https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYndkzq5oTY
CADD Graphics
Carolina Readiness Supply
Websites
NC Renegade on Twitter
NC Renegade on Gab
NC Renegade on Truth Social
Wes Rhinier on Gab
12 Round Blog
Barnhardt
Cold Fury
DanMorgan76
Defensive Training Group
The Deth Guild
The Feral Irishman
First in Freedom Daily
Forloveofgodandcountry's Blog
Free North Carolina
Knuckledraggin My Life Away
Liberty's Torch
90 Miles From Tyranny
Professor Preponomics
Publius-Huldah's Blog
Straight Line Logic
The Tactical Hermit
War on Guns
Western Rifle Shooters Association
Categories
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Stan Sylvester on Did George Patton say the US fought on the wrong side in WWII?
- Patriot_One on Will This Be Expanded?
- Patriot_One on Will This Be Expanded?
- Patriot_One on Judge Jeanine
- Patriot_One on Did George Patton say the US fought on the wrong side in WWII?
Archives
Meta
This is all going to get out of hand and people won’t take it much longer. Something has to break…!
She should of also stated that the CDC in May released a study stating mask do not good.
At the risk of being seen as carrying water for the pro-mask crowd, if you believe in the Constitution, a property owner’s rights (in this case, the store owner’s rights) are superior to the shopper’s rights. If the store owner required every shopper to wear a cowboy hat in order to enter his store, that would be his right. “His ‘house,’ his rules.” Don’t like wearing a cowboy hat? Shop elsewhere (if you can).
Outside the store, the shopper’s rights become paramount.
If anyone disagrees with the mask mandate–and, obviously, many do–they should take it up with the government that issued the mandate to businesses, not the hapless shop owner who is simply trying to stay in business and not get shut down by the Mask Gestapo.
I agree with the shop owner having the right to require you to wear a mask. But if they follow an illegal order by a governor, then they are supporting a criminal act. They do not have a right to do that.
Even if the governor had said NOTHING, the shop owner can require that anyone entering the store wear masks. It’s his choice, not yours.
If the governor did issue a mask mandate, and the shop owner chooses to require masks because the shop owner wants to avoid citations and the resulting civil fines and attorney fees, the shop owner can do so. (Few anti-maskers offer to donate in any serious way to help shop owners pay fines and attorney fees. Moral support only goes so far.)
Does “no shirts, no shoes, no service” ring a bell? Retards think that they have the right to say screw you to shop owners and enter without a mask. The true Constitutionalists, on the other hand, while they don’t like it, understand the situation and defer to the shop owner’s decision.
The entire situation sucks, and I am not convinced that masks help much at all. We’re all in a 2020 shit show, but it is nutso to blame a shop owner who is just trying to make a living.
You are mistaken, the government and the courts have destroyed property rights. In case you missed it, neither the government at all levels nor the courts follow the constitution. The store owners have no rights that is why they have been ordered to close in most of the blue communist states for a virus that cannot even be proven to exist. So, there is no “his house, his rules.”
Only the sheep continue to follow the government mandates. If sheep would stop living in fear and stop following the mind control mandates there would be no mandates. Your recommendation to take it up with the government is funny.
Just because they write something on a paper does not mean it is a law. The criminal acts you speak of are just criminal and they should be treated as such.
In reality they do nothing that the people do not allow. So The People can stop it at anytime.
As was said with the attack on the Death Star in the first “Star Wars,” “Stay on target! Stay on target!” Your thinking is muddled.
“…[T}he government and the courts have destroyed property rights.” That isn’t the issue.
The issue is whether a shop owner can require customers to wear masks, even if that order is illegal–and even if there is NO government order. It is his right under the Constitution, or is that not important to you?
You probably think that you have the right to go to the beach, to walk into nearby businesses, and and demand to be served, even if there is a sign that says, “No shirts, no shoes, no service.” Your view is “For Chrissakes, it’s a beach town!” and that your right to wear beach attire to shop where you please trumps the shop owner’s right to restrict entry to those who wear shoes and shirts.
“Only the sheep continue to follow the government mandates.” How is that relevant? Sheep have the right to be sheep. You and I may mock, belittle, and lampoon them, but that won’t change their behavior. It’s their nature. It’s in their DNA.
“Your recommendation to take it up with the government is funny.” In how many mask protests have you participated lately?…I didn’t think so.
The bottom line is the shop owners are caught in the middle. It all sucks. To simply rail against shop owners and sheep for not doing more is a confession that you are impotent and helpless in the matter.
The problem with all the folks here taking the side of the shop owner is pretty simple: Try refusing to bake a cake for a sexual degenerate and see what happens.
Your comment makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Let’s try some actual logic here for a change.
I’ll try to make some sense out of your non sequitur..
Because a shop owner is required by state or federal law to bake a cake for a couple of soy boys, are you saying that he is not entitled to require that people entering his store wear masks? In what alternate universe does this make sense? Tell me. I’ll wait.
You are focused on the mask issue. I am focused on the shop owner’s constitutional rights in conducting business on his property as he sees fit. How hypocritical for Constitutionalists/Patriots to demand that shop owners place their businesses in jeopardy by letting them enter without wearing masks. Shop owners are suffering financially during this pandemic so taking on the financial burden of fighting state government in a prolonged legal battle over masks is not in their interest. If they do have the assets to fight, and are willing to fight, more power to them.
How many lawsuits have you filed against the state, county, or city in order to obtain an injunction against the mask mandate? How much have you contributed to small business legal defense funds who resist the health inspectors? Not a penny is my guess.
I am not in favor of mask mandates. Studies seem to be published every week about the ineffectiveness of masks. In five years, wearing masks to stop the spread of COVID will probably be seen as pandemic quackery, much like bleeding patients was in Medieval times.
Yet, I am on the side of people being able to run their businesses as they see fit. If you disagree with that, you can hop in your car and drive somewhere where masks aren’t required by shop owners..