States have the authority to prosecute illegal aliens for using stolen identities of American citizens to work illegally in the United States, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday.
In a 5-4 decision — with liberal Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan dissenting — the Supreme Court ruled against three illegal aliens who were prosecuted for stealing the identities of American citizens to work illegally in the state of Kansas.
Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas, John Roberts, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch wrote in their majority opinion that states do have the authority to prosecute individuals for crimes that overlap with federal law.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I have two questions:
- Why would the Supreme Court be involved in this states’ rights issue?
- Why was the decision not unanimous?
David DeGerolamo
My answers:
1. Simply because the SCOTUS usurped the lawmakers decades ago. They have become de facto legislators with lifetime anointments.
2. The four dissenting, blackrobed tyrants subscribe to one world government; NWO. They are not USC originalists, just as the majority, especially Roberts, are not ! Rather than make rulings or refrain from ruling, per the United States Constitution, they subvert and usurp and make LAW from the bench.
While all lawyers are worthless, the SCOTUS are the worst kind of lawyers….JUDGES !
“The first we do, let’s kill all the lawyers”.- William Shakespeare -- Henry VI, Part 2, Act IV, Scene 2
Any positive SCOTUS decision that should be a slam dunk is always tempered by the fact that some of them will vote against it.