One day, at the edge of a meadow, a fox came upon a boar honing his tusk against a hardwood tree. The fox stopped and asked ‘Why are you doing that?’…’There is no wolf pack to be heard. The huntsman is not mounted, scouting the fields. You are wasting time, when you could be enjoying this fine weather.’
The boar replied ‘When the battle comes, there is no time to prepare.’
Least we forget, Aesop’s fables are very much admissible in a court of record. You should sharpen your mind before it’s too late. And if all else fails, and you must appeal, remind them of the Wolf a/t Lamb, aka the Cat a/t Cock.
Also keep in mind, Law is from the Latin for ‘ultimate’ or highest truth. The laws of physics are 100% repeatable, by definition. If it were a court of law, they wouldn’t base their opinions on ‘facts’ generated by approved administrators/administratrixs. In other words, they’re giving your a heads up that truth will not be tolerated.
This fable dovetails perfectly with today’s governance’s. There is no law or justice because of the multi tiered system that is now operating around the world. It is just a mater of time before the wheels come off this wagon.
huh?
Aesop’s fables are admissible in a court of law? I have the same response as you.
Should I change my handle to Sergeant Schultz, would that make you feel better? More than happy you responded, but you have to give me something to work with. As a member of the BAR (Joanna, not me), how much do you know about the origins of the court system? What was the role of the court Jester?
The point being, if you don’t know what started the problem, how can you propose a suitable remedy? This is not a beratement, b/c I enjoy learning and I want to know what makes you think I’m wrong. One of the better advantages of being a male, is the Hierarchy of Men.
So I’ll defer/hyperlink to someone more knowledgeable than myself.
PS Congratulations, you’ve reduced me to using excessive personal pronouns.
And just so you know, I know. Ad Homonym attacks do not bode well, so doubts are high you will respond. Hope to be wrong on that point.
@DRenegade, again we don’t have courts of law, we have courts of record. We also have genetic memory, which is why the BAR misuses the term law. The only ‘law’ (highest truth) we acknowledge is the Bill of Rights. Everything else is a statute(felony/misdemeanor), ordinance(infraction), and the worst public detriment, bureaucratic policy (every court rule the BAR fabricates for their convenience/extortion, every over reaching police action such as hands behind your back, MOST OF WHICH VIOLATE THE BILL OF RIGHT).
Other examples of over reaching policies, going through security checkpoints to access pubic services, QUALIFIED IMMUNITY, derogatory police records that have no checks nor balances, ATF firearms registry, the list is endless.
You can make a record of Prisoner of War protections by the Geneva Convention, witch bar POWs from being masked against their will nor subject to medication w/o being being sick. Doesn’t mean a civil court judge is going to acknowledge it over Wake Co. court policy (and I’ll sign an affidavit to that fact).
Apparently my secret decoder ring is out of date as well, cuz I got no F’ing clue either. LOL.
I think he means get ready. The law isn’t on our side.
New info to some.
This will not end until it is ended | Eatgrueldog
In matters such as His Law verses man’s law:
Lead us not into trial but deliver us from evil.
Luke 12:12 also comes to mind: for the Ruach ha’Qodesh (set-apart Spirit)shall teach you in that very hour what you should say.”