I just saw a meme on Western Rifle Shooters that rings true to me. “One day it will dawn on you that the people you ridiculed and dismissed as conspiracy theorists were just friends and family members who loved you enough to tell you the truth.”
After surviving sixty nine years of life, I’ve discovered that every institution of authority, every … single … one, has deceived us. Most of you reading this will acknowledge that; to a point. Michael Ellner has said, “Everything is upside-down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, governments destroy freedom, the major media destroy information, and religion destroys spirituality.” You will agree that the politicians lie to us, that the news media lies to us, that the entertainment industry programs us into immorality, that the medical industry feeds us poison and withholds cures. You will acknowledge that the military industrial complex is not about protecting America, but about making profits. Academia is about programming, not educating. Most would agree that our sons and daughters enter the military with patriotic intent, but are then used as mercenaries for the Empire. After their service, those that are wounded, physically and/or mentally, are left to deal with those problems on their own. The government that profited from their service deserts them to their damaged lives.
You’ve taken the red pill. You’ve descended down the rabbit hole. I congratulate you. You are the patriot. You are the one who wants a good life for your descendants. You cherish freedom and goodness. You are the man or woman who thinks for themselves and refused the clot-shot. You likely recognize that climate manipulation is poisoning the earth. You don’t buy the ‘official’ explanations for the JFK assassination, 911, Sandy Hook, Las Vegas, Waco, or Ruby Ridge. You likely have even come to the conclusion that the United States of America has become an evil empire. I could go on. The list is epic.
There is one topic that, for many of you, is the third rail. The one you dare not touch. It is the one that you and I have been programmed to believe from birth. It is the one our parents, grandparents, great grandparents, and on back for nearly two thousand years have been programmed to accept. It is the one that our European ancestors were forced to accept, much like many have been forced to accept other ideologies down through history. Can you guess what it might be?
Before I go on, I must emphasize that you may continue to ‘blue pill’ this subject. It is of no matter to me. My point in reaching out to you with this, is to attempt to awaken you to the understanding that other folks can come to different points of view and still unite with you for the greater good. We, all of us who consider ourselves bound for the preservation of the good, the true, and the beautiful, have got to unite. We cannot afford the luxury of fighting among ourselves while the forces of evil overwhelm us.
Some years ago, I viewed a YouTube video interview featuring the Reverend Billy Graham. In the interview, the host asked Graham if there was more than one way to get to heaven. Graham said, yes, there is. When I mentioned that to a member of my family, he replied, “Billy Graham never said that.” I then showed him the video. His response? He shook his head and declared, “He didn’t say that.” He then turned on his heel and left the room. It occurred to me, then, that he was programmed to the point that no amount of evidence could dissuade him from his belief.
If you believe that you, and you alone, have the absolute spiritual truth, that it is impossible that you are wrong, and that you will shun and abandon any who disagree with you, then read no further. I know from comments to previous posts I’ve made here that there are some in this community and who frequent this site, who are of this ilk. I know that some will even ‘break fellowship’ over disagreements over the interpretation of the Book of Revelation. If you are that one, I give you fair warning. Read … no … further. Realize, however, that you have painted yourself into a corner with very few allies. So few, that you will never achieve the victory in this life that you so sorely desire.
As for the rest, I am you ally. I will fight with you. I will not forsake you. Even though I may disagree with you on spiritual things, we agree on so many others. If we are to salvage people of European heritage in this country, we have to unite. We have to fight shoulder to shoulder. That means we have to trust one another. Slandering, brow-beating, bullying, and ridiculing’s accomplish nothing but the destruction of that trust.
For those of you with an open mind, for those of you who are willing to accept the comradeship of one who may not be aligned with you on matters of faith, for those of you who are skeptical of what you’ve been programmed to believe, I offer the following. It is a short book I’ve written on my walk and where the red pill took me spiritually. I offer it so as to give evidence that one can come to a difference of opinion on spiritual matters using study, research, logic, and reason. Who is right? We’ll all find out later. You’ll need to access it via Telegram. Just click the link below.
