🇷🇺🤖Top Russian weapons according to AI
Russia has a range of powerful weapons in its arsenal. Some of the most notable include:
▪️RS-28 Sarmat (Satan 2): An intercontinental ballistic missile, claimed to have the capability to evade any current missile defense system.
▪️T-14 Armata Tank: A modern tank with advanced armor and a remotely controlled turret.
▪️Poseidon Nuclear Torpedo: An underwater drone designed to carry a nuclear warhead, potentially causing radioactive tsunamis.
▪️Su-57 Stealth Fighter: Russia’s most advanced fighter jet, designed for air superiority and attack roles.
▪️ S-400 Triumf Air Defense System: One of the world’s most advanced missile systems, capable of engaging multiple targets at various ranges.
These weapons are part of Russia’s strategic military capabilities, reflecting its focus on both nuclear and conventional military strength.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I recommend everyone do more research on the above weapons. Start with the Poseidon nuclear torpedo.
David DeGerolamo
Anyone who tells you Russian military is a joke, and US tech us far superior, is stuck in 1989.
If the past 2 years in Ukiestan haven’t proven how worthless The Patriot and Abrams systems are against a peer foe, you haven’t been paying attention.
Correction--they’re stuck in ‘1979’ not 1989.
The Poseidon is like the Tsar Bomba. I hope it is just a doomsday deterrent, never to be used.
We can’t track the subs that were specifically built to deploy the Poseidon, and we can’t track or eliminate the torpedo once it goes active and autonomous.
Do You Get It Yet? – Area Ocho Top Ameristan weapon of the military.
Seems like there is a ‘doom’s-day’ gap with Russia. I wish we had more doom’s-day weapons like Russia. For example that Poseidon nuclear powered, tipped with a 100 megaton warhead--jeeze! Image if we had a few babies like that!? Ivan wouldn’t dare blink if we fielded a few of these.
Don’t worry, General Aesop just posted two articles on this post for us.
The Poseidon doesn’t exist and nada, nada. Go read his military knowledge in full proud glory over there.
Is there anything Aesop’s not an expert on?
Well, we should be grateful HE’s keeping an eye on NC Renegade for us.
Need I add a sarc tag for the last sentence?
Green Hornet’s comment has it correct. Poseidon was created by Russia to keep America from getting nuke fever. Pity is that only works if your target audience is sane AND doesn’t think that AMERICA (Hooo Rahhh!!) is still THE SUPERPOWER of the world.
Odd how slinking out of Afghanistan and the FACT we’ve not won a war since WW2 simply rolls of their backs….
Between the idiots in District of Criminals, Think Tanks that say Ukraine is Winning and folks like Aesop, maybe the Russians are too rational to understand them.
Two articles, Buckwheat?
Common Core grad, or just need a new prescription?
I never said this doesn’t exist, I said it can’t be what it’s bullsh*t-splained to be.
So let’s look at the videotape, Captain Queeg:
As to the Poseidon, going strictly by that bastion of accuracy, Wikipedia, it’s
a) not a torpedo by any stretch of that term
b) not a “Doomsday bomb” on the order of Tsar Bomba
c) could carry a nuclear warhead in the 2 MT range (U.S. Titan missiles in the 1960s and 70s carried 10MT warheads, for comparison)
d) has an imaginary speed of 100kts (which would be about as tough to detect and track underwater as a Chinese New Year’s parade with fireworks
e) has no “tsunami creation” function nor intent.
We surface-tested a 15MT warhead in the Castle Bravo test (and had multiple other MT-range tests at Bikini Atoll), and no tsunami was created, anywhere, from any of them, period.
So “Radioactive tsunami-making torpedo” is three whoppers of total bullshit in just one line.
Speculation is that it uses a deep and very slow approach speed using satnav guidance (with no explanation of how they solved the physics problem of getting satellite signals down to 500 fathoms), only shifting to loud and stupid in terminal guidance mode, and that its warhead is deliberately dirtied up with cobalt. Which only works with surface detonation.
It’s main purpose with such a relatively modest warhead (nowhere near a “Doomsday” device would be as a very dirty conventional nuke, intended to contaminate the target area long-term and render it unusable, beyond the expected damage of a 2MT explosion.
So they’re intended to take out a port, particularly strategic naval bases like Norfolk, King’s Bay, Bangor, and Pearl Harbor.
Okay, great. Play that card.
