July 2, 2009
The following report from Debka will change the dynamics in the Middle East. The willingness of the West to compromise (appease) Iran through negotiations has now shown how Iran deftly played Obama and Hillary Clinton’s State Department as well as North Korea. So where does this leave us? In a worst case scenario of a EMP attack. Fear mongering or reality?
Connecting the dots:
- Iran has successfully tested missile launches from ships capable of detonating a nuclear warhead to generate an EMP.
- Iran has openly declared that the United States is the Great Satan and must be destroyed.
- Obama has publicly stated above that Iran will not be allowed to have nuclear weapons.
- If Iran knows that an attack is imminent, their option would be to launch a preemptive nuclear strike.
- With the release of the Iranian nuclear experts’ names and the second round of talks in Iraq scheduled on May 23rd, time is running out for Iran.
So you are left with two tasks:
- Analyze the above logic and ask yourself what you would do if you were making the decisions in Iran?
- Do you trust your future to the decisions being made in Washington, DC?
David DeGerolamo
See additional comments on Tea Party Nation.
More than 60 nuclear experts at work building Iranian nuclear bomb
The names and addresses of 60 Iranian experts employed by 11 different Iranian agencies under the control of the Iranian Defense Ministry were revealed Saturday, May 12, by the main Iranian opposition Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK/PMOI). This is the first time an extensive, highly secret, central organizational structure dedicated to building a nuclear weapon has been revealed in detail – specifically the Ministry of Defense under the command of the Revolutionary Guard Corps, which also runs the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant.
The information updated to April 2012 was provided by “sources within the Iranian regime’s agencies, including military institutions.”
It contradicts the fundamental conclusion reached by the US and five world powers and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) – that Iran’s nuclear program is not run by a single organization – on the basis of which they entered into negotiation with Tehran. Most of all, it refutes another key argument heard in the West that Iran has not yet decided to actually build a weapon because Iran’s supreme leader Ali Khamenei’s said it would be a “sin.”
The Mujahedin-e Khalq, which Tehran accuses of collaborating with US and Israeli intelligence to assassinate its nuclear scientists, clearly timed the publication of its findings for 11 days before the Six Powers were due to hold a second round of nuclear talks with Iran in Baghdad on May 23, DEBKAfile’s intelligence and Iranian sources report.
Ahead of the meeting, US administration sources put about word that a compromise deal developed in the direct backdoor channel between Washington and Tehran had a good chance of coming before the meeting. It was said to consist of three points of accord: Allowing uranium enrichment up to 5 percent purity to continue; barring enrichment up to 20 percent (effectively discontinuing work at Fordow); and exporting Iran’s entire 20 percent in stock to prevent its use for bomb production.
According to DEBKAfile’s Iranian intelligence sources, there is no such deal: Tehran is not willing either to stop 20 percent uranium enrichment or shut down the Fordow plant. Just the opposite: DEBKA-Net-Weekly, the only Western publication following the secret US-Iranian negotiations, last week quoted a message from Khamenei to President Barack Obama flatly refusing to close Fordow, whose sole purpose is the production of 20 percent grade uranium which brings the fuel a short step before weapons grade.
