Germany’s ambassador to the Vatican: “Islam…is part of the solution”

Annette Schavan says: “There are warmongers who embrace religion. But that does not mean that religion promotes war. Religion has the great power to bring peace.” It doesn’t seem to occur to her that there is not a single unified entity called “religion,” or that different religions actually teach different values. She assumes that whatever is labeled “religion” teaches peace, and that anyone who commits violence in the name of “religion” must be importing his violent impulses from elsewhere, not deriving them from the teachings of “religion.”

She also says: “People are upset by the numerous attacks and wonder, ‘Should we equate these images of violence with Islam?’ One gets the impression that Islam is part of the problem. But that’s not true. It must become clear that it is part of the solution.” That is a fine assertion, but that’s all it is. Where have we ever actually seen Islam be part of the solution? Our expectations have become so low; if Islam were really a Religion of Peace that had been hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists, we could realistically expect to see a genuine mass Muslim movement against jihad terror comprising a significant segment of the Muslim population worldwide, dedicated to an honest reinterpretation of the Qur’an and Sunnah so as to mitigate their capacity to incite violence. Instead, there is an avalanche of pro-forma Muslim condemnations of terror by groups such as CAIR, which has ties to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, plus just a handful of Muslim individuals and groups who actually take a stand against jihad activity in all its forms, but have no significant following among Muslims. Many of the latter group, moreover, also deny that there is anything in the Islamic texts that needs reforming.

More…

This entry was posted in Editorial. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Average Joe
Average Joe
9 years ago
LT
LT
9 years ago

Taqiyya and Kitman.

Taqiyya and Kitman.

Both part of the Hiyal Islam – the “ingenious devices” with which they lie, obfuscate, evade, misdirect, and create/utilize loopholes in the law to obtain benefit for themselves, as well as for evading the (presumed) harm which would be caused by being honest with non-muslims, or even muslims of other sects (whose validity they deny – whom they call “false muslims”).

Do a search on al-ḥiyal wa-l-maḫārij if you want to understand how deep this chicanery runs in islam – it was already in use, less than a hundred years after Muhammad’s founding of the death-cult (all curses and shame be upon him). This Hiyal, is a fundamental part of the muslim mind, and it makes it impossible for any muslim to accept or even contemplate the existence of an objective Truth. Period. As such, it is a large part of the reason that muslims cannot be “rehabilitated”.

Their adherence to a lie of this proportion, has actually caused malformation of their minds such that they are utterly unable to contemplate, let alone respect, the rights and dignity of non-muslim people – because they are incapable of contemplating us as “people” in the first place. Their entire minds are formed around a nucleus of three precepts –

1. Jihad – that is, War and Violence for the purpose of expanding muslim religious authority – is not only good, it is MANDATORY that all muslims participate in Jihad.

2. Violent sexual impulses are a “virtue” of muslim men, and are encouraged and rewarded in a number of ways. The purpose of cultivating these violent sexual impulses, is to make of every muslim man a dangerous weapon in search of a Kafer (infidel) target to destroy.

To placate that weapon until the time comes for it to be launched against the Kafer, forceful sexual conduct by muslim men with their wives, and with children and animals as well, is permitted and even encouraged, within certain ritual bounds.

Of particular note is that fact that muslim men forcefully penetrate muslim boys, and these boys are told that, when they are grown it will be their “right” as men of allah to do the same, thus very powerfully anchoring the mentality of sexual violence in the next generation, by way of this repeated traumatic abuse at the hands of their adult male relatives.

The concept of “consent” with regard to sex is utterly absent from muslim law, culture, or society – on this assertion I challenge anyone to show, anywhere in the Koran or Hadiths where “consent” is addressed in the context of sexual activity. There is none in this context: there are only “Rights” and “Permission” – and both Rights and Permission arise from the authority of ownership, not the presence of one’s inviolable humanity – A husband owns his wife, and a father owns his children. Therefore, if a man gives permission to another man to take pleasure with what is his (his wife or child), then what is done is “lawfull”, according to Sharia (within certain ritual limits).

3. Non-muslims are not human, and have no claim to any rights or protections, whether under Sharia Law, nor any other “law”.

Because of these three core axioms of islamic society, and how deeply they inhabit all muslim thoughts and behaviors – muslims, and particularly MUSLIM MEN are incapable of living in any environment resembling Western Society, because they are ***INCAPABLE*** of comprehending, let alone obeying our laws.

To be a muslim man requires participation in Jihad. Jihad requires committing violence against any and all non-muslims, towards the objective of subjugating them. Sexual violence is a “right” of muslim men, and practicing sexual violence is a “virtue” so long as it remains within the ritual bounds taught by Muhammad – which more than permits, it specifically encourages sexual assault against any and every female Kafer (infidel), regardless of age, condition, or social status.

Now, do the mass sexual assaults across Europe make more sense?

WE HAVE BEEN WARNED