In my 72 yrs, one thing I have learned in my human condition is that I know but a little, I do not know if there is but one path to God and his son Jesus Christ. I know that the ruler of this world is satan, because he offered it to Jesus Christ after his 40 days in the desert. The greatest sin in my opinion is getting in the way of someone’s spiritual growth. This iis just my opinion.
You seem to have missed the point to Malachi’s post. Some of us, like Malachi and myself, do not follow the path of your god and his son. Nor do we believe in your Satan and certainly not as ruler of the world. Christianity is foreign to me and my ancestors had their own rich traditions long before a Jewish god of the Middle East was forced upon them. I agree that it is wrong to get in the way of another’s spiritual growth and that it is a path that one must choose for themselves. Consequently, while I do not follow the same path as you, I will respect your right to follow it, so long as it doesn’t interfere with me doing so down my own path.
The question before you is: can you unite with those whose faith truly differs from yours? I mean truly differs, not atheist, not agnostic, not in denial while secretly believing in your faith and your god. Differs in ways such as not believing in sin, not believing in the resurrection of Jesus, not believing in the concept of being damned and needing to be saved. Not accepting doctrine such as “turn the other cheek, or render unto Ceasar that what is Ceasar’s?”
See when you have to define our differences, are you attacking my beliefs? As far as turning the other cheek, sin, does that also include their are not absolutes, just do as it pleases you? I thought his article was about uniting no? Most people misinterpret turning the other cheek, they have been lied to by the modern day leaders of the church. No one forced me to believe in the God of my understanding and the Lord Jesus Christ, believe as you will it is not my path but yours alone. You condemn all jews is that your path? If I come face to face with my enemy I will not ask if he believes as I do.
I state and define our differences in the hope that we can begin to understand each other. Understanding being the antithesis of hate. How is stating that my beliefs are different and that I don’t adopt your belief as my truth attacking you or your beliefs? This causes me to suspect the basis of your faith.
With respect to “just do as it pleases you?”, to a degree, yes, at least to the extent that it isn’t harming another. I believe that there are consequences for actions, but that those consequences are received in the here and now, not the result of divine judgement. At the same time, any society, from a tribe to a nation requires certain rules and customs to function. This does not, however, necessitate the existence of the State or Church.
I am no biblical scholar and I interpret turn the other cheek as a forced passivity in the face of aggression. My interpretation may be wrong, but it is based upon what I see in practice today.
What gives you the idea that I condemn (express complete disapproval of) all Jews or Judaism? Judaism is a religion for Jews. Christianity is for Christians. I don’t condemn either, but I don’t believe they are for me or the religion of my ancestors, though the latter was forced upon them by a few historic empires. Like with the “attacking your beliefs”, it seems that you view any non-acceptance of, or agreement with, your belief / faith as either condemnation or attack. Why? That doesn’t make sense.
Again, the fundamental question before you is: Can you accept and recognize those whose religious beliefs are different or even contradictory or orthogonal to yours as allies or does this automatically make them your enemy?
So you have defined what you were saying, I am not condemning you or your beliefs.
Thank you. Have an upvote.
Thank you, let us move forward.
You have a poor understanding of the Bible. I don’t care if you ever open it either. Your attack was uncalled for. Someone stated their belief and you tried real hard to punch him in the nose.
What attack? Please tell me, and no, I don’t understand your vigor, nor do I believe it to be the ultimate truth.
“Differs in ways such as not believing in sin, not believing in the resurrection of Jesus, not believing in the concept of being damned and needing to be saved. Not accepting doctrine such as “turn the other cheek, or render unto Ceasar that what is Ceasar’s?”
What do we gain by uniting with false teachings? Or accepting a multitude of other lies provided by this world?
