https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52YmVNeibOw
The 2nd amendment’s main purpose is to protect the people from a tyrannical government. When a government becomes tyrannical, they will protect their interests by disarming the people. History shows this is the first step that leads to genocide. Veterans have been labelled as a domestic terrorist threat by DHS. Our leaders want these “terrorists” disarmed in order to secure their tyranny. So the question becomes simple: why does the military leadership put our soldiers in harm’s way? The answer is also simple: any military leader who supported the Constitution instead of the “cOmmander in chief” has been replaced.
So much for domestic tranquility.
David DeGerolamo
I love that woman! She said what I couldn’t possible have written; not without throwing in a few unacceptable adjectives or nouns.
Thank you, George H.W. Bush!
Yes, it former President Bush whom we must thank for this, for it was he who put into place a regulation stating that American soldiers off the frontlines, for the most part, must be unarmed. (Clinton perpetuated it, but Bush started it.) That makes them sitting ducks for a single radical Muslim with a gun, who can casually go and shoot one soldier at a time, knowing they can’t fire back.
But what is not widely known are the reasons why Bush signed this order. A Pentagon spokesman stated that the Pentagon is against U.S. troops being armed on base:
… the Pentagon opposed the move for various reasons. “The first of which is safety,”
This is so upside-down. The soldiers are safer if they are carrying guns. They are less safe if they are all disarmed, because they can be massacred by a radical Muslim.
“The final one is local requirements and other policy requirements, for example the Lautenberg requirement,” he said, referring to a 1996 amendment by the late Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) that prohibits those convicted of misdemeanor crimes from carrying a weapon.
This is ignorance of the worst kind. Federal bases and federal employees are not subject to “local requirements.” It’s called federalism. Look it up!
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/07/the_unbelievable_reasons_why_the_pentagon_wants_soldiers_disarmed_on_bases.html