A move significantly higher for gold toward $3,000 an ounce, as suggested by economist David Rosenberg in March, is “a possibility but seems unlikely,” says Paul Jackson, global head of asset allocation research at Invesco. That’s because the path for such an advance would mean a loss of confidence in central banks and the monetary system, and would likely rely on a dramatic further weakening of the global economy and deeper declines in real yields.
We have to be aware and vigilant concerning all information in order to formulate valid intelligence. Intelligence does drive the battlefield and other aspects of the war and the economy. As the entire world comes to understand that there will be no repercussions for bad actions, hot spots are breaking out in Libya, Syria, Israel, China, India and Iran. Any of these could escalate into a world war.
War is our future. Many argue that there is another path but they are deluding themselves. We are in 1984 and WAR IS PEACE for the powers that be. Big Brother is watching and the Ministry of Propaganda is omnipresent.
The financial markets will collapse once the economy dissolves with the second round of shutdowns. The price of gold is the best means to predict this collapse. For the first time, the price of one gold buffalo coin surpassed $2000. When people realize that the gold shell game is ending, they will try to collect their physical gold. I estimate only 1% of physical gold collection calls will cause the price of gold to hit $3000 within a few days. The value of the dollar is collapsing and people do not understand what this means when there is a limited supply of food.
And then there are the elections. How do you know something is very wrong? When the news cycle is not spinning it. It has been very quiet from both sides of the aisle concerning the elections and the federal government’s internal war.
Pray for our people and site in your rifles.
David DeGerolamo
Portland Mayor Tear Gassed By Federal Agents During Wednesday Protest
The footage of Wheeler’s tear-gassing, and his reaction, have gone viral overnight.
Strange that Communist call riots “protests” and the media plays along.
David DeGerolamo
This seems to imply that China released the Covid Virus to the World on purpose.
What’s it like to actually have covid-19?
On today’s video, Chris interviews Dr. Glenn DeSandre who is still recovering from the virus. While his case didn’t require hospitalization, Dr. DeSandre emphasizes it’s something you do not want to get. It’s not like the flu or a particularly bad cold — it’s something much worse.
What makes this interview particularly interesting is Chris ability to really dive into the medical aspects with Dr. DeSandre, who is able to describe his experience more clinically than the average coronavirus sufferer.
The most frequently asked question I get these days is what is going to happen in November, 2020. The election seems to be on the majority of people’s minds even more so that the coronavirus pandemic. In the summer of 2016 I accurately predicted that Donald Trump would enter the White House and met endless opposition to the idea. At the time, an overwhelming number of analysts in the liberty movement assumed Trump would lose, and that Clinton, by hook or by crook, would become president. Obviously this was not the case.
I made the call on a Trump presidency for a number of reasons. Set aside the fact that the majority of major elections are rigged from within because the elites choose candidates on BOTH sides to run, and lets just look at the simple campaign dynamic at the time.
For one, Clinton was the worst possible candidate that could have been chosen to run against Trump if they had actually intended on “winning”. The DNC had rigged the primary process against Bernie Sanders in order to push Clinton through, yet she was universally hated not just by conservatives but also by moderate liberals. Democrats tend to draw a larger voter base by running “vibrant” candidates that appeal to younger Americans, yet they ran one of the most twisted and decrepit creatures they had on their roster. Though all the polling said Clinton would win in a landslide, the crowds at her campaign events were tiny and devoid of energy. It was clear that she had zero momentum.
It was almost as if she was being set up to lose. But why? Trump’s rhetoric was anti-globalist and his calls to “drain the swamp” were resonating with voters. Would this not greatly damage or expose the establishment agenda?
Here’s what people need to understand…
Sometimes giving an enemy a false sense of security by allowing them a minor victory is the best strategy. The globalists strategize for the long term; not just for the next 4 years, but for the next 40 years. As Richard N. Gardner, former deputy assistant Secretary of State for International Organizations under Kennedy and Johnson, and a member of the Trilateral Commission, wrote in the April, 1974 issue of the Council on Foreign Relation’s (CFR) journal Foreign Affairs (pg. 558) in an article titled ‘The Hard Road To World Order’:
“In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion,’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”
