Soros’s Child Rapists – I Mean Refugees – Continue to Arrive In England by the busload

Express UK – ABOUT 100 more “migrant children” have arrived in Britain from the Calais camps but the Home Office has installed a massive screen outside the London processing centre so no members of the public can assess their ages.

Three coaches carrying migrants with no links to the UK arrived yesterday at the Home Office building in Croydon.

refugee-bus-arrives-london

Last week, the Home Office came under fire after welcoming adults apparently pretending to be ‘vulnerable children’ to get fast-track asylum treatment.

Now a 15ft screen has been installed outside Lunar House where the migrants are processed by officials.  The Home Office says the screen was to protect the ‘vulnerable children’.

The move, believed to have cost £2,000, comes after officials were forced to admit migrants adults had conned the system and entered the UK.

Pictures showing grown men arriving in Britain last week sparked growing public outrage.  Tory MP Philip Davies said the British public felt they were ‘being taken for a ride’ by officials.  He said: “People only have to see the pictures of the so-called child refugees to see that many of them are not children.

“A large number of my constituents have contacted me to say how angry they are that we’re being taken for fools, taken for a ride and our generosity is being abused.
~~~~~

That which causes a real and immediate danger to one’s community, one has a right to defend ones self against by means of violent force.  Period.

Imagine that – a government trying to take its citizens for a ride?

And yet here we have photos taken of “un-esorted child migrants” from the same “refugee camp” in Calais arriving in London just last week:

child-migrant-1

child-migrant-2child-migrant-4

They don’t look like children to me. Neither do they look like “refugees” at all – Fresh clothes, fresh haircuts, briefcases, electronic devices, & etc. Why, you could just about say that they look like regular people you might see walking down the street…
In Tehran, Riyadh, Abu Dhabi, or Mumbai.

 

WE HAVE BEEN WARNED

Posted in Al Qaeda, Civil Unrest, Domestic Enemies, Editorial, Immigration, Radical Islam, Safety and Preparedness | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Clinton Debate Cheating – Yet More Fraud and Lies

Posted in Domestic Enemies, Editorial, Elections, Voter issues | Tagged | 1 Comment

Hillary and China’s “Social Credit Score” System

Imagine a world where an authoritarian government monitors everything you do, amasses huge amounts of data on almost every interaction you make, and awards you a single score that measures how “trustworthy” you are.

In this world, anything from defaulting on a loan to criticizing the ruling party, from running a red light to failing to care for your parents properly, could cause you to lose points.

And in this world, your score becomes the ultimate truth of who you are — determining whether you can borrow money, get your children into the best schools or travel abroad; whether you get a room in a fancy hotel, a seat in a top restaurant — or even just get a date.

This is not the dystopian superstate of Steven Spielberg’s “Minority Report,” in which all-knowing police stop crime before it happens. But it could be China by 2020.

RTWT: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/chinas-plan-to-organize-its-whole-society-around-big-data-a-rating-for-everyone/2016/10/20/1cd0dd9c-9516-11e6-ae9d-0030ac1899cd_story.html?tid=pm_world_pop_b

~~~~~

And anyone who says that “it could never happen here” hasn’t been paying attention to the giant new datacenter which the NSA has built in the Nevada desert – the Intelligence Community Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative Data Center – which is exactly the type of facility required to engage in such “total data gathering” on a nation’s entire population.  And the ICC/NCI Data Center isn’t science fiction – it already exists and is operational.

 

Just imagine what ‘pResident Hillary’ would do,

hillary-clinton-no-teeth-big-smilewith such information at her fingertips.

 

 

WE HAVE BEEN WARNED

Posted in Editorial | 1 Comment

The Rape of Western Culture

Ten-year-old Boy Raped in Austrian Swimming Pool by Iraqi Man
who claims it was
‘a sexual emergency’

The mother of the (10 year old) boy who was raped by a 20 year old Iraqi man in a swimming pool in Austria, has said she regrets teaching her children to be welcoming to migrants,and described the man’s defense as ‘just monstrous’.

The boy’s mother Dunja, who arrived in Austria as an immigrant in the 90s from Serbia during the Civil War, said she had always taught her five children to offer the same hospitality to new arrivals that she had herself received.

