That’s Just Crazy Talk! You Conspiracy Theorist Have Lost Your Mind!

Two new films, the Obama-produced ‘Leave the World Behind’ on Netflix and Alex Garland’s ‘Civil War,’ have been wrapped up in the right’s latest conspiracy.

The trailer for Civil War, a new film about the crack up of America from Alex Garland and A24, dropped like a bomb on the internet. The film is coming out next year in April, it’ll tell the story of a war journalist, played by Kirsten Dunst, traveling with her family across the U.S. as the country goes to war with itself. Right wing grifters online have already decided that the film is “predictive programming”—an example of shadowy deep state elites using their control of the media to prepare the population for an actual civil war.

This is, of course, bullshit.

Read the Whole Article Here…

    
Plugin by: PHP Freelancer
This entry was posted in Editorial. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
brewer55
brewer55
11 months ago

Conspiracy Theories should be known as spoiler alerts now.

Phil
Phil
11 months ago

let the deep state get their civil war because what they wish for will not go their way even with all their technical prowess. Each and every one of the vermin will have targets on their heads since they started the war. The deep state perpetrators will not be allowed to sleep soundly anymore after what they started. There will be a sniper’s rifle at 1000 yards under every blade of grass and there will be no prisoners, no trials and no juries for these communist vermin who have taken control of the government.

Michael
Michael
11 months ago
Reply to  Phil

Phil have you ever researched what the IRA targeted?

OPM
OPM
11 months ago

Interesting how the so called Conspiracy Wacko Nut Jobs are now heralded as being correct and sought out on radio/tv and asked the big questions: How Did You Know? Were there signs? and Whats Next?

Louis Jenkins
Louis Jenkins
11 months ago

Let them start their war and we will end it for them. It may be bloody and we may spill our blood, but what choice do we have? Better to die standing up, than die on our knees.

David
David
11 months ago

Arrogance at it’s finest. Some thoughts:
https://drp314.substack.com/p/do-you-need-an-f15

Michael
Michael
11 months ago

Meanwhile Lawfare is the preferred weapon of Democrats.

Oregon Dems Ban Republicans From Running for Office -- Daniel Greenfield / Sultan Knish articles

An excellent article that also discusses the differences between Democracy (a dozen wolves and 6 sheep voting what’s for dinner) and the reasons our founding fathers set up our Republic.

Michael
Michael
11 months ago

Nothing says “OUR Democracy” better than:

Associated Press
Colorado Supreme Court, in landmark ruling, bans Trump from state’s ballot under insurrection clause.

Yeah, we will do a counter suit and all that BUT if they can keep him off the ballot through the voting timeframe…well…

Lawfare. Democrats prime weapon, CORRECTION Uni-Party’s prime weapons as clearly both the Repugs and Demons work hand in hand.

EddieHnatko
EddieHnatko
11 months ago

Well by gosh by golly, guess I don’t have to be concerned ’bout no CW on account the left says I’m just a crazy CT. ‘Cept the left is actually pushing the button to start it. So, whatcha waitin’ for? Let’s party.

Martha
Martha
11 months ago

“Civil War” sounds like a possibility (haven’t seen it yet); don’t waste your time with “Leave The World Behind” -- that was terrible on many levels. The one Truth within would’ve been “Death to America.”

Diva of Dance
Diva of Dance
11 months ago

“Predictive programming is a long-running conspiracy theory that claims powerful Hollywood elites are using the media to program the populace.” If predictive programming isn’t real-in-purpose to convince us to support an agenda, then why was Hollywood making WWII movies during the war? Wasn’t it to make us feel better about sacrifices at home while our young men sacrificed their lives and futures overseas? I think predictive programming has two sides of the artistic coin. One side convinces us that our participation in making something happen is noble, and the second side says our participation in stopping something from happening is noble. It’s up to the individual to decide which is which.