I was researching exactly that this morning. So, let me make the devil's advocate argument as I understand it, and why the NGO and DC elite class are fighting to hard to keep the current system.
— DataRepublican (small r) (@DataRepublican) April 3, 2025
One-way free trade functions economically in the same way open borders do. Yes,…
CADD Graphics
Carolina Readiness Supply
Websites
NC Renegade on Twitter
NC Renegade on Gab
NC Renegade on Truth Social
Wes Rhinier on Gab
12 Round Blog
Barnhardt
Cold Fury
DanMorgan76
Defensive Training Group
The Deth Guild
The Feral Irishman
First in Freedom Daily
Forloveofgodandcountry's Blog
Free North Carolina
Knuckledraggin My Life Away
Liberty's Torch
90 Miles From Tyranny
Professor Preponomics
Publius-Huldah's Blog
Straight Line Logic
The Tactical Hermit
War on Guns
Western Rifle Shooters Association
Categories
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- highmaintenancelowtolerance on Igbo Day
- Don't mind me on A Good Analysis
- nines on Igbo Day
- Defiant Grunt on Igbo Day
- TakeAHardLook on Igbo Day
Archives
Meta
She is very good.
https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1908019051676434850
1) 1996 Nancy Pelosi encourages all of Congress to back reciprocal tariffs
2) 2008 Bernie Sanders wants tariffs, says jobs are going overseas
3) 2018 Barack Obama calls for reciprocal tariffs
4) 1988 Donald Trump says foreign countries must pay tariffs
As always, this is just the same old typical deal, over and over and over. ‘They’, the same ol’ lying thieveing sons of bitches(thier mothers do bark) comntiune to f**k the American citizen untill we bleed out.
This is all just like the X-Files, to quote Mulder, “I want to believe”. But Believe in what?
DR’s analysis of the effect of “one-way free trade” is accurate. I’m curious about the intent and agenda of its supporters: Do they approve of it because of that effect? Were it to function otherwise, would they distance themselves from it?
Kids of my generation were taught in school that tariffs are important for nurturing “infant industries.” Supposedly, that was Hamilton’s argument for them. Jane Jacobs, in her book “Cities and the Wealth of Nations,” makes essentially the same argument, specifically to improve the economies of “backward cities.” But how are tariffs mainly employed today: to protect MATURE industries that are threatened by innovation and population trends. Something’s rotten in Denmark, no?
The whole subject of tariff policy in the 21st Century needs a fresh look. I rather suspect we’d find that many politicians engaged with the subject are less than candid about the reasons for their positions on it. I’ll be writing about this myself.