A special thanks to representatives Avila; Pittman; Jeter; Speciale; (Primary) Jordan and Szoka for HB 522. Although the title of this legislation reflects the application of foreign law, it was written primarily to protect North Carolina from creeping Sharia. So why not say Sharia instead of foreign law? Interesting question until you factor in that both the president and the head of the CIA are Muslims. This is just a way to preclude the federal government from overturning this legislation based on some technicality which would be enforced by the Department of Justice. Which is a sad commentary on the state of our country.
David DeGerolamo
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT TO PROTECT RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES GRANTED UNDER THE UNITED STATES AND NORTH CAROLINA CONSTITUTIONS IN THE APPLICATION OF FOREIGN LAW.
Related Article:
Sharia law measure getting sent to the governor
It is not aimed at Sharia law but it does protect us from it as well as any other nations laws being imposed on us without the “consent of the governed”, a Constitutional requirement. I understand Muslims want to be judged by their own laws based on the sharia interpretation of the Koran. If so then go back to whatever sharia country you came from. If you live in America, you will live by our laws, not that sick, depraved, inhuman stuff you call laws. What I don’t understand is birth-right Americans supporting this crap. Readers can follow Pam Gellar at Atlas Shrugs if you don’t know what Im talking about. http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2013/07/muslim-honor-killing-in-canada-so-many-stab-wounds-that-from-her-waist-up-there-was-no-body.html
Actually, it is aimed at Sharia law. The wording of the legislation is an effort to stop the federal government from overturning it on religious grounds.