North Carolina Renegades

Sanction of the Victim

The “sanction of the victim” is the willingness of the good to suffer at the hands of the evil, to accept the role of sacrificial victim for the “sin” of creating values.

Do not let yourself become a victim supporting evil.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ivermectin Dosages

Free PDF Download of The Great Taking

The New Declaration of Independence

NCRenegade YouTube Channel

NCRenegade Rumble Channel

Posted in Editorial | Comments Off on North Carolina Renegades

What They Are Hiding

Posted in Editorial | 1 Comment

End Times

Posted in Editorial | Leave a comment

Where Is the Monthly Treasury Statement?

Posted in Editorial | Leave a comment

Not Verified

Read the comments in X.

Posted in Editorial | 4 Comments

Grok on US Deficits

I asked Grok for the amount of the US deficits for the first eleven months of 2024 and then for the entire year of 2024. The total yearly deficit was less. So I then asked:

How can the total 2024 deficit be less than the first eleven months?

Answer

The situation where the total U.S. federal budget deficit for fiscal year 2024 being reported as lower than the sum of the first eleven months is typically due to a few reasons:

  1. Seasonal Adjustments and Timing: Government revenues and expenditures can have significant seasonal variations. For instance, certain tax revenues might spike at particular times of the year, like tax refunds or corporate taxes. If these occur late in the fiscal year, they could reduce the deficit for that month.
  2. One-Time Payments or Adjustments: Sometimes, there are one-time payments or adjustments in revenue or spending that can affect the final month’s figures. For example, if there was an unexpected surplus in tax receipts due to a legislative change or economic recovery, it could lower the final deficit.
  3. Budgetary Reclassifications: Occasionally, there might be reclassifications of certain items within the budget, which could technically reduce the reported deficit in accounting terms, even if the actual financial situation remains unchanged.
  4. Government Accounting Practices: Government accounting can differ from standard accounting practices. Adjustments might be made retrospectively or certain types of spending or revenue might not be accounted for in the monthly figures but are in the yearly total.
  5. Economic Factors: Unexpected economic growth or a significant drop in spending due to policy changes or emergency measures could lead to a lower deficit in the final month.
  6. Errors or Revisions in Initial Reports: Sometimes, initial monthly figures might be revised later. If there were overestimations in earlier months, these could be corrected in the final accounting.
  7. Offsetting Entries: There might be offsetting entries where money is moved between different budget categories or funds, which could give the appearance of a reduced deficit in the final accounting.

Given these points, while it might seem counterintuitive for the total deficit to be less than the sum of the first eleven months, it’s often due to a combination of these factors. In practice, this typically means that the last month of the fiscal year saw either a significant decrease in spending, an increase in revenue, or some form of adjustment or reclassification that wasn’t fully captured in or predictable from the monthly reporting.

Without access to specific details from the U.S. Treasury or the Congressional Budget Office for October 2024, these general explanations align with how such discrepancies are usually understood in fiscal reporting.

Posted in Editorial | 1 Comment

Grok Defining Our Government

Benjamin Franklin stated that we were given a Republic if we could keep it. Do you think he meant a democratic republic?

Answer

When Benjamin Franklin famously remarked, “A republic, if you can keep it,” he was indeed referring to the system of government established by the U.S. Constitution. While the term “democratic republic” wasn’t used in that exact context by Franklin, the essence of his comment aligns with what we would now describe as a democratic republic. Here’s why:

Context of Franklin’s Statement:

  • Constitutional Convention (1787): Franklin was responding to a question from Elizabeth Willing Powel about what type of government had been created after the Constitutional Convention. His comment was both an affirmation of the new system and a caution about its maintenance.

Understanding Franklin’s Republic:

  • Republic: Franklin, like many of the Founding Fathers, was influenced by classical republicanism, which emphasized the idea of a state as a “public matter” (from Latin, res publica) where government exists for the common good, not for a monarch or an aristocracy.
  • Democratic Elements:
    • The Constitution they framed included mechanisms for popular representation (e.g., election of the House of Representatives by the people).
    • However, it balanced this with indirect democracy elements, like the original method of electing Senators (by state legislatures) and the Electoral College for choosing the President, which were meant to temper direct popular influence.
  • Fear of Direct Democracy: Many framers, including Franklin, were wary of pure democracy, fearing it could lead to mob rule or tyranny of the majority. They designed a system where the voice of the people would be filtered through representatives and constitutional checks.

Franklin’s Concerns:

  • Maintenance of the Republic: Franklin’s “if you can keep it” suggests the republic’s survival depended on:
    • Civic virtue of its citizens.
    • The wisdom and integrity of its leaders.
    • The balance of power through checks and balances.
    • Education and informed electorate to uphold democratic processes.

Modern Interpretation:

  • Democratic Republic: Today, we recognize the United States as a democratic republic because:
    • Democratic: Citizens participate through voting for representatives, referendums, and other forms of direct or indirect influence.
    • Republic: It operates under a constitution, with elected leaders, not a monarchy or aristocracy.

Conclusion:

Given the context and the direction the U.S. has taken since Franklin’s time, it’s reasonable to infer that he meant the new nation was establishing a republic with strong democratic elements, what we would call a democratic republic. His cautionary note underscores the need for the citizens to actively engage in maintaining this balance between democratic participation and republican governance to prevent its degradation into less desirable forms of government. Thus, while Franklin’s exact phrase was “a republic,” the modern understanding of his words would encapsulate the democratic processes within that republic.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Grok:

can you generate a graphic of Franklin’s quote: “Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what they are going to have for lunch” that is not copyrighted

For accurate and up-to-date information about the 2024 U.S. Elections, please visit Vote.gov.

I generated an image with the prompt: ‘graphic of Benjamin Franklin’s quote: Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what they are going to have for lunch, public domain style’

Additional attempts to generate an image that was legible resulted in a blank graphic with Grok apologies for not being able to comply.

Posted in Editorial | Leave a comment

Helene Death Count

Posted in Editorial | 3 Comments

Reality Sinking In

Update:

I double checked on the veracity of the above video and it is eight years old. I saw the tweet and the WRAL account and missed that someone else reposted and quoted the original tweet. Thank you ColdSoldier for pointing this out.

David DeGerolamo

Posted in Editorial | 12 Comments

Polls

Posted in Editorial | 3 Comments

It Was Only a Matter of Time

Posted in Editorial | 4 Comments

Support Samaritans’ Purse

Posted in Editorial | 1 Comment

The Knock on Your Door

Posted in Editorial | 5 Comments

The Communist Playbook

Posted in Editorial | 5 Comments

Rush Limbaugh Is Laughing

Posted in Editorial | 2 Comments

Are You Prepared?

Posted in Editorial | 3 Comments