For me, this still is indecent exposure and a sign of mental illness. What kind of parents would take their children to a “pride” parade?
David DeGerolamo
Plugin by: PHP Freelancer
Subscribe to NCRenegade via Email
Carolina Readiness Supply
Websites
NC Renegade on Twitter
NC Renegade on Gab
NC Renegade on Truth Social
Wes Rhinier on Gab
12 Round Blog
Barnhardt
Cold Fury
DanMorgan76
Defensive Training Group
The Deth Guild
The Feral Irishman
First in Freedom Daily
Forloveofgodandcountry's Blog
Free North Carolina
Knuckledraggin My Life Away
Liberty's Torch
90 Miles From Tyranny
Professor Preponomics
Publius-Huldah's Blog
Straight Line Logic
The Tactical Hermit
War on Guns
Western Rifle Shooters Association
Categories
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- a follower on Well … Here We Go
- Nobody on S400
- phil1350 on Beyond Consequence
- tom finley on S400
- oldcoyote on Election Interference
Archives
Meta
Stupid is what stupid does. And this wasn’t the worst of it.
The parents are just as guilty as the perverts and deserve the same recompense.
I was assigned to the “Pride” parade my last year as a Police Officer. I don’t understand why anyone would go to watch a bunch of perverts.
it makes want to Vomit all over the Biden and Past Obama administration. These are sick demoniac perverts let loose out of their cages. these are non-humans.
pool of human filth…
I cannot grasp why parents would expose their children to this perversion. There were several children that looked horrified and the other children cheering I don’t believe did that without the parent telling them to. It is child abuse in my opinion and in your face perversion. Modern day Sodom and Gomorrah…and we know how that turned out.
Where are the local law enforcement. This is obviously indecent exposure.
God help us
Good comments all.
We are on our own, friends.
There are literally none of our vaunted institutions left to uphold decency.
From the law to the judiciary to the boy scouts, all gone.
Maintain your honor.
There will be much blood.
There are perverts in prison for having sent pictures of themselves to individual children over the internet, but it is okay to parade around naked live in front of large groups of children? What am I missing? Why aren’t these who are doing these things, along with those who promote such things, in the lowest dungeon? If these people who do this are harmless, then the parents shouldn’t mind being cell mates with them.
Amen to that, pastor.
“What kind of parents would take their children to a “pride” parade?” Indoctrinated people. People desperate to appear woke Perverts. Democrats following their programming.
What are kids doing there in the first place?
What is any decent human being doing there?
I don’t think there were any decent (adult) human beings there.
Precisely. The so-called parents who bring their children to these degrading and satanic events think they are decent people but, of course, they are not. They don’t know the meaning of decency, let alone what is pure and godly.
What the UN is doing is getting us used to consensual adult/ children sex. It’s called SDG16. A war is being waged against each and every one of us right now, and it is a battle for full-spectrum dominance over every single aspect of your life: your movements and interactions, your transactions, even your innermost thoughts and feelings and desires. Governments the world over are working with corporations to leverage technology to control you down to the genomic level, and they will not stop until each and every person who resists them is subdued or eliminated.
The ICJ partners with the UN and WHO
“ In March of this year, The ICJ published its “8 March Principles.” Its alleged objective was “to offer a clear, accessible and workable legal framework — as well as practical legal guidance — on applying the criminal law to conduct.”
In “8 March Principles,” the ICJ advocates:
With respect to the enforcement of criminal law, any prescribed minimum age of consent to sex must be applied in a non-discriminatory manner. Enforcement may not be linked to the sex/gender of participants or age of consent to marriage. Moreover, sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual in fact, if not in law. In this context, the enforcement of criminal law should reflect the rights and capacity of persons under 18 years of age to make decisions about engaging in consensual sexual conduct and their right to be heard in matters concerning them.
This language opens up the distinct possibility that predatory paedophiles, should they ever be charged, may be able to offer mitigation if they or their lawyers can convince their child targets to testify that they gave their consent.
As we know, coercion is a common paedophile practice. Many child protection organisations—the UK-based National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) among them—recognise that coercion is part of the grooming process:
Grooming is a process that involves the offender building a relationship with a child, and sometimes with their wider family, gaining their trust and a position of power over the child, in preparation for abuse.
Following publication of “8 March Principles,” the ICJ responded to criticism by presenting some straw man arguments.
First, the ICJ said it did not “call for the decriminalization of sex with children.”
Second, the ICJ said it did not suggest “the abolition of a domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex.”
Third, the ICJ explained that it was simply offering clear legal guidance to “parliamentarians, judges, prosecutors and advocates.”
True, quite clearly the ICJ did not advocate decriminalising paedophilia.
True, quite clearly the ICJ did not advocate the abolition of the age of consent.
But . . . the ICJ did, quite clearly, introduce the notion, in law, that a child has the “human right” to consent to being raped by an adult.
It is far from clear how lawmakers should interpret this “legal framework and practical legal guidance.”
It is abundantly clear, however, that the ICJ has introduced legal ambiguity where there should be absolutely no legal ambiguity at all.
https://unlimitedhangout.com/2023/06/investigative-series/sdg16-part-1-building-the-global-police-state/
Pride show participants, priests, school teachers, three three branches of government are grooming your kids- making them “ comfortable” about being sexualized. Biden likes this. Grooming is a process that involves the offender building a relationship with a child, and sometimes with their wider family, gaining their trust and a position of power over the child, in preparation for abuse.
The man twerking in his tight whities is grooming your children in a Pride parade. Biden made it legal.
He most likely is a federal pervert judge or government worker.
The silent complacent majority has failed the children.
I call that a target rich environment.
They are vile, filthy, immoral TRASH!!!
Is it mostly white people that participate in this filth? I see a few other colors but mostly white. What the hell is with these people. There has to be something that is causing this self destructive insanity.
The silent majority is complacent. The UN is taking your liberty away.
when he passes from life unto death, he will get all the pelvic thrusting he wants.