The Catholic Church Wants to Continue Child Trafficking?

Posted in Editorial | 7 Comments

Delta Unmanned

Posted in Editorial | 5 Comments

Senators in Violation of the Logan Act

The consequences are clear. If the law is not upheld, we will never restore the Republic.

Posted in Editorial | 6 Comments

Trump and Musk

I watched the interview. I did learn a few things but nothing important. I cannot help but wonder what we would have learned if Tucker had conducted this interview.

Posted in Editorial | 7 Comments

The Oracle of Omaha just dumped Berkshire’s stake in two historically surefire investments

Warren Buffett and his top advisors, Ted Weschler and Todd Combs, were busy bees during the December-ended quarter. Five existing positions were added to, one new purchase was made, nine existing positions were reduced, and three holdings were given the heave-ho.

While some investors are likely to focus on the biggest-dollar moves made in the fourth quarter, such as the continued aggressive selling of No. 3 holdingBank of America, the more telling action might be Berkshire’s complete exit from the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: VOO) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (NYSEMKT: SPY).

More…

h/t Michael

Posted in Editorial | 3 Comments

Prescription Costs

Posted in Editorial | 7 Comments

Wake County School Board

Posted in Editorial | 14 Comments

From Matt Bracken on X

Posted in Editorial | 4 Comments

Senior Department of Justice Prosecutor Denise Cheung Has Resigned

Posted in Editorial | 8 Comments

Head of US Postal Service Is Stepping Down

Posted in Editorial | 4 Comments

Head of FDA’s Food Division Resigns

Posted in Editorial | 7 Comments

Why Did Democrats Destroy the Country with Cloward-Piven?

Posted in Editorial | 9 Comments

Silver Price

From Grok:

If all paper gold contracts were called in, silver prices would likely experience significant upward pressure as well, though the dynamics differ due to silver’s unique market characteristics, including its higher industrial use, greater above-ground supply, and historically higher paper-to-physical ratios. Let’s break down the potential impact on silver prices in such a scenario.

Key Factors Influencing Silver

  1. Paper-to-Physical Ratio: Like gold, silver has a massive overhang of paper contracts—futures, options, and ETFs—relative to physical supply. On the COMEX, the ratio of open interest to registered silver available for delivery often exceeds 100:1 and can spike to 500:1 or more during periods of stress. For example, as of recent years, open interest in COMEX silver futures has hovered around 700–800 million ounces, while registered silver inventories have occasionally dipped below 30 million ounces. A full call-in of paper contracts would expose this mismatch even more dramatically than in gold, given silver’s larger trading volume relative to physical stockpiles.
  2. Physical Supply and Demand: Annual silver mine production is about 26,000 metric tons (around 836 million ounces), with total above-ground stocks estimated at 1.5–2 billion ounces, much of it tied up in industrial products, jewelry, or investor holdings. Unlike gold, roughly 50–60% of silver demand comes from industrial applications (e.g., solar panels, electronics), leaving less available for investment or delivery against contracts. A gold squeeze could push investors toward silver as a substitute safe-haven asset, amplifying demand on an already tight physical market.
  3. Gold-Silver Ratio: Historically, the gold-silver price ratio has averaged around 60:1 in modern markets, though it’s been as low as 15:1 (e.g., 1980 peak) and as high as 100:1 during oversupply periods. As of February 18, 2025, with gold at approximately $2,500 per ounce, silver trades around $30–$35 per ounce, yielding a ratio of 70–80:1. A sharp rise in gold prices due to a paper contract collapse could drag silver prices higher, either maintaining or compressing this ratio depending on relative scarcity and investor behavior.
  4. Market Contagion: A breakdown in the gold paper market would likely erode trust in all precious metals derivatives, including silver. If gold prices soared to, say, $10,000–$50,000 per ounce (as speculated in the prior response), silver could follow suit as investors and speculators flee paper instruments for physical metal. X posts and analyst commentary have long warned of a “silver squeeze” potential, with figures like $1,000 per ounce floated in extreme scenarios, echoing the Hunt brothers’ 1980 spike when silver hit $50 (about $180 today, inflation-adjusted).

Price Scenarios

  • Moderate Impact: If gold rises to $10,000 per ounce and the gold-silver ratio holds near 70:1, silver could climb to $140–$150 per ounce. This assumes silver tracks gold’s safe-haven appeal but remains constrained by industrial supply chains and less panic-driven demand.
  • Significant Squeeze: If the ratio compresses to a historical norm like 40:1 or lower (e.g., 15:1 during crises), reflecting silver’s own supply crunch, prices could leap higher. At $10,000 gold and a 40:1 ratio, silver hits $250 per ounce; at $50,000 gold and a 15:1 ratio, it could reach $3,333 per ounce. The latter aligns with speculative claims on X and elsewhere that silver could “10x or 100x” in a systemic failure.
  • Extreme Outcome: Silver’s paper market is even more leveraged than gold’s, and its physical availability is arguably tighter for investment purposes due to industrial lockup. If a gold crisis triggers a parallel silver delivery demand—say, 800 million ounces of paper claims against 30 million ounces of COMEX-registered silver—the price could detach from fundamentals entirely. Estimates like $500–$1,000 per ounce become plausible in a short-term frenzy, though sustaining such levels would depend on inflows of recycled silver or mining ramps (which take years).

Additional Dynamics

  • Industrial Disruption: A silver price surge would hammer industries reliant on it, like solar and electronics, potentially freeing up supply as manufacturers balk at costs. However, this feedback loop might lag, exacerbating the initial spike.
  • Silver-Specific Squeeze: Unlike gold, silver has seen retail-driven squeeze attempts (e.g., 2021’s #SilverSqueeze), suggesting a cultural readiness to exploit paper market vulnerabilities. A gold crisis could ignite a parallel silver rush, especially if bullion banks or exchanges fail to deliver.
  • Systemic Response: As with gold, exchanges might force cash settlements or halt trading, capping silver’s rise. However, if physical demand persists—bolstered by gold’s precedent—silver could still decouple, hitting $100–$300 per ounce as a baseline in a distrustful market.

