From 2014. I often wonder how we made it this far.
David DeGerolamo
h/t Joe Berlyak
From 2014. I often wonder how we made it this far.
David DeGerolamo
h/t Joe Berlyak
https://twitter.com/profitoffacts/status/938278357464158208
https://twitter.com/JaydaBF/status/938380344897822720

The FBI is coming unglued and the only thing holding it together are the agents themselves, continuing to mask over the obvious and complete corruption within their ranks. Let me ask the average FBI agent this question: If I were in full knowledge of criminal activity at my workplace and did nothing, would I not be somewhat culpable in the crimes committed there? What if I knew that my boss was falsifying bank records to avoid paying federal and state income taxes? Should I just turn a blind eye, or contact either the FBI or the IRS? Just curious, because it doesn’t seem like there is any intention of the agents themselves, trained law enforcement personnel, to discover and expose or even take into custody any of the outright criminals within their ranks.
It is a well known axiom that there are always a few rotten apples that should not be allowed to spoil the whole bunch, but that is exactly what is taking place within federal law enforcement. The problem is, if there are only a few rotten apples, why haven’t the good apples exposed and deposed them? And, if they do not, does that not mean that there are no “good” apples in the bunch at all, but rather a bunch of bad apples covering for and refusing to confront the bad apples? I have always been suspicious of the idea that there are only a few bad apples. I think that is some sort of justification for doing nothing, but by doing nothing, the good apples are doing something. They are turning their backs on illegal activity for the sake of what? Their good name? Sorry, that is blown.
Philadelphia Democrats push to ban bulletproof Plexiglass that protects store employees in Liquor Stores because it represents an “Indignity”.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You can easily make a case that this is racism in Philadelphia. At the very least, it is stupidity. However, it is clear that their “leaders” are only representing race instead of constituents.
David DeGerolamo
A hard economic crash is unavoidable. Even if you don’t want to understand.

This article will not go viral.
Professor Charles W. Kingsfield Jr. announces his mission statement to his first-year contracts class at Harvard Law School.
You teach yourselves the law, but I train your mind. You come in here with a skull full of mush; you leave thinking like a lawyer.
Kingsfield is a fictional character, from the novel, 1973 movie, and television series The Paper Chase. John Houseman, as Kingsfield, had as memorable a voice and almost as fearsome a demeanor as Darth Vader, who would appear four years after The Paper Chase movie. Houseman won an Academy Award and became the spokesman for Smith Barney, stating its tag line with aristocratic frost: “They make money the old fashioned way…they earn it.”
Teaching his charges to think like lawyers meant developing and honing their ability to think logically, to analyze, and to present arguments and conclusions with precision and clarity. More’s the pity Kingsfield was fictional; most people would benefit from such instruction. Harvard’s fictional One L’s were a bright lot. If their skulls were full of mush, then skulls today are full of the polluted runoff from TV, internet pornography, texting, and social media.
Garbage in, garbage out, as the computer programmers say. It’s far beyond the scope of this article to examine all the garbage out there that passes as thought. We’ll look at a sliver, what can be termed group attribution. Beyond the quality that defines a large group, it is generally impossible to make a categorically true statement about all of the members of that group. Yet, the fallacy is ubiquitous across the political spectrum, from social justice warriors babbling about white privilege to alt-righters claiming that members of various races are inherently incapable of living together.

I don’t care. I don’t care about another fake news report. Even if it crashed the stock market by 300 points. I care about the consequences that the media should be required to make for reporting propaganda. What do you think the penalty should be for making the news instead of reporting it?
David DeGerolamo
CLARIFICATION of ABC News Special Report: Flynn prepared to testify that President-elect Donald Trump directed him to make contact with the Russians *during the transition* — initially as a way to work together to fight ISIS in Syria, confidant now says. https://t.co/ewrkVZBTbc pic.twitter.com/GQAKwT1Eda
— ABC News
Make sure that you watch the last minute of this video.
While I will admit that times are getting “sporty”, I still believe we are on the verge of a Renaissance. We only have to trust ourselves to prepare for the future. Our leaders are culpable in creating all of the issues that are not natural catastrophes like storms and earthquakes.
David DeGerolamo

Well that re-escalated quickly…
It’s been quite a year….
Big dip overnight was bought and as US equity markets prepare to open, Bitcoin just topped $11,000…