20 minutes later, D-5 Trident IIs start popping and dropping like rain from half a dozen points at sea, and 95% of the Russian population is a distant memory for the next 100 years 30 minutes after that.
Followed in short order by the US, and then most of the Northern Hemisphere. Game Over.
Now Brazil and Australia get to fight for control of the world.
Who does that help?
What’s the point?
Some of us have been studying the details of nuclear war for decades, and when obvious vaporware bullshit of this magnitude pops up, it’s snort-worthy comedy.
At least when the Japanese hyperventilated about this, they came up with Godzilla, and made a buck.
The source article for this is stupidity marinated in rose fertilizer.
Make better choices.
Aesop, kindly list the sources for your many assumptions and your CV of learning so much about Nuclear Weapons and apparently submarine actions.
Size of warhead, perhaps?
It’s been about 65 years since the Atol tests, maybe your information might be a bit off? Perhaps the shape of the undersea area is different? Example, deep sea vs Chesapeake Bay shallow? Distance of radioactive water movement of but a few dozen miles to important targets like Ah, DC?
AND for the record is there ANYTHING Aesop isn’t an expert about?
Asking for many.
Remember, when you’re putting the tourniquet on, that you <i>asked</i> for this, Michael:
Jesus,Mary, and Joseph, man! Was telling you the info I referenced on Poseidon was <i>straight from the Wikipedia page</i> too hard to grasp?
Status-6 Oceanic Multipurpose System -- Wikipedia
Learn to use your mouse for something besides a cat toy.
And you figure the widely-footnoted and researched published data from the Bikini tests have transmogrified since they ended <i>sixty years ago</i>??
Nuclear testing at Bikini Atoll -- Wikipedia
Did the Nuke Fairy sneak in a leave bigger yields under someone’s pillow in the last six decades?
Did the Underpants Gnome steal the craters left there??
It’s not a question of the shape of the sea floor, it’s basic physics: little bombs (and in oceanic and geologic terms, they’re <i>all</i> little bombs) haven’t the ability to create tsunamis.
FFS, the 2004 Sumatra Tsunami was a 9.2 earthquake that ripped the faultline <i>19 miles down</i> below mean sea level, and ripped the faultline there for a distance of <b>810 miles</b>. You figure the Russians have got a warhead that can do that? You could do stand-up comedy at CalTech with that joke!
2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami -- Wikipedia
Here, let’s get you a booster chair at the elementary gelogic physics classroom for the 20 seconds it’ll take to clue you in:
“<i> The amount of energy released by the Hiroshima nuclear bomb was about 1012 J, whereas one magnitude 8.9 earthquake released about 1018 J of seismic energy (Figure 9). This is a million times more energy (i.e. a factor of 106) than the Hiroshima bomb.</i>”
That would be <b>15 GIGATONS</b> for Common Core grads, (15,000,000,000 tons: 15 BILLION with a B), or a single warhead as powerful as <i>258</i> Tsar Bombas.
Sh’yeah, whistle up one of those, please.
Earthquakes: 4.3 Seismic energy | OpenLearn -- Open University
How sad you couldn’t have pulled off two more mouseclicks before you jumped all over your junk.
And for the record, is there anything you <i>are</i> an expert about, or do you just latch on to everything you know <b>nothing</b> about and just dig in blind and start spouting off until you run facefirst into a brick wall of ignorance, over and over?
Nothing I told was anything you couldn’t have confirmed all by yourself without having your hand held like a toddler, and you could have saved yourself from having your diaper changed publicly, for only about the 200th time.
Learn to do basic research, and educate yourself, instead of letting your mouth run away with you when your data bank is in deficit. Seriously, please try it, if only for the novelty of that approach.
And yet again, stirring crap with me on someone else’s blog, without offering anything but the contents of your spleen. Color me shocked.
Why not go all in, and start your own, just so everyone can know which pronouncements to take the 180° opposite of?
And because I’m a nice guy, and hate to be rude to someone else on their own blog by having to educate you, if NC R decides this is just too painful to watch, I completely understand, so I’m archiving this answer and posting it on my blog, to memorialize this long-overdue moment in your education.
LOL again nothing answered. In your own blog a gentleman DID point out a Tsunami like effect from Atol Nuclear testing.
You’re quite the argumentative sort. You’ll happily dance around the questions.
Nice guy? Check webster about that. Pre-COVID you were a decent sort, worth discussing things with but have morphed into something different.
