The “sanction of the victim” is the willingness of the good to suffer at the hands of the evil, to accept the role of sacrificial victim for the “sin” of creating values.
Do not let yourself become a victim supporting evil.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Free PDF Download of The Great Taking
Mr Palmer: if it was up to me, I would consider referring charges 💥 pic.twitter.com/xfUJcRRglB
— Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸 (@KarluskaP) March 5, 2025
🔥Virginia Foxx just forced every last mayor at the hearing to admit just how much they have spent on ILLEGAL aliens over just the last 4 years:
— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) March 5, 2025
Chicago: $574.5 million
Denver: $79.0 million
New York City: $6.9 BILLION
Boston doesn't ask whether someone has citizenship status,… pic.twitter.com/8ymGscycQH
People receive the government that they deserve. Apathy breeds tyranny and fraudulent elections. I cannot help but wonder where the money really went since the streets of Democrat cities are littered with homeless and addicts.
The ruling concerning the USAID grant by the Supreme Court was Constitutional. They maintained the sanctity of a contract as defined below. I suggest people read the ruling and understand that it applies to a portion of one USAID grant, not all foreign aid. The ruling states that only work done prior to the Trump administration’s freezing of payments was in question. In other words, the work completed before the freeze had to be paid as per the contract.
This ruling was not about an activist judge; it was about the rule of law and the sanctity of a contract. But the interesting part is that the portion of the Constitution for contracts applies to States, not the federal government.
I may not agree with the excessive fraud and criminal acts of the Deep States but in this case, work completed should be paid. If there is any question as to the quality of the work or fraud, that is a separate matter.
What is surprising is how easily our “side” is misled by the twisting of the truth.
David DeGerolamo
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From Grok:
Referring to the principle of “ex post facto” laws, which is addressed in the U.S. Constitution. Specifically, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 states:
“No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.”
This means that Congress cannot pass a law that makes an act illegal after it has already been committed. In other words, a person cannot be charged with a crime if the law criminalizing that act was enacted after they performed it. This protection applies to the federal government. Additionally, Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 extends a similar restriction to the states, saying:
“No State shall… pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts…”
The term “ex post facto” (Latin for “after the fact”) refers to laws that retroactively change the legal consequences of actions that were committed before the law was enacted. The Supreme Court has interpreted this to primarily apply to criminal laws, ensuring that individuals are protected from being punished for something that wasn’t a crime at the time they did it. This is a foundational safeguard for fairness and due process in the legal system.
Dealing with the measles 1969 vs today pic.twitter.com/agI1Rq4xFR
— Being Libertarian (@beinlibertarian) March 4, 2025
🚨 WTF? An MSNBC host just said she hopes 13 year old cancer patient DJ Daniel doesn’t K*LL HIMSELF from having to deal with Trump supporters
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) March 5, 2025
These people are GENUINELY sick in the head.
Beyond disgusting. pic.twitter.com/9bndb2pdFy
Dems kneeled for 8 minutes and 46 seconds for a drug-infused violent criminal.
— Riley Gaines (@Riley_Gaines_) March 5, 2025
Laken Riley fought for her life for 18 excruciating minutes before it was taken by an illegal gang member — yet they couldn’t even *stand* to honor her family.
Really process that. https://t.co/kaVMYGJoOk
Best line of Trump's speech tonight is right here. Well done. pic.twitter.com/mvxgf0YHEl
— MAZE (@mazemoore) March 5, 2025
Look at Pelosi losing her shit!
— Patricia Lockwood🇺🇲 (@Patricia626262) March 5, 2025
Drunk as a🦨
😂🤣😂😂😂😂😂https://t.co/OLvzFrt4OX pic.twitter.com/hRlg8QccfF
And there you have it..
— Real Ben Garrison Cartoons (@GrrrGraphics) March 5, 2025
Best meme of the night pic.twitter.com/0TlWOS0ttp
BREAKING: BlackRock is taking control of two key Panama Canal ports from a Hong Kong company for $23B—just weeks after Trump called out China’s grip on the canal – NYP pic.twitter.com/RZ3SbCOuww
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) March 4, 2025
It’s a good thing it’s Tuesday and not Monday because I probably would’ve called in sick and gone back to bed after watching this video🤬. Let’s face it, buy some chickens because OUR GOVERNMENT SUCKS AND WE ARE ON OUR OWN😡! pic.twitter.com/igHwOVMRRt
— Bobby D🎙 (@robertdunlap947) March 4, 2025
Now we’re up to 22 Dem senators all doing the same cringe video simultaneously!
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 4, 2025
I will buy a Cybertruck for anyone can provide proof of who wrote this particular piece of propaganda.
First person to post proof in the replies to this post gets the truck! https://t.co/ILdATEXXTn
JUST IN: 🇷🇸 Chaos in Serbian parliament as opposition sets off smoke grenades and tear gas to protest against the government. pic.twitter.com/DBtOluCmSU
— BRICS News (@BRICSinfo) March 4, 2025