Upon hearing her son’s attacker’s claim he had ‘too much sexual energy’, Dunja criticized his defense as ‘just monstrous’ and insisted he should be sent to prison and then be deported. She said she ‘regretted’ teaching her children to be welcoming to migrants.

The boy, known as Goran, had to be hospitalized with serious injuries and his mother said her son has been crying himself to sleep every night since the attack.

RTWT – http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3436988/Mother-ten-year-old-boy-raped-Austrian-swimming-pool-Iraqi-said-sexual-emergency-says-regrets-telling-children-migrants-need-help.html
~~~~~

This is so far beyond any reasonable expectation for tolerance, as to confound words themselves – It requires action.  Such monsters should all be deported to deep water, on leaky barges.  Whoever wants them, can come get them
while they last.

Any who would defend the systematic importation of this barbarous and demonic influence from the muslim world, are traitors to all Western Civilization, who should be dealt with right along with the filth with which they have infested our communities – Immediately, Directly, and Permanently.

The progressive elites like to prattle about “Zero Tolerance”; but it is We the People who should show them exactly what Zero Tolerance actually looks like.   And I do not mean going through arrests, charges, courts, prison sentences and the like.

The system has not failed – it has been turned against us.
Therefore we are obliged to abandon it, and pursue that which is Good and Right directly – by our selves and throughout our communities, by whatever means are necessary.

WE HAVE BEEN WARNED

Posted in Civil Unrest, Domestic Enemies, Editorial, Immigration, Radical Islam, War | Tagged , , , , | 5 Comments

Clinton’s Plan to ‘Duck’ The Donald

Hillary wants to ‘duck’ Donald,
Hillary wants to duck this election,
and duck the American People.

“If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck… it’s probably a duck”

 

duck-multitude

And ducks don’t tend to come one or two at a time – they generally flock you.

Only a stupid ‘ducker’ would vote for Hillary…

Posted in Editorial | Comments Off on Clinton’s Plan to ‘Duck’ The Donald

Alas, Paris

 

And to the angel of the church of Thyatira write: These things saith the Son of God, who hath his eyes like to a flame of fire, and his feet like to fine brass.

I know thy works, and thy faith, and thy charity, and thy ministry, and thy patience, and thy last works which are more than the former. But I have against thee a few things: because thou sufferest the woman Jezabel, who calleth herself a prophetess, to teach, and to seduce my servants, to commit fornication, and to eat of things sacrificed to idols. And I gave her a time that she might do penance, and she will not repent of her fornication.

Behold, I will cast her into a bed: and they that commit adultery with her shall be in very great tribulation, except they do penance from their deeds. And I will kill her children with death, and all the churches shall know that I am he that searches the minds and hearts, and I will give to every one of you according to your works.

But to you I say, And to the rest who are at Thyatira: Whosoever have not this doctrine, and who have not known the depths of Satan, as they say, I will not put upon you any other burden. Yet that, which you have; hold fast till I come.  And he that shall overcome, and keep my works unto the end, I will give him power over the nations. And he shall rule them with a rod of iron, and as the vessel of a potter they shall be broken, As I also have received of my Father: and I will give him the morning star. He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith to the churches –

You are worthy, our Lord and God,
to receive glory and honor and power,
for you created all things,
and by your will they were created
and have their being.

You are worthy to take the scroll and to open its seals,
because you were slain, and with your blood you purchased for God
persons from every tribe and language and people and nation.
You have made them to be a kingdom and priests to serve our God,
and they shall reign upon the earth.”

Worthy is the Lamb, who was slain, to receive power
and wealth and wisdom and strength
and honor and glory and praise!

To him who sits on the throne and to the Lamb
be praise and honor and glory and power, for ever and ever!

And when he had opened the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth living creature, saying: Come, and see. And behold a pale horse, and he that sat upon him, his name was Death, and hell followed him. And power was given to him over the four parts of the earth, to kill with sword, with famine, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.

 

WE HAVE BEEN WARNED

Posted in Civil Unrest, Editorial, Immigration, Radical Islam, Religion, Safety and Preparedness, War | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Alas, Paris

You Think?

all-out-of-emails

Posted in Domestic Enemies, Editorial, Elections, Voter issues | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

#PardonJulian and the #TrumpSlide

Julian Assange is a political prisoner who should be guaranteed safe passage to and refuge in America.

If Trump promises to give Julian Assange a full presidential pardon and refugee status in the United States, Trump wins in a landslide.

assange-mouthcovered-usflag

The hoaxing media has tried to ignore the corruption exposed on Wikileaks, as it implicates the media and exposes them as PR agents for the DNC. We forced the media to cover Wikileaks through the power of social media, which is why the DNC hacked Twitter today.

Trump’s promising to #PardonJulian will become news. The media will be furious. This is a news cycle.  When we don’t create news cycles, the media creates their own news cycles based on hoaxes. We must always be on the offense. Make the hoaxing media respond to us.

Source – http://www.dangerandplay.com/2016/10/21/how-to-guarantee-a-trump-landslide-pardonjulian/
~~~~~

