set up on a bridge that leads to a federal defense contractor. GE aircraft engines. Why would that be allowed? What is the chances that the people were the same glowies as patriot front?
I can’t see them allowing masked, armed men to set up at the location. It’s all to get people to do crazy stuff like this. Simple