Anybody who today still repeats lies about equality, diversity, ‘not all Muslims are like that’, or tries to blame everything on the disingenuous blanket term of ‘religion’, when all the evidence around them screams towards the opposite, or tries to guilt modern-day Europeans for the violent struggle for survival of their ancestors, is as much a part of the problem as the third world horde itself.
In order to repeat these lies in the face of an absurdly contradictory reality one must either:
stand to profit from a de-cultured and disordered society
be so blind to reality as to be beyond help
or know the truth but be too cowardly to speak it.
They are either an enemy, a fool, or a coward. Dangerous at worst, and useless at best. Defining exactly which pigeonhole these immigration apologists fit into is an exhausting and dangerous waste of time. The diversity narrative is now so incongruent with reality that debating with these people is pointless. Time is far too short to waste on converting the stupid and cowardly. We will just have to run with what we have. If they can’t see the truth at this point, or are too cowardly to say it, then they are useless to us in our struggle. Europe cannot be saved by those too stupid to realise the dangers we face, or too afraid to fight her enemies.
If there is one ‘winner’ from last night’s terrible events in Paris, it is France’s anti-EU, anti-immigration far-right wing Front Nationale party leader Marine Le Pen. Having already ascended to the lead in yet another poll ahead of France’s 2017 elections, Le Pen came out swinging this morning call for France to “re-arm itself,” stating that radical Islam must be “eradicated” from France. She further demanded that border controls be made “permanent” and binational Islamists must be depreived of their French passport.
As Bloomberg notes:
*FAR RIGHT PARTY LEADER MARINE LE PEN COMMENTS IN TV SPEECH
*LE PEN SAYS FRANCE NEEDS TO CONTROL ITS BORDERS PERMANENTLY
*LE PEN CALLS FOR PERMANENT BORDER CONTROLS
*LE PEN CALLS FOR ‘ERADICATION’ OF RADICAL ISLAMISM IN FRANCE
*LE PEN: FRANCE IS ‘VULNERABLE’, ‘MUST RE-ARM ITSELF’
*LE PEN: FRENCH PEOPLE ARE NO LONGER SAFE
*LE PEN: BI-NATIONAL ISLAMISTS MUST DEPRIVED OF FRENCH PASSEPORT
It was here, here, and at the time when the Arab world was sweeping through the Middle East and coming up here, they were stopped in Paris. It was in the 1300s that the French pushed them back through Spain. So, if you think like somebody who was, you know, stuck in the 1300s, you would want these guys. This is a Rome to you. This is Rome to you. We have to start thinking like they think.
…
That’s why you have the neo-Nazis starting to rise up, because just like our governments, their governments aren’t doing anything about it. They’re not stopping any of the illegal immigration. So, what’s going to happen, I believe, is they’re going to hit Paris, and that will excite all of the people to come up here and here and up through here. It will start to squeeze Europe.
…
He looked at me, and I felt a little awkward because it was strangely specific and out of the blue, but now that I see ISIS is all but declaring Paris their number-one target, I believe this is important for you to understand. On a side note, the young kid who executed the so-called spy that ISIS caught, he’s from France, they believe. The kid couldn’t have been more than 11 or 12 years old. That’s how scary this is getting. I know people have mocked ISIS on Twitter for saying that they were going to conquer Rome, but I don’t believe they look at Rome the way you look at Rome. Maybe they do. Again, they are coming through Italy as well. Can they do it? I don’t know. Will they try? Well, bin Laden in 1999 said that he was going to bomb the skyscrapers of New York. I would suggest that we take these people at their word. You have to think like a 13th century person and the Crusades to understand their words. Remember, ISIS keeps talking about fighting the armies of Rome. Back in the Crusades days, the caliphate was dominating, and it was France that pushed the Moors out of Spain and put a stop to it.
“I don’t think they’re gaining strength,” Obama responded. “What is true is that from the start, our goal has been first to contain and we have contained them. They have not gained ground in Iraq, and in Syria they’ll come in, they’ll leave, but you don’t see this systemic march by ISIL across the terrain.”
Doctor Martin Luther King and dozens of other ordinary and devoted citizens sacrificed their lives during the civil rights movement to overcome segregation – if they could see what is happening with the black community today – they would not rest peacefully.
There was recent resignations at the University of Missouri over what we were led to believe was a horrible environment of racism at that school. One might well conclude, based on the headlines in media publications, that the school and by extension, America, was in the troughs of a racial backlash against blacks. But, if the USA Today news service is to be believed (and who wouldn’t?), there was only two racial incidents and only one verifiable at the University of Missouri:
In September some hillbillies in a pickup truck were alleged to have yelled a racial epitaph at the Student Government President who is black. Since he had previously lied about the KKK being on campus his claim is dubious at best.
In October a drunken white student uttered a racial slur towards members of a black student organization.
The first claim cannot be substantiated – but, as to white privilege, Mr. Burns’ father is quite wealthy (multi-millionaire wealthy) – so this kid would be an authority on the subject of privilege. As to the second claim; kids of all colors often say stupid things when they are cold sober, let alone when they are knee walking drunk. The drunken kid was expelled.
That’s it – two seemingly unrelated incidents in two months – neither of which is earthshaking in significance. One can go to a convenience store in most areas where there is a predominately black population and hear the same epithets being flung back and forth between blacks.
So, what would it take to build a Nazi-style society?
First, a sense that one race is responsible for all of society’s ills and deserve whatever punishment is meted out by government forces. Second, a serious propaganda effort especially a sycophantic press that encourages the violation of individual rights. Third, a corruption of “science” that enables government officials to make outlandish claims requiring government action. Fourth, a means of confiscating property through seemingly legitimate means. Fifth, police agencies divorced from the concept of public service and infused with a “superior force” mentality. Sixth, the subjugation of religion. Seventh, the de-legitimization of traditional political roles and limitations.
There is no question that each and every one of these requirements have taken place in the United States over the past several decades and that the implementation of them have accelerated in the past few years.
The image of society in Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union included the sense of being watched at all times; of being careful what one said in public for fear of being punished; of being harassed by police and questioned for political opinions; of being attacked in the night by security forces.
How, exactly is the feeling any different in the United States in the past few years? Maybe the East German Stasi is not the inquisitor, but the IRS has made a suitable substitution.