I’m not saying that Trump will make a good president.  I’m not even saying that trump is particularly trustworthy.  I’m saying that Trump is our only chance to block Hillary from assuming the title and authority of pResident – with all the evil such a proposition carries.

Success in blocking Hillary’s campaign will not come without action.  The time for that action is now.  This is a good example of what we must all be doing, to prevent the consummation of the Clinton/Bush/Soros plan.

Failure to act, is to act.

Failure to speak out against something, is to speak acquiescence to that thing.

Failure to protect from imminent violence, is to pardon that violence.

 

WE HAVE BEEN WARNED

Posted in Editorial, Elections, Voter issues | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on #PardonJulian and the #TrumpSlide

Clinton, Revolution, Terrorism, and Lies

Posted in Civil Unrest, Domestic Enemies, Editorial, Immigration, Radical Islam, Safety and Preparedness, Voter issues, War | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Clinton, Revolution, Terrorism, and Lies

A Constitutional Question on the 9th and 10th Amendments

Image result for 9th amendment

I posed the following question on Facebook: Do you think the 9th Amendment is more important than the 10th Amendment?

9th Amendment:

“The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”

What are you thoughts?

 David DeGerolamo
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Comments
Brenda Martin
Brenda Martin I think each and everyone is very important.
Like · Reply · 2 · 11 hrs

 

Terrie Vernon
Terrie Vernon They all are important to me
Like · Reply · 2 · 11 hrs

 

Steve Baumgartner
Steve Baumgartner Not sure what your point is. 9: The people have inalienable rights, even though not specifically spelled out in the Constitution. Those rights remain inherently intact despite other rights that are spelled out.. 10: The powers not assigned to the fedSee More

Hide 40 Replies

David DeGerolamo
David DeGerolamo Which are more important: the right of the people or the rights of the states? If you need me to give you another hint, let me know.
Like · Reply · 1 · 9 hrs

 

Steve Baumgartner
Steve Baumgartner The right of the people. Your turn.

 

David DeGerolamo
David DeGerolamo So then the 9th is more important. Let’s suppose that they were equal for the sake of argument. Now throw in the Supremacy Clause.

 

Steve Baumgartner
Steve Baumgartner Fed supersedes state in the event of conflict. The point of your exercise is…?

 

David DeGerolamo
David DeGerolamo Supremacy Clause nullifies the 10th amendment. The 9th amendment is more important as one point. The second point is that people have no clue what the 9th amendment states or its importance in the future.

 

Steve Baumgartner
Steve Baumgartner If we are trying to legally justify the rights of the people superseding the power of the federal government, it is inherent in the document and establishment of the government. The Constitution was established to LIMIT the powers of the government over the people and the infringement of the inalienable rights the people possess.

 

Glen Bradley

Glen Bradley The Supremacy Clause neither nullifies the 10th nor does it claim that the fed supersedes the states in the event of conflict.

The Supremacy Clause says that any laws which follow from the Constitution are supreme.See More

 

Steve Baumgartner

Steve Baumgartner A clause in Article VI of the U.S. Constitution that declares federal laws to have jurisdictional authority over state laws in the event there is conflict between laws established by two governing bodies. http://www.businessdictionary.com/…/supremacy-clause.html

 

Glen Bradley
Glen Bradley Well then BD is wrong, because that’s simply not what Article VI says.

 

Steve Baumgartner

 

Glen Bradley

Glen Bradley The text itself:

This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

 

Glen Bradley
Glen Bradley Nothing whatever about “conflict”

 

Glen Bradley
Glen Bradley The Supremacy Clause says that the Constitution and laws that SHALL BE MADE IN PURSUANCE of the Constitution, are supreme. Full stop.

