In Search of a More Precise Vocabulary

I often struggle to find words and phrases which convey exactly what I mean.

This article replaces two common phrases with much more precise alternatives:

People constantly use these terms . . .

  • The Public Sector
  • The Private Sector

I want to argue that these terms are deceptive, and cause mischief in the mind.

I think we should stop using them entirely, and instead depict the distinction in the following way:

“The Voluntary Sector vs. The Coercive State.”

Here’s why . . .

  • The word “public” is mostly used when referring to anything involving The State.
  • The word “private” is always used in reference to the rest of society.

But does this really make sense?

Private has a connotation of “walled off” and “exclusive,” but in fact nearly all private businesses are open to the public, and access to so-called public institutions is often more restrictive than it is for so-called private property.

In addition, many businesses are described as being publicly owned, because they belong to large numbers of shareholders, but this use of the word “public” doesn’t mean that these companies are owned by The State. You see, the way we use these words is inconsistent, and often contradictory.

Most importantly, using the word “public” as another name for The State deceives people into thinking they have more control over The State than they actually do.

It seems to me that the true distinction we ought to make is as follows . . .

  • The so-called private sector is based on peaceful, voluntary transactions and relationships. Therefore, we should call it The Voluntary Sector.
  • The so-called public sector — The State — is based on violence and threats thereof. Do what we say or else we will hurt you. Everything done by the politicians and bureaucrats who run The State is based on coercion. Therefore, the term we use for this sector should reflect this coercive reality.

Now we could use the term The Coercive Sector in order to create an exact parallel to The Voluntary Sector, and this term should be a part of our lexicon, but I think this would actually be an imprecise way to speak. The two terms we use most often should not be precisely parallel because the reality of what is being described is not exactly parallel. It isn’t only that one side is voluntary, and the other side coercive, it’s also true that . . .

  • One side, The Voluntary Sector, really is a sector, because it’s made up of millions of institutions that provide us with a boundless array of benefits and choices, while . . .
  • The other side is not a sector, it’s a monopoly, because it doesn’t present us with a host of choices, but instead gives us only one choice, the Statist choice dictated to us by politicians and bureaucrats.

For this reason I think we should use terms that are not exactly parallel. We should talk about The Voluntary Sector and The Coercive State.

Read more and find other Lexicon entries at Downsize DC

Plugin by: PHP Freelancer
This entry was posted in Editorial. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to In Search of a More Precise Vocabulary

  1. admin says:

    So why do people allow themselves to be voluntarily coerced by the “State”?

    “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”

    Ben Franklin

    I wonder what Ben would say about our public vs. private sectors today.

    • Hans says:

      “… voluntarily coerced …”

      An oxymoron, or the act of a moron ? Both ?

      BTW, Ben would say “WTF?” (!)

      • admin says:

        Don’t you feel voluntarily coerced to pay sales tax, gas tax, payroll tax, property tax, social security, medicare and unearned income taxes? What should we call the death tax?

        • Hans says:

          No … just coerced.

          If I had an option, other than the barrel of a gun and jail, I wouldn’t pay. That’s the definition of coercion:

          In law, coercion is codified as the duress crime. Such actions are used as leverage, to force the victim to act in the desired way. Coercion may involve the actual infliction of physical pain/injury or psychological harm in order to enhance the credibility of a threat.

          • admin says:

            NCAR citizenship?

          • Hans says:

            I am studying benfits of NCAR citizenship.

            However … I am not yet convinced the ‘de jure’ State has the will and means (sovereignty) to protect its citizens from use of force by the ‘de facto’ State.

            And … I / we would still exposed to coercion by the ‘general government’ which has the power to reach inside States and act on State citizens.

            (a defect in the ‘More Perfect Union’, introduced by the Constitution, that was not present under the Articles of Confederation.)

Comments are closed.