Fool, Domestic Enemy or Both

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7k9x7XlTGTk

Your pResident stated:

 “No religion is responsible for terrorism. People are responsible for violence and terrorism.”

Let’s use the same logic with one change:

 “No firearm is responsible for terrorism. People are responsible for violence and terrorism.”

And yet, Obama would destroy the 2nd Amendment and our right to bear arms. He would leave our borders not only open, but encourages illegal aliens to enter freely.

I am not diverging from the point the Obama first made. We have to ask why he is purposefully trying to mislead us? Why are our borders open? Why is he limiting ammunition and the 2nd amendment. Why is your pResident openly supporting Islam?

David DeGerolamo

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Obama: ISIS ‘aren’t religious leaders, they’re terrorists’

President Obama on Wednesday said he doesn’t describe the United States as being at war with radical Islam because he doesn’t want to give undue credit to the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

They’re not religious leaders, they’re terrorists,” Obama said of ISIS in remarks at the White House’s summit on countering violent extremism.

Obama argued that ISIS wants to present itself as representing a religion, which is why they refer to themselves as the Islamic State.

“We are not at war with Islam. We are at war with people who have perverted Islam,” he said.  “No religion is responsible for terrorism. People are responsible for violence and terrorism.”

More…

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

For a reality check:

The Quran:

Quran (2:191-193)“And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing…

but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful.   And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone.  But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)”  (Translation is from the Noble Quran)  The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries.  In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did).  The use of the word “persecution” by some Muslim translators is thus disingenuous (the actual Muslim words for persecution – “idtihad” – and oppression – a variation of “z-l-m” – do not appear in the verse).  The actual Arabic comes from “fitna” which can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation.  Taken as a whole, the context makes clear that violence is being authorized until “religion is for Allah” – ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.

Quran (2:244)“Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things.”

Quran (2:216)Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.”  Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time.  From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot. 

Quran (3:56)“As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help.”

Quran (3:151)“Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority”.  This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be ‘joining companions to Allah’).

Quran (4:74)“Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward.”  The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, who were led meekly to the slaughter.  These Muslims are killed in battle as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah.  This is the theological basis for today’s suicide bombers.

Quran (4:76)“Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…”

Quran (4:89)“They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks.”

More…

This entry was posted in Domestic Enemies, Editorial, Radical Islam. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
J Marshalek
J Marshalek
10 years ago

He is anti-Christ. But one must remember that he is just the communicator for those behind the veil.

Hillbilly
Hillbilly
10 years ago

IsIs is following the Quran to the letter, they are as islamic as it gets, it’s all the other sectors of islam who are NOT following the Quran. What the pResident profess’s is back asswards….

Stephen Hahn
10 years ago

I do not think that obama is a fool. So, what does that make him? He is doing too much damage for it be an accident.