 

Steve Baumgartner
Steve Baumgartner In order to be supreme, there must be a contest or conflict to be supreme over… thus laws made by the state.

 

Glen Bradley
Glen Bradley If a law is not pursuant to the Constitution, then it is not supreme, no matter how much conflict there may be.

 

Glen Bradley
Glen Bradley If a law is pursuant to the Constitution, then it is supreme, even if there is no conflict at all.

 

Steve Baumgartner
Steve Baumgartner I follow that.
Like · Reply · 1 · 8 hrs

 

Steve Baumgartner
Steve Baumgartner Then the critical issue becomes the determination of what is specifically “pursuant to the Constitution”.
Like · Reply · 1 · 8 hrs

 

Steve Baumgartner
Steve Baumgartner Laws made by the Fed that are not designated powers by the Constitution to the Fed and usurp states rights are not supreme.
Like · Reply · 1 · 8 hrs

 

Glen Bradley
Glen Bradley Yes. Exactly. If something follows from the text of the Constitution, then it is supreme. If something does NOT follow from the text of the Constitution, then it is NOT supreme. That’s what Article VI says, and if you really examine it, the 10th Amendment is basically saying the same thing but in different language.

 

Steve Baumgartner
Steve Baumgartner So… now the critical issue is WHAT specific powers are designated to the federal government and what powers are not.
Like · Reply · 1 · 8 hrs

 

Steve Baumgartner
Steve Baumgartner This is where the Supreme Court has perverted the meaning of the Constitution and extended the reach of the federal government in legislation.
Like · Reply · 1 · 8 hrs

 

David DeGerolamo
David DeGerolamo Don’t forget executive orders and federal regulations that bypass the Constitution.
Like · Reply · 1 · 8 hrs

 

Glen Bradley

Glen Bradley The entire doctrine of the 10th Amendment can be pulled from Article VI. This is one reason why in recent years (given the abject terror those in power in the Legislature have towards the 10th Amendment) I have started saying “Article VI Pursuance” rather than “Tenth Amendment Delegation.”

It’s actually pretty easy to sort out what powers (and prohibitions!) belong to the fedgov. The vast majority of such powers are listed in Article 1 Sections 8 and 10.

There are maybe one or two powers found elsewhere, like the power to prosecute Treason, and then whatever new powers and prohibitions are found in the Amendments.

Like · Reply · 1 · 8 hrs

 

Steve Baumgartner
Steve Baumgartner David DeGerolamo Under what authority can Executive Powers and Federal Regulations be applied as pursuant to the Constitution?

 

Glen Bradley
Glen Bradley Aye, SCOTUS not only seems inept at even understanding the Constitution much less enforcing it, but the entire power of Judicial Review is not found in the Constitution in the first place, but was invented out of thin air by Justice Marshall in 1803 in Marbury v Madison.

 

Steve Baumgartner
Steve Baumgartner So the original authority of the SCOTUS is exactly what?

 

Glen Bradley
Glen Bradley Judging any disputes to which a State is party.

 

Steve Baumgartner
Steve Baumgartner States vs US?

 

Glen Bradley

Glen Bradley Yes, States vs US one of the parties is a State, therefore SCOTUS has original jurisdiction.

Re: Regulation

If a law is passed that follows properly from the Constitution, and that law establishes regulatory authority, then that thing (whatever it is) may be regulated.

But there are a few things we need to address before that idea clarifies.

First, the government we have today bears only superficial resemblance to the Constitution — three branches, the basic processes — but 90%+ of what this government does is not authorized in the Constitution. Therefore to understand what ‘regulatory powers’ may be available to the fed, you first have to discard the current ‘vision’ of government.

