How Important is Tartus and Latakia to Russia?

Posted on December 4, 2024 by DRenegade

From Grok:

Tartus and Latakia in Syria are significant for Russia due to both military and strategic geopolitical reasons:

  1. Tartus Naval Facility:
  2. Khmeimim Airbase (Latakia):
    • Air Operations: The Khmeimim Airbase, located near Latakia, has been a key hub for Russian air forces since the intervention in the Syrian Civil War began. It provides a platform for Russian aircraft to conduct operations over Syria, thereby supporting the Assad regime and Russia’s military objectives in the region.
    • Geopolitical Influence: The presence in both Tartus and Khmeimim signifies Russia’s intent to retain a significant role in Middle Eastern politics and security dynamics, offering a counterbalance to Western, particularly American, influence.
  3. Geopolitical Strategy:
    • Middle Eastern Influence: Russia’s military bases in Syria serve as a geopolitical leverage point, reinforcing its status as a key player in Middle Eastern affairs. It allows Russia to engage with multiple actors in the region, from Iran and Turkey to Israel.
    • NATO and Turkey: The bases provide Russia with strategic depth in its interactions with NATO member Turkey, which controls the Bosporus Strait, a critical passage for Russian naval forces moving between the Black Sea and the Mediterranean.
  4. Defense of Interests:
    • Support for Assad: These facilities are essential for Russia’s military support to the Syrian government, ensuring the survival of its ally, President Bashar al-Assad, which aligns with Russia’s broader geopolitical aims of maintaining influence in the Middle East.
  5. Economic Considerations:
    • Trade and Investment: Russia has expressed interest in expanding economic ties via these ports, with plans like setting up a grain hub at Tartus, aiming to increase trade and economic cooperation between Russia and Syria.

The strategic importance of both Tartus and Latakia for Russia cannot be understated, as they represent not just military installations but are key to Russia’s broader ambition to reassert itself as a major global power with significant influence in the Mediterranean and Middle Eastern regions. However, recent developments suggest a possible reassessment of Russian commitment to these bases, as indicated by the movement of naval assets away from Tartus, potentially reflecting concerns about the stability of the Assad regime or broader strategic recalibrations.

    
Plugin by: PHP Freelancer
This entry was posted in Editorial. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

1 Comment
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Joe Blow
Joe Blow
9 hours ago

For as long as I can remember, the Naval base at Tartus was very important to Russia. It’s their only warm-water port, the rest are all further north. I remember when they built it/built it out, there were all kinds of concerns about the Soviets projecting power into the middle east and the Mediterranean… With the capture of land on the Black Sea there may be a 2nd warm-water port, but that one is beholden to Turkey (also a Russian ally, but still, that Bosporous straight could really screw you if you built a base in Sevestapol…) I don’t see Putin giving it up, nor do I see him abandoning Assad -- Bashir has been a good foot soldier and supporter of Russia. Their ties run deep.
I could see deploying assets to sea during the conflict so they don’t accidentally get hit. Wayward GPS guided satellite bombs and such. We saw tactical withdrawl being used in Ukiestan repeatedly, they sucked the German army all the way into the Motherland and wiped them out w/ attrition -- this is just their style. They choose the time and place of confrontation.

Reply