AG Lynch: ‘We Have Concerns’ About People ‘Who Have Large Stockpiles of Weapons’

“Dealing with guns is one way to handle the violent crime issues that we have in this country,” Attorney General Loretta Lynch told NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday.

She also said “people come on the FBI’s radar screen for a variety of reasons,” and the accumulation of guns and bullets may be one of those reasons:

“You know, obviously we have concerns whenever we see people who have large stockpiles of weapons or appear to be in the process of accumulating weapons and ammunition. At this point, we do not have any evidence that they (Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik) were part of either a larger group or cell or that they were planning anything else. That’s at this time.

“What I will say is, again, we are continuing to run everything to ground we can about these two individuals.”

More…

      
Plugin by: PHP Freelancer
This entry was posted in 2nd Amendment, Domestic Enemies, Editorial. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to AG Lynch: ‘We Have Concerns’ About People ‘Who Have Large Stockpiles of Weapons’

  1. Tom Angle says:

    The government has a large stockpile of arms and ammunition.

  2. Hillbilly says:

    Since when is two riffles and two pistols a large stock pile of weapons?
    A special investigation into the financing of the terrorist couple.
    2 AR’s @1k ea.
    2 Hand guns @$500.00 ea.
    2 cans of gun powder @ $25.00 ea.
    Some threaded pipe and caps from Home depot. estimated cost = $ 100.00
    2000 rounds of 5.56 = $650.00
    200 rounds 9mm = $80.00
    $3880.00. About a months wages for a county health inspector.
    We as tax payers will end up paying a team of special investigators from at least 3 federal law enforcement agencies for what amounts to the same information.
    Of Corse they will factor in phones ,lap-tops and their rent and the value of their car and come up with the conclusion that this was a highly sophisticated terror cell with unlimited resources.
    Thus we must add around $400 billion to the D.H.S. budget to fight the terrorists.

    • Phil says:

      those two hand guns were police issue , and no one in the media is talking about it, even that jerk from California Fiorina brought it up on a CNN news encounter and they fastly cut it out. so there is a major complicity here by someone in a federal law enforcement agency who had part in issuing the handguns to them , knowingly or unknowingly, you decide.

  3. Average Joe says:

    Yes, Loretta we all remember what you did in Waco to those women and children.

    From the ‘never let a crisis go to waste’ crowd we need to always remember it is the government who created this situation. The government has allowed, especially since 1965, millions and millions of third world immigrants who do not share our history, beliefs, and culture to flood our country. When they abuse our liberties, rather than stopping the flood and returning to pre-1965 immigration policies, suggest those same liberties are the problem. Anyone else see a pattern here?

    As stated liberty IS our security and ideas or suggestions to the contrary should be viewed as what they are, ranting of a tyrant attempting to forge chains upon us and our posterity.

  4. “We the People” have concerns about AG Lynch!

    It is a moral outrage and a national disgrace that US citizens would ever have less weapons and ammunition designed specifically to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency then Our own government.

    This must include “weapons of war” with No permits.
    “…shall not be infringed.”

    If you’re a terrorist, a tyrant or a carjacker, you want unarmed citizens.

    We must Always Outgun Our government!

    We have been warned:

    “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.” – Patrick Henry

    “The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States.” – Noah Webster, “An Examination into the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution (1787) in Pamplets on the Constitution of the United States (P.Ford, 1888)

    “But now, he who has a money bag, let him take it, and likewise a knapsack; and he who has no sword, let him sell his garment and buy one.” — Jesus, speaking to His disciples in Luke 22:36 (NKJV)

    “[T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or the state governments, but where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the People.” – Tench Coxe, Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788.

    The 1st Law of Nature is the Duty of Self-Preservation!
    Constitutional Carry Anywhere!

    Our 2nd Amendment is Not about government controlling US, it’s about US controlling Our government!

Comments are closed.