Second, the concept of ‘regulation’ in and of itself has changed since 1789. Back when “a well regulated militia’ was written, regulations were not minor laws and prohibitions, they were guidelines intended to “make regular” the militia. ie the rifles should be of a certain caliber so as to make it easy for fedgov to provide ammo in the event of a war

 

Steve Baumgartner
Steve Baumgartner Big difference between standardization and official government regulation on business and industry.
Like · Reply · 1 · 8 hrs

 

Glen Bradley
Glen Bradley One thing is for certain: What we’ve got is not even remotely what the Framers intended. Now I have studied this extensively for many many years, but that does not mean that I am exactly right either. But while I may not be perfectly right on all points here, the reality on the ground is not even close to right at all.
Like · Reply · 1 · 8 hrs · Edited

 

Steve Baumgartner
Steve Baumgartner LOL Understood.
Like · Reply · 1 · 8 hrs

 

Steve Baumgartner
Steve Baumgartner Because Congress (and the People) have allowed POTUS and SCOTUS to legislate without authority, we have established precedent and now we are plagued with it forever?
Like · Reply · 1 · 8 hrs

 

Glen Bradley

Glen Bradley That’s basically correct, but I like to think we can and will take it back one day. No precedent can rule forever. If I thought it was truly hopeless I’d have given up long ago lol.

What I *do* know, however, is the only way to take it back and ultimately prevail, is bottom up and not top down. We have to start with Municipal Boards, County Commissions, and State Legislatures.

POTUS and Congress will be basically useless at accomplishing these things until after we have secured the towns counties and states first.

Like · Reply · 1 · 7 hrs

 

Steve Baumgartner
Steve Baumgartner That actually sounds more achievable than top down.
Like · Reply · 1 · 7 hrs

 

Glen Bradley
Glen Bradley It has precedent. That’s how the liberals did it.
Like · Reply · 1 · 7 hrs

 

Steve Baumgartner
Steve Baumgartner And yet, when we had the advantage of the presidency and both houses of congress, the liberals still prevailed.
Like · Reply · 1 · 7 hrs

 

Glen Bradley

Glen Bradley They started in the 70’s with boards of education, moving up to municipals, counties, and states. Around the same basic timeframe when Republicans started taking over State Houses around the country, 2006-2010, is about the same time the liberals stopped focusing on locals and started focusing on the feds. The problem is their bottom-up strategy has left us with an entire majority population of progressive liberals, getting worse the younger you get.

Republicans in NC, however, when we won the Wake County Board of Education we didn’t dig in and get to work, our guys spit in everyones faces and used the board as a stepping stone to higher office. Now the voters are reluctant to give Republicans a try at the Board of Education again on account of we blew it last time.

If we were serious about making permanent lasting change, then we would go after the Boards of Education, and we wouldn’t treat the position as just a way to make a name for ourselves and run for higher office.

Honestly, it was the clown show that Reps made out of the Wake County Board of Education that led me to believe that the NC GOP powers that be weren’t really serious about making this happen.

Like · Reply · 1 · 7 hrs

 

Steve Baumgartner
Steve Baumgartner Republicans continue to be their own worst enemy. Good enough, never is with them, and they’d rather lose everything than compromise some things for a win. They would accept evil, believing it is short term, and betting on wishful long term recovery through backlash.
Like · Reply · 1 · 7 hrs

Continue reading

Posted in Editorial | 7 Comments

The Undeclared Debate – Donald v. Hillary at the Al Smith Dinner

 

 

Posted in Editorial | 10 Comments

The Appalachian Messenger – October 21, 2016

july31header
This week’s edition of the Appalachian Messenger has articles by:

Robert Gore
The Politics of Porcine Proclivities, Propensities, and Predilections

Sam Culper
Why Developing Local Intelligence Is the Best Use of Your Time Right Now

John Myers
Defeating Doomsday Derp: Tactical Tidbits for Threepers – Part 1

T.L. Davis
Lies of Omission

Click here for the October 21, 2016 edition.

Posted in Editorial | Tagged | Comments Off on The Appalachian Messenger – October 21, 2016

This Is What A Hillary Presidency Looks Like

CAUTION – Strong Language Warning.
But you need to watch it anyway.

“This is what Democracy Looks Like?”

If this is what democracy looks like, I’d rather live under a monarchy…

Posted in Domestic Enemies, Editorial, Elections, Safety and Preparedness, Voter issues | Tagged , , , , , | 5 Comments

Do You Understand Why This Is Important?

Posted in Editorial | 11 Comments

The Appalachian Messenger – October 14, 2016

july31header
This week’s edition of the Appalachian Messenger has articles by:

T.L. Davis
An American Rwanda

Robert Gore
This Long Run Won’t Be Long Enough

FlightERdoc
Grid Down Hospital

Click here for the October 14, 2016 edition.

Posted in Editorial | Tagged | Comments Off on The Appalachian Messenger – October 14, 2016