Merrick Garland: Not just no, but HELL NO!

The following is excerpted from Zelman Partisans:

Merrick Garland would be a steadfast, true voice that would tip the nation’s highest court in the direction of total destruction of our gun rights.

“He supported the D.C. gun ban in 2007, thereby showing he opposes self-defense and opposes the right to keep and bear arms,” Mr. Pratt said.

Garland voted… to uphold an illegal Clinton-era regulation that created an improvised gun registration requirement.

The Obama Administration was obviously a failure at implementing much of the gun control plans it was pushing, even though it consistently used every tragedy to its advantage.

So now Barack Obama is trying to preserve his statist, anti-gun legacy by nominating a Supreme Court Justice who would do it for him.

No. Just no!

    
Plugin by: PHP Freelancer
This entry was posted in Editorial. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Average Joe
Average Joe
8 years ago

As someone who recognizes, accepts, and believes in the divinity of Jesus I find it unsettling and unsatisfactory that we would consider appointing another Jewish denier of Christ to our Supreme Court. After all there is not a single Protestant on the court of this country which was founded by them.

DRenegade
Admin
8 years ago