Plausible Range

Assuming a gold price jump to $10,000–$50,000 per ounce, silver might realistically land between $150 and $1,000 per ounce in the chaos of a paper gold collapse. A middle-ground estimate of $300–$500 per ounce balances historical ratios (e.g., 20–30:1), supply constraints, and panic buying, though short-term spikes could overshoot this. The ceiling depends on how much silver escapes industrial use and whether investors treat it as “poor man’s gold” in a crisis.

In short, silver would likely ride gold’s coattails upward, magnified by its own overstretched paper market and tighter physical float. The exact price hinges on the gold outcome, investor psychology, and whether the system buckles or bends under the strain.

Posted in Editorial | 3 Comments

Gold Price

Question for Grok:

If all of the paper gold contracts are called in, what will be the price of gold?

Grok’s answer:

Predicting the exact price of gold if all paper gold contracts were called in is inherently speculative, as it depends on numerous variables, including the total volume of paper contracts, the amount of physical gold available, market reactions, and systemic responses from financial institutions and regulators. However, we can explore the dynamics and potential outcomes based on available data and economic principles.

“Paper gold” refers to financial instruments like futures, options, ETFs, and unallocated gold accounts that represent claims on gold without necessarily being backed by physical metal. These contracts vastly outnumber the physical gold available for delivery. For instance, the ratio of paper gold to physical gold has been estimated to range from 100:1 to over 200:1 in various markets, such as the COMEX, depending on open interest and registered physical inventories. As of recent data, COMEX gold futures open interest often represents tens of millions of ounces, while registered physical gold available for delivery is typically under 1 million ounces—sometimes as low as 870,000 ounces, as noted in historical analyses from 2014.

If all paper gold contracts were simultaneously “called in”—meaning holders demanded physical delivery—the immediate issue would be a massive supply-demand mismatch. Annual global gold mine production is approximately 3,000 metric tons (about 96.5 million ounces), while estimates of total above-ground physical gold range around 200,000 metric tons (6.4 billion ounces), much of which is held in jewelry, central bank reserves, or private holdings, not readily available for delivery. In contrast, the notional value of paper gold traded monthly on exchanges like COMEX and the London OTC market can equate to hundreds of billions of dollars—far exceeding physical supply.

In such a scenario, the market would likely face a “short squeeze” or delivery failure. Exchanges like COMEX typically see less than 3% of contracts result in physical delivery, with most settled in cash or rolled over. If all contract holders demanded delivery, the physical gold simply wouldn’t exist to fulfill those claims. Historical anecdotes, like Kyle Bass’s 2011 conversation with a COMEX official, suggest that even a 4% delivery demand could strain the system, with the official noting that “price will solve everything”—implying a sharp price spike to ration the limited supply.

The price impact would depend on how the market and institutions respond:

  1. Extreme Price Surge: If physical delivery were enforced, the price of gold could skyrocket as buyers compete for the scarce metal. Some speculative estimates, like those derived from dividing quarterly paper gold demand (e.g., $337 billion in Q1 2011) by quarterly mine supply (625 tons), suggest theoretical prices as high as $16,920 per ounce in a purely physical market. Adjusted for today’s gold price (around $2,500 per ounce in February 2025) and higher notional volumes, figures could climb into the tens or hundreds of thousands per ounce. Posts on X have even suggested $580,000 per ounce based on a 200:1 ratio, though this assumes no market intervention and a complete collapse of paper claims.
  2. Market Collapse and Cash Settlement: More realistically, exchanges and bullion banks would likely halt trading, force cash settlements, or declare a “force majeure.” This would render most paper contracts worthless or settled at a pre-crisis price, decoupling the paper market from physical gold. Physical gold prices could still rise dramatically due to loss of confidence in paper instruments, potentially reaching $5,000–$10,000 per ounce or higher, as seen in past crises (e.g., adjusted for inflation from 1980’s $850 peak to today’s $3,000+ equivalent), driven by panic buying and safe-haven demand.
  3. Systemic Factors: Central banks, holding about 35,000 tons (1.1 billion ounces) of gold, might intervene to stabilize markets, either by leasing gold or refusing to honor excessive claims. Regulatory bodies like the CFTC could impose limits, while major players (e.g., bullion banks) might induce supply to mitigate a squeeze, as suggested in past analyses. However, if trust in the system erodes—say, due to a geopolitical or economic trigger like a contested election or currency crisis—physical gold prices could decouple entirely from paper prices, soaring as a tangible asset.

Given these dynamics, a plausible range for physical gold prices in a full call-in scenario might be $10,000 to $50,000 per ounce in the short term, reflecting extreme scarcity and panic, though this assumes no systemic caps or failures. Over time, prices could stabilize lower (e.g., $5,000–$15,000) as markets adjust, new supply is mined, or alternatives (e.g., silver) absorb demand. However, without precise, real-time data on all outstanding contracts and available gold as of February 18, 2025, these figures remain educated guesses.

The true outcome hinges on human behavior, institutional resilience, and whether the paper gold system’s leverage—often likened to fractional reserve banking—finally unravels under pressure. History suggests markets adapt, but a total call-in would test that adaptability like never before.

Posted in Editorial | 4 Comments

Tucker Carlson – Jeffrey Sachs

Posted in Editorial | Comments Off on Tucker Carlson – Jeffrey Sachs