First John 2:18-26
The world and the evil spirits are trying to destroy and corrupt every last thing of Truth, we should not compromise with any lies nor evil in an attempt at “Uniting.”
Billy Graham? i am not a follower of.
i pray that His will be done and all possible are saved.
Do not understand my name(woA happy--) strange days.
Beautifully stated.
Elon Musk appoints Linda Yaccarino as head of twitter. I don’t use twitter or facebook. But she was/is a board member of the WEF. It never ends.
Malachi,I am aligned with much of what you teach. I am humbled and honored to receive what you have written. I would like to purchase 10 copies of your work. Much like the gift from the male nurse, I feel the Universe is directing me to offer your work to those with open doors.
Thank you.
Telegram @jnoni
Janice, No charge for the work. Sometimes all we think about is money. This is just my journey and my understanding. I’m not trying to evangelize, but if you think my humble effort is worth sharing with others, I’m honored. If you’ll send me your email address, I’ll send you a copy of the work with the images. The images make even more relatable.
Thank you for the book offer!
I have never understood people that argue and balk
when someone of the same essential faith has a different
interpretation. It is a pet peeve actually because either you
act in a way that honors your faith (Christian if so) and behave
accordingly, one isn’t really Christian.
An excellent article! This comment is regarding the comments, not the post.
I am glad the issue of the deck chairs arrangement, is finally getting resolved.
I have heard it said that, in past, people had two criteria for working with others:
First and formost is their work ethic.
A distant second is, do they keep their word?
Ultimately, little else matters.
A good read. I would much rather align with those who espouse freedom in order to defeat tyranny than find myself dying alone on principle. If we should ever find freedom and order in this country. May we then join to discuss our differences of belief regarding faith over a long smoke and tall pint.
I really like the way you think …
Very well said. Having watched the “likes” in this thread, I fear you are in the minority
A falling away?
Yahusha said to him, “I am the Way, and the Truth, and the Life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.
Pure and Simple TRUTH!
God’s job Follower. Not ours.
Our Also our choice to proclaim these Truths or go along to get along.
I note that Paul discussed with those “Pagans” and reasoned with them in the open marketplace.
He seemed able to “GET ALONG” with them, funny how a FULL-ON Pharisee Paul once known as Saul the DESTROYER of Followers of the WAY (as early Christians were known) could GET ALONG with anybody NOT A JEW.
You FEELING as Bold as Paul?
We can plant the seed, those that WANT TO HEAR will come back, see Acts 17:32 for details.
Acts 17:16-33
New Living Translation
Paul Preaches in Athens
16 While Paul was waiting for them in Athens, he was deeply troubled by all the idols he saw everywhere in the city. 17 He went to the synagogue to reason with the Jews and the God-fearing Gentiles, and he spoke daily in the public square to all who happened to be there.
18 He also had a debate with some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers. When he told them about Jesus and his resurrection, they said, “What’s this babbler trying to say with these strange ideas he’s picked up?” Others said, “He seems to be preaching about some foreign gods.”
19 Then they took him to the high council of the city.[a] “Come and tell us about this new teaching,” they said. 20 “You are saying some rather strange things, and we want to know what it’s all about.” 21 (It should be explained that all the Athenians as well as the foreigners in Athens seemed to spend all their time discussing the latest ideas.)
22 So Paul, standing before the council,[b] addressed them as follows: “Men of Athens, I notice that you are very religious in every way, 23 for as I was walking along I saw your many shrines. And one of your altars had this inscription on it: ‘To an Unknown God.’ This God, whom you worship without knowing, is the one I’m telling you about.
24 “He is the God who made the world and everything in it. Since he is Lord of heaven and earth, he doesn’t live in man-made temples, 25 and human hands can’t serve his needs—for he has no needs. He himself gives life and breath to everything, and he satisfies every need. 26 From one man[c] he created all the nations throughout the whole earth. He decided beforehand when they should rise and fall, and he determined their boundaries.
