Gold Price

Question for Grok:

If all of the paper gold contracts are called in, what will be the price of gold?

Grok’s answer:

Predicting the exact price of gold if all paper gold contracts were called in is inherently speculative, as it depends on numerous variables, including the total volume of paper contracts, the amount of physical gold available, market reactions, and systemic responses from financial institutions and regulators. However, we can explore the dynamics and potential outcomes based on available data and economic principles.

“Paper gold” refers to financial instruments like futures, options, ETFs, and unallocated gold accounts that represent claims on gold without necessarily being backed by physical metal. These contracts vastly outnumber the physical gold available for delivery. For instance, the ratio of paper gold to physical gold has been estimated to range from 100:1 to over 200:1 in various markets, such as the COMEX, depending on open interest and registered physical inventories. As of recent data, COMEX gold futures open interest often represents tens of millions of ounces, while registered physical gold available for delivery is typically under 1 million ounces—sometimes as low as 870,000 ounces, as noted in historical analyses from 2014.

If all paper gold contracts were simultaneously “called in”—meaning holders demanded physical delivery—the immediate issue would be a massive supply-demand mismatch. Annual global gold mine production is approximately 3,000 metric tons (about 96.5 million ounces), while estimates of total above-ground physical gold range around 200,000 metric tons (6.4 billion ounces), much of which is held in jewelry, central bank reserves, or private holdings, not readily available for delivery. In contrast, the notional value of paper gold traded monthly on exchanges like COMEX and the London OTC market can equate to hundreds of billions of dollars—far exceeding physical supply.

In such a scenario, the market would likely face a “short squeeze” or delivery failure. Exchanges like COMEX typically see less than 3% of contracts result in physical delivery, with most settled in cash or rolled over. If all contract holders demanded delivery, the physical gold simply wouldn’t exist to fulfill those claims. Historical anecdotes, like Kyle Bass’s 2011 conversation with a COMEX official, suggest that even a 4% delivery demand could strain the system, with the official noting that “price will solve everything”—implying a sharp price spike to ration the limited supply.

The price impact would depend on how the market and institutions respond:

1. Extreme Price Surge: If physical delivery were enforced, the price of gold could skyrocket as buyers compete for the scarce metal. Some speculative estimates, like those derived from dividing quarterly paper gold demand (e.g., $337 billion in Q1 2011) by quarterly mine supply (625 tons), suggest theoretical prices as high as $16,920 per ounce in a purely physical market. Adjusted for today’s gold price (around $2,500 per ounce in February 2025) and higher notional volumes, figures could climb into the tens or hundreds of thousands per ounce. Posts on X have even suggested $580,000 per ounce based on a 200:1 ratio, though this assumes no market intervention and a complete collapse of paper claims.
2. Market Collapse and Cash Settlement: More realistically, exchanges and bullion banks would likely halt trading, force cash settlements, or declare a “force majeure.” This would render most paper contracts worthless or settled at a pre-crisis price, decoupling the paper market from physical gold. Physical gold prices could still rise dramatically due to loss of confidence in paper instruments, potentially reaching $5,000–$10,000 per ounce or higher, as seen in past crises (e.g., adjusted for inflation from 1980’s $850 peak to today’s $3,000+ equivalent), driven by panic buying and safe-haven demand.
3. Systemic Factors: Central banks, holding about 35,000 tons (1.1 billion ounces) of gold, might intervene to stabilize markets, either by leasing gold or refusing to honor excessive claims. Regulatory bodies like the CFTC could impose limits, while major players (e.g., bullion banks) might induce supply to mitigate a squeeze, as suggested in past analyses. However, if trust in the system erodes—say, due to a geopolitical or economic trigger like a contested election or currency crisis—physical gold prices could decouple entirely from paper prices, soaring as a tangible asset.

Given these dynamics, a plausible range for physical gold prices in a full call-in scenario might be $10,000 to $50,000 per ounce in the short term, reflecting extreme scarcity and panic, though this assumes no systemic caps or failures. Over time, prices could stabilize lower (e.g., $5,000–$15,000) as markets adjust, new supply is mined, or alternatives (e.g., silver) absorb demand. However, without precise, real-time data on all outstanding contracts and available gold as of February 18, 2025, these figures remain educated guesses.

The true outcome hinges on human behavior, institutional resilience, and whether the paper gold system’s leverage—often likened to fractional reserve banking—finally unravels under pressure. History suggests markets adapt, but a total call-in would test that adaptability like never before.