What he completely fails to comprehend is, EXPONENTIAL FUNCTIONS. Like so many NPC (Non-Player Characters, misleading hayseeds) he believes total weight is a primary factor in the Kinetic Energy equation, E=MV^2. M representing Mass, is a Linear function. When drawn on a Cartesian Co-ordinate system (XY graph), the function is a straight line.
Where as Velocity squared is an Exponential function. When drawn on an X vs. Y graph, creates a curve upward. Think of it as doubling the count of rice grains, for each square on a chess board. Doesn’t seem like much on the first row, but by the time you get to the other side of the board, you’re talking national supply line quantities.
This is the very reason an aluminum projectile, such as a 767-200ER, could never penetrate the Twin Tower exterior box columns. Yet like his buddy Alex Jones, Joe Rogan will always try to insist airliners hit the WTC. Reality is, he’s either a complete DUMB ASS (blame it on getting hit in the head too many times) or a blatant liar. As for those who want to make excuses, start with Ionic Bonding of metals. In other words, the strength of structural grade steel(>10mm, or 3/8″th), in the shear plane, is quadruple that of aircraft grade aluminum(>5mm, 3/16″th).
But don’t let that stop you. Find an example that contradicts these facts. And please, don’t resort to the circular logic of ‘I saw it on TV’. I saw David Copperfield make the Statute of Hekate disappear off Liberty Island, that don’t mean it happened.
Not sure what matchbook you learned engineering from, but you might try talking to actual mechanical engineers. Mumbo jumbo and throwing words around that you don’t actually know the meaning of does not help your case.
Basic Diemaking,by National Tooling & Machining Association
Metallurgy fundamentals, by Daniel A Brandt
Fundamentals of Tool Design: 2ed, by Hoffman endorsed by Society of Manufacturing Engineers
Are a few, though they aren’t a set in the sense that they match.
But by all means, set me straight. Cite an example that backs your hypothesis. You can even use a velocity up to the speed of sound, which grants you four time the energy than an airliner can generate at sea level.
Then again, if you’d like to swing roosters over accreditation we can go there. Yet the highest truth is, Laws of Physics are 100% repeatable. Where is your example?
You do understand that people were physically present when this event happened. You see many of us do not believe the experts nor what the government narrative is, yet when you try to go to far, you loose us. What would happen, would an airliner bounce off?
Were they all actors, was it all false flag? You go to far. Some of us will not be removed from reality.
Nor do we believe or hold much with “magic.”
Do you mean “loose us” like that arrow was loosed?
Pretty sure you know what i was ‘a-getten’ at. chuckle!
My interpretation of your sentiment:
‘Do you standunder the opinions of those that were present, and capitulate they’re educated well enough to not be fooled by a set-up?‘
You mean like those who witnessed the B-25 Mitchel hitting the Empire State building, July 28th, 1945? Victims on the impacted floor “The building swung like a pendulum for thirty seconds…we had trouble keeping our feet under us as we ran for cover.”
Street level, where everyone agreed with the military officers on scene “It sounded like a can being crushed… then five seconds later, an explosion.”
And that was high test Av gas, which ignites like gasoline. Where as jet fuel is kerosene (diesel) and difficult to ignite.
‘What would happen, would an airliners bounce off?’
The B-25 did, as it’s fuselage was recovered on a lower rooftop mezzanine. What didn’t fall to the street level was brought inside by the military cleanup crew. (Pic) was during repairs, as the hole created was smaller than the 63′ wingspan.
Ref: The Sky is Falling, Weingarten And before casting doubt, read the authors preface. This assumes you can find a copy, as it can be difficult.
‘The eye will open, only when it wants to know’ ~AUK
The broadhead is made of steel, stainless steel, or sometimes titanium. The shaft is made of carbon fiber. I remember a friend who bought a bullet proof vest 20 years ago. He had someone stab the vest with a knife. It went through.
See what happens when people have to re-invent the wheel? The dagger was invented many centuries ago. So that it could pierce metal. Especially chain link armor so popular during the Middle Ages. With the advent of the long bow and the firearm, people lost that tidbit down the memory hole.
That was some science lesson. Not kidding. I bet if you took that compound bow and shot it like he did at a Chevy door, he’d poke a hole. Ask me how I know, iza door killer. Why he would not expect that to happen isn’t such a stretch. After all, the ancient equation still holds.
Bow poundage x Velocity x hauling ass pointy arrow + car door = hole. Usually.
After all, he’s just a guy that smokes weed and talks to people.
Don’t be sad, we still love you.
Agreed, and if you look into the MIT ‘research’ done by the Ocean engineering candidates(from China) who assisted an (unaccredited) engineering professor from Poland (a genuine Polock), you will see they used the very same trick. Instead of using Structural Grade Steel(>3/8″), they used thin gauge Sheet Metal bent into a shape (which they qualified as ‘structural’).
They impacted said sheet metal with a 1/4″ (three times thicker than aircraft sheet aluminum), in a rigged setup (ie not in free space, nor energy restricted). The Aluminum cut through the perpendicular parts, yet failed to shear through the parallel backside of the form (ie was not a complete shear through sheet metal).