27 “His purpose was for the nations to seek after God and perhaps feel their way toward him and find him—though he is not far from any one of us. 28 For in him we live and move and exist. As some of your[d] own poets have said, ‘We are his offspring.’ 29 And since this is true, we shouldn’t think of God as an idol designed by craftsmen from gold or silver or stone.
30 “God overlooked people’s ignorance about these things in earlier times, but now he commands everyone everywhere to repent of their sins and turn to him. 31 For he has set a day for judging the world with justice by the man he has appointed, and he proved to everyone who this is by raising him from the dead.”
32 When they heard Paul speak about the resurrection of the dead, some laughed in contempt, but others said, “We want to hear more about this later.” 33 That ended Paul’s discussion with them,
Where did i imply i could not get along?
The worldly seem to be the intolerant ones.
Becoming set-apart, (in the world, not of the world.
Reasoning with the pagans only goes so far, look how Paul’s life was. How we believe he died. He did not unite with the Pagans or false gods.
He stood in the Truth.
Fighting to preserve America is a dead end. However, taking on the medical establishment on behalf of oneself or others sickened or injured directly, having experienced job loss, etc., or in cases of pets being sickened from exposure to Covid-19 vaccinated persons is perhaps timely with regard to national tensions and may be quite realizable and formidable in terms of outcomes sought against these theaters of operation, and with regard to influence over future pandemics and the quality of healthcare at large.
“Though it may be difficult to believe in the aftermath of COVID, the medical profession does possess a Code of Ethics. The four fundamental concepts of Medical Ethics – its 4 Pillars – are Autonomy, Beneficence, Non-maleficence, and Justice.”
Re: Autonomy:
“Full disclosure about the COVID vaccines – which were extremely new, experimental therapies, using novel technologies, with alarming safety signals from the very start – was systematically denied to the public. Full disclosure was actively suppressed by bogus anti-“misinformation” campaigns, and replaced with simplistic, false mantras (e.g. “safe and effective”) that were in fact just textbook propaganda slogans.
Blatant coercion (e.g. “Take the shot or you’re fired/can’t attend college/can’t travel”) was ubiquitous and replaced voluntary consent. Subtler forms of coercion (ranging from cash payments to free beer) were given in exchange for COVID-19 vaccination. Multiple US states held lotteries for COVID-19 vaccine recipients, with up to $5 million in prize money promised in some states.
Many physicians were presented with financial incentives to vaccinate, sometimes reaching hundreds of dollars per patient. These were combined with career-threatening penalties for questioning the official policies. This corruption severely undermined the informed consent process in doctor-patient interactions.
Incompetent patients (e.g. countless institutionalized patients) were injected en masse, often while forcibly isolated from their designated decision-making family members.”
Re: Beneficence:
“In medical ethics, beneficence means that physicians are obligated to act for the benefit of their patients. This concept distinguishes itself from non-maleficence (see below) in that it is a positive requirement. Put simply, all treatments done to an individual patient should do good to that individual patient. If a procedure cannot help you, then it shouldn’t be done to you. In ethical medical practice, there is no “taking one for the team.”
Re: Non-Maleficence:
“In simple terms, non-maleficence means that if a medical intervention is likely to harm you, then it shouldn’t be done to you. If the risk/benefit ratio is unfavorable to you (i.e., it is more likely to hurt you then help you), then it shouldn’t be done to you. Pediatric COVID mRNA vaccine programs are just one prominent aspect of COVID-era health policy that absolutely violate the principle of non-maleficence.”
Re: Justice:
“In a just situation, the wealthy and powerful should not have instant access to high-quality care and medicines that are unavailable to the rank and file or the very poor. Conversely, the poor and vulnerable should not unduly bear the burdens of health care, for example, by being disproportionately subjected to experimental research, or by being forced to follow health restrictions to which others are exempt.”
https://www.infowars.com/posts/the-four-pillars-of-medical-ethics-were-destroyed-in-the-covid-response/