Loud Arguments in US Supreme Court Chambers over Texas Lawsuit – COURT INTIMIDATED

h/t: Steve Quayle

Seems Plausible:

 From a source deep inside the US Supreme Court as they discussed the pending Texas lawsuit against Pennsylvania et. al. . . .

“Hal, as you know I am a clerk for one of the Justices on SCOTUS. Today was like nothing we have ever seen. The justices are arguing loudly behind closed doors.

The Justices met in a closed and sealed room, as is standard.

Usually it is very calm, however today we could hear screaming all the way down the hall.

They met in person, because they didn’t trust telephonic meeting as secure.

Chief Justice Roberts was screaming

“Are you going to be responsible for the rioting if we hear this case?”

“Don’t tell me about Bush v. Gore, we weren’t dealing with riots then”

“You are forgetting what your role here is Neil, and I don’t want to hear from the two junior justices anymore. I will tell you how you will vote.”

Justice Clarence Thomas says “This is the end of Democracy, John.”

When they left the room, Roberts, the Libs and Kavanugh had big smiles. Alito and Thomas were visibly upset. ACB and Gorsuch didn’t seem fazed at all.”

Clearly Chief Justice Roberts is intimidated by the ATNIFA/Left-wing rioting.   Well, one has to wonder if maybe he can intimidated more  by some actions of the right wing?

I’m not going to bother doing that or anything else, and neither should any of you, but I’m just wondering, is all.


Plugin by: PHP Freelancer
This entry was posted in Editorial. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Publius Huldah
Publius Huldah
10 months ago

No, I wouldn’t believe a word of it. Justice Thomas would never refer to this Country as a “democracy”. He’s too smart and informed to say such a stupid thing. I expect someone fabricated this entire story. Shame on them! Also, the Chief Justice has NO POWER to force Associate Justices to vote one way or the other. The entire story is absurd. People should spend their time learning FACTS instead of gobbling up lies.

Also, no one who works in that SCOTUS building is going to report what goes on there. Ignore any story which purports to have “inside info” on what goes on behind closed doors in that Building.

10 months ago
Reply to  Publius Huldah

Given what’s happened to a large majority of our courts, recently, are you so sure?
After Roberts labelled the ACA as a “tax”, (how does one tax something one doesn’t own), among other travesties he’s managed to adjudicate on, I find it difficult to believe that this is a fable.
First; what does the writer have to gain, or lose, by writing this?
This is not only absolutely plausable, it’s very well possible.
But that’s just in my humble opinion, of course.

10 months ago
Reply to  Publius Huldah

I agree with your statement. Hal Turner is a sensationalist hack with absolutely no credibility. Steve Quayle has proven himself to be off the same ilk, along with Dave Hodges and the “Common Sense Show”. As soon as I read the statement from the so called jurist it smelled immediately of fabrication.

10 months ago

So, as we all suspected, and rightfully so, that Roberts is a friggin’ coward and a leftist schill who thinkS he can intimidate the others to “his” way of thinking.
What happened to the others? Did they lose their spines when they were sworn in or when they entered the halls of “just-us”?
To be afraid of the riots is NO reason to adjudicate against the Constitution. In fact, it’s the very reason they should vote FOR the Constitution.
Either we have laws, enforceable laws, or we have none. It’s THAT simple.
This coward needs to be impeached -- PERIOD. Before he taints what’s left of our judicial system…if there’s anything left of it by now…
And if he thinks placating the left will save his ass, he’s absolutely insane. They’ll eat him just like the rest of us.
What he did was place every American at the hands of a maniac, another Hitler or Pol Pot.
This man is a complete disgrace!

10 months ago

Sorry, but I am with Publius Huldah above. Don’t buy it for a second. Hal Turner is not a reliable source for me. Someone made this up as click bait to generate views. Not saying he did, but someone did. Those guys working at the SCOTUS are not dumb. They would NOT Email that to anyone. There are real problems that deserve attention, like the payment processor for Hal Turner dropping him after 6 years. This is happening to a lot of non-leftist sites. Why are so many reporting the same thing happening to them? I have heard of no leftist reporting they are being dropped. Interesting times indeed.


[…] Loud Arguments in US Supreme Court Chambers over Texas Lawsuit – COURT INTIMIDATED | NC Renegades […]

10 months ago

When considering the reliability of Hal Turner’s reporting it is important to remember that Turner is documented in court records and credible investigative reporting to be a paid FBI informant and agent provocateur. There is no reason to believe that Turner is no longer an FBI asset. Given that relationship this article strikes me as disinformation intended to demoralize and enrage Americans (as if we needed any help in that regard). The article also ham-handedly suggests exploring retaliation against the Justices. That sure sounds like the FBI to me, IF Hal Turner actually had an informant who was one of a very small number of Supreme Court Clerks would Turner ‘burn” him the way that he did in this “report”? I don’t think so, Another recent Turner whopper is the “report” of 50K Red Chinese troops killed in Maine by the U.S military. According to Turner the
bombardment used to kill the PLA troops was covered up as an earthquake. Part of Turner’s usefulness appears to be as a means to discredit actual useful information like Trudeau inviting the PLA to train in Canada and the very real threat from Red China allied with our own Deep State Traitors. As always YMMV.