Ever seen high pressure water cut through steel? I have.
And high pressure, high temperature steam is like a hot knife through butter with metal plate.
Both are correct, yet they both exceed the speed of sound, and exert force on a small area over a relatively longer period of time. ie the mass of water far outweighs the amount of material remove (aka the kerf). In addition, these system often use an abrasive to assist in cutting. And as most people don’t know, grinding is the fastest way to remove material.
But no one knew it was going to happen.
Testimony claims show planes hit the towers; many of us concur that it was all an inside job…from international intelligence to controlled demolition.
Another brain donor oxygen thief. Too stupid to grasp reality so they choose to remain in their fantasy world.
Don’t be so hard on yourself, we can’t all take formal studies in how things are made, for excessively extended periods of time. In order to make anything, you must first comprehend how it will fail.
Liquid is non compressible, so the 25 tons of fuel, after the aluminum vaporized, would blown through the building like a 400 mile an hour sledgehammer. As the fuel broke down into droplets, then vapor, you had a compressed fuel air explosion. That alone would remove all concrete from the steel substructure. It would also vaporize anything not made of steel.
have a look at the engines that power you through the stratosphere at Mach .82 . not only is there an immense fan disk ( holds onto those fan blades you can see at the front of the engine ) which transfers most of the thrust where it is supposed to go, each stage in both the compressor section and the hot turbine section have similar structures.
the material of these components before the combustion section is Titanium. after the combustor the expanding hot gas is tamed by various Nickle Chrome alloys. if you can, imagine a couple thousand pounds of precision manufactured metal that doesn’t give a flying foxtrot how your brains works.
what was left of the engines were what you saw with your own eyes coming out the other side of the buildings. but your limited brain could never figure that. the question why that was, … answers itself.
The ‘engines that you saw’ were never mounted in a Boeing 767-200, nor the ER model.
That’s according to John Lear, one of the most accredited pilots in U.S. history. His father also facilitated the manufacture of the Lear Jet, hence being name after himself. John Lear also testified as an expert witness to the SCOTUS, on this matter, yet the Bachelor of Arts degree holders ignored his science based objective evidence, supported by military documentation. (scientifically is not science, it’s ‘like science’)
matt, your mind is so open your brains fell out.
i wrote repair documents for ual for those engine parts ( the turbine section parts ) at the sfo jet shop.
the engines were PW4000 series for the 767. PW2000 for the 757. accelerate that much concentrated mass to high sub sonic mach and they will cut through a tower like butter. everyone saw it, even you.
you are foxtrotting clueless.
take up a safe hobby, perhaps painting. Van Gogh’s mental state was useful to his passion. your’s isn’t.
I did technical drafting for a world renowned engineer. He told me that the steel beams were on top of the columns. The columns did not have to be sheared, only the top connection had to be broken.
The exterior box columns supported about 40% of the structure’s weight. Did he account for the floors backing the columns? While they were aluminum clad, that was for weather/corrosion protection, the underlying columns were still structural steel. Structural grad steel (min 3/8″) for the towers was about 88Ksi, Aircraft sheet aluminum for 767s doesn’t exceed 26Ksi, and is gauge thick, >1/4″ (but about half that).
I have no aversion to being proven wrong, it just has to be physically possible. Even ran for office, giving prime examples, no one has yet to cite a repeatable example over the past decade. Even the engineering professors, at NCSU, agree with my statements, until they realize what’s being referenced. Then it becomes ‘must have been like a cheese grater'(asst mech eng dept head), ‘we can’t help you with that, you’re barred from campus for a year b/c you made the (pretty) secretary feel uncomfortable'(David Hass, asst dept head of physics), ‘well this (rigid) setup says it can happen’ (using unrelated materials)~ Mech eng dept head (over the phone, as he wouldn’t lie to my face). The list only gets more humorous the lower the standing.
The mental gymnastics to remain an accepted member of society is astounding. In the end, no one has accepted the challenge. Or, if they did, they come to realize they were wrong, so they drop it to save face. Did a two page write up, they wouldn’t even correct the grammar mistakes.
since you’re still babbling incoherently, i’ll mention the landing gear. you know, those three things that are absolutely useless in flight.
they’re tucked neatly into the the airframe when the plane is working for a living. the one in front is much smaller but it is stored parallel to the direction of flight. they’re hollow tubes of steel. the associated actuating linkages are quite solid, quite thick. the alloy composition allows them to be heat treated, very precise heat treating, to about 300,000 psi tensile strength.
ram those where your brain doesn’t shine at mach .82 and see what happens.
The worst part about allowing your disinformation, is someone will take you serious. And while I’m writing you off as an agent, you certainly make a compelling argument for human extinction.
Then again, that’s your objective, muddy the water to make the public appear mentally ill.
i have noticed before, usually with people who describe themselves, accurately or not, as leftists. i just call them totalitarian freaks.
i have noticed that either those people are mad, or i am.
matt, either you’re batshit crazy or i am.