Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power that knowledge gives.
— James Madison
Many, if not most, who vote in a Presidential election consciously realize that both the Democratic and Republican candidates are not worthy of support but they cast their votes under the premise of supporting “the lesser of two evils.” This is often explained asrealistic since one of the two major political party’s candidates will win the election. Such “logic” is faulty and injurious to our liberty. Voters need to vote in light of the obvious truth that no substantial difference exists between Barack Hussein Obama and Willard “Mitt” Romney. Understanding and applying this simple truth – that no substantial difference exists between the 2 major candidates – is liberating. Casting a vote for either Obama or Romney will advance tyranny since both candidates are committed statists who despise the Constitution.
The correct practical strategy is to cast a vote for anyone other than Obama or Romney who appears on the ballot. The establishment will see that a growing number of the electorate refuse to be manipulated by false rhetoric. If either Obama or Romney “win” with less than 50% of the vote this will be a victory for liberty. Voting third party will help foster real political change as the voters help the paradigm shift from the phony “Left vs. Right” conflict to the legitimate battle of the State vs. individual liberty. Well meaning but manipulated voters continue to vote for tyranny based upon a terribly misplaced allegiance to the 2 major political parties. When Patrick Henry wrote, “Give me liberty or give me death” that was not a campaign slogan. As we continue to witness the treason of the federal government we realize that our ultimate political allegiance must be to the Constitution.
VOTING FOR THE “THIRD PARTY”? voting for a party that will not win is like taking buckets of water out of lake to bring the lake level down. Busting the dam to remove the water is quicker. Once the water (o’bama) is down and out then we can get things back to a level where we can rebuild the dam and hope to fill it with good fresh water to a new level. Our Muslem dictator must be removed first because the damage he has and can cause must be stopped. I’m not a fan of Romnoid but I’d rather have a business man in office than a business destroyer.
Voting for a presidential candidate who supports abolishing part of the Bill of Rights (NDAA) and the ability to declare war without Congressional approval as outlined in the Constitution is like throwing the last shovel of dirt on Liberty’s grave.
From the article,
Consider the import of the following quote from 1966 by Carrol Quigley who was a Professor of Political History at Georgetown University for 35 years. This quote is from his Magnum Opus Tragedy and Hope, a 1348 page book of world history:
“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can “throw the rascals out” at any election without leading to any profound or extreme shifts in policy.”- Carrol Quigley, Tragedy and Hope – A History of the World in Our Time pp. 1247-1248).
In 2008 Ron Paul openly cited Quigley as part of his rationale in refusing to endorse John McCain for President.
How will ensuring Obama wins a second term make the present situation better? We know there will be nothing left of this country after another 4 (or 2, or 1) yrs of Obama.
We have to separate the idea that the federal government represents America’s future. No one can argue that the institution that has destroyed the Constitution and enslaved our children with a debt of $130 trillion will be the same institution that will save us.
If your premise concerning Obama’s reelection is valid (and I believe that it is true that he will try to destroy the country through government), I have faith in our patriots and God for my security -- now and later.
Did you read the article where this excerpt came from?