How large a nuke within a few miles of the costal shelf of America say around LA or Newport or DC would be needed for a rather nasty bit of radioactive sea water splashing around the area?
YES, YES, Not a Tsunami in the terms of Webster. The effect upon the target area might argue differently.
Wikipedia? Almost a worthy site but written by amateurs and I’d not guess how accurate that entry is for technical details UNLESS Aesop himself wrote the article and put a technical lock on it.
Doomsday weapons are advertised to PREVENT Doomsday. A Not so fast MAD Think Tank about defeating Russia to field strip it of assets, like we were doing before Putin took over.
In a way I am honored the mighty Aesop is so annoyed to prove himself again in a battle of wits with an apparently unarmed Opponent like myself.
Go kiss your mirror again Hero.
Aesop what happened to you? Over the last few years you’ve become bitter, angry, even ugly. Anyone who has an opinion that is contrary to yours you pounce on them, going out of your way to belittle them.It’s sad really.
It all started with the Matt Bracken buffalo jump incident back in Trump’s presidency. He divided himself from the community right there. Bracken too but Bracken is a bigger name so he was able to bounce back after laying low for a bit. Aeslop has always been that way, but after the buffalo jump party when the COVID scam was unveiled he went all in on it being that he is a bed pan changer.
When that scam fell apart and was revealed to be what we know it is now he doubled down on that but moved onto Ukrainian meth. That has been a huge failure for him and he is basically going around pissed off at the world because he was wrong as F about it. His audience is a few brain dead Boomers who for some reason are too stupid to read for themselves or just see stuff through his rose tinted glasses. Now he just attacks everyone for anything/everything. It was always there it just took some world events to bring it out of him for everyone that kinda knew to fully see. Now that it’s out there he knows we know so he just goes with it now.
I’m actually surprised he cited wiki as a source. If you did that on his site he would bash the F outta you for doing it.
Yep, he’s become a grade A a@@hole. Quite sad really.
Good Lord, this clown is the biggest tool on the internet, bar none.
Some how i am 100% positive he will weave and forge that into cape and crown.
“….so I’m archiving this answer and posting it on my blog, to memorialize this long-overdue moment in your education.”
WAA….
How Taylor Lorenz of him.
There was a time when America had God’s protection and strength. That time appears to have been rejected. Such stupid peaoe.
A wise man would behold that this is the final chapter in this bastard’s presidency; 12 months more with our pants down around our ankles. Our enemies have one year to make their move. They won’t wait to face a trump White House. Prepare accordingly.
The amount of energy required to move enough water to generate a tsunami is at LEAST an order of magnitude greater than ANYTHING humans possess. The ONLY way a nuke could cause a tsunami is if it was detonated directly on a subsea fault AND that detonation triggered a large enough earthquake. Otherwise NO nuclear war head can or will cause a tsunami. The claims about the Poseidon are bullshit Russian propaganda. And propaganda is about the only thing the Russians are consistently good at. They are bullshiting about the Poseidon and they without doubt bullshitting about their other “capabilities”. Stop carrying dirty water for Putin.
LOL you might want to read the Atol testing results Dan.
They indeed DID have Tsunami like effects from the underwater testing BUT Atol has no real shallow water shelving like America’s East and West Coast.
But since you brought that up what fault lines around Aesop’s beloved Los Angeles are often shuddering? New beach front property someday? Half life would be an issue for generations.
Tsunami like effects are MASSIVELY different from an actual tsunami. A tsunami is caused by the PHYSICAL MOVEMENT of water generally from either an earthquake or a landslide. A nuclear detonation does NOT directly impart energy of movement to water. It doesn’t PUSH the water. It merely displaces it temporarily . The testing sites in the Pacific NEVER saw the very flat and low islands near the test sites flood. You could detonate a 20 Megaton device in Long Beach Harbor and while the port and the buildings immediately adjacent would be destroyed the city itself would suffer no flooding. Radiation fallout…but no flooding. No. The Poseidon is just another terror weapon counting fear far more than efficacy. The Russians are NOT the technical wunderkinds they want the world to think they are.
Dan, you don’t listen well and BTW please LINK some technical data to support your awesome Long Beach Harbor thesis.
And that the low islands NEVER…. Links please.
Unlike a blogger deity you worship I will accept when I am incorrect when faced with Facts, not Aesop recycled debris.
Look up nuclear shaped charge, Casaba howitzer or Orion Project.
[…] be posted. I really do not care whether Aesop reposts his comment on his site but I did approve his comment in this […]