NC Renegades

The Obama Administration tells us that they have a “robust” vetting system for Syrian refugees. The problem with that is that the Obama Administration said that the average person would save $2,500 by the implementation of Obamacare; it said that the Stimulus program would restart the economy; it said that ISIS was a Junior Varsity (JV) type terrorist organization; it said that ISIS was “contained.” So, excuse me if I am wary of its statements on a “robust” vetting system. But, if so, why not tell us what that is? Run it down for us and please be specific.

The real question I have is why the Obama Administration seems intent on bringing Syrian refugees, many of whom are jihadists, into the United States while at the same time is deporting Christian refugees from Iraq and the clutches of ISIS? Are these not the same refugees fleeing the same dangers, the difference being only whether they are Christians or Muslims? And, if he is a Christian, as he claims, why does he always defer to Muslims in any instance of choice?

I am not going to pretend to know anything about Barack Obama. I have not researched his lineage, or his religion, or his childhood. It has long been moot. I recognized that we wanted a black president for all sorts of reasons. Obviously the black population wanted someone like them in office. Okay, I want someone like me in office, too, only I don’t consider just being white as being like me. There are lots of white people and black people I don’t want in the office of the President of the United States and there are very few who I do want in that office.

More…

The blast triggered what looks like a sizable fire and the cause is under investigation. Allow us to speculate: either some factory owners with Party connections were able to skirt safety restrictions again possibly leading to the catastrophic loss of life and the release of untold pollutants into the air and water or else someone had some excess inventory they needed to vaporize.

More…

View additional comments on Tea Party Nation.

Everything that is impacting our lives can be simplified into one question that we must address:

Why is the government destroying the country?

I want to address five points to make this case:

1. Culture

Our country’s strength has always been diversity that is united in a common set of beliefs and principles. A Divided States of America would never have achieved the success of the Great Experiment. But that is well known. In order to destroy the country, it must be divided. As our rulers are dividing our culture. Black against white. Poor against rich. Democrat against Republican. Muslim against Christian. An unending list promulgated daily to ensure our division and the destruction of our unified culture. Would anyone care to defend the administration’s two-tiered justice system? Would anyone care to defend the government’s support of Black Lives Matter?

2. Economy

Our economy and stock markets are manipulated by the Federal Reserve and the financial industry. Anyone playing devil’s advocate would dismiss this statement based on the value of the New York Stock Exchange. The reality is a collapsed economy buoyed by government stimulus, entitlements, workfare and manipulated reports. We only have to look at the Baltic Dry Index, trucking figures and retail sales to see the truth. The government cannot manipulate the unemployment rate by reducing the workforce for much longer. The cost of healthcare has gutted the finances of the working class. Would anyone care to defend the illegal imposition of a health care tax that has increased premiums over 40%?

3. Military

Our military leadership has been gutted by the current administration. There are several explanations for this policy:

a. The administration is afraid of a military coup.

b. The administration is purposely exposing the country to foreign attacks.

c. The administration is setting up a shadow government to stage its own coup.

Would anyone care to defend the administration’s current immigration plan to import young Muslim males and settle them throughout the country? Would anyone care to defend the administration’s current open border policy?

4. Religion

This country was founded on Judeo/Christian principles. The government has taken the Christian religion from every aspect of our lives. The pResident even vilifies Christians as bitter clingers. A planned Muslim invasion of our country is now exposed. I can only surmise their plan is to instigate civil unrest to impose martial law. Would any care to defend the current administration’s viewpoint on religion?

5. Morality

The republic is meant for a moral people. If we are not moral, the republic will fall. Consider the government’s positions on:

a. homosexuality

b. same sex marriage

c. underage sex education with parental permission

d. abortion

No moral nation would butcher their babies and sell the parts. There has been some outcry from our rulers, but the bottom line is the government is still funding Planned Parenthood.

The facts are plain: the government is not the country. The government is not representing the people. The states have ceded power to the Federal government. If the people are the country and the government is its creation, then the solution is clear. Only the courage and honor is your heart is setting the time frame for the inevitable.

David DeGerolamo

President Obama today condemned those who have called for denying Syrian refugees entry to the United States because of the deadly attacks in Paris Friday.

“That’s shameful. That’s not American. That’s not who we are,” Obama said to reporters at the G-20 Summit in Antalya, Turkey.

Obama, in particular, also targeted remarks from some Republicans in the wake of the attacks who have suggested screening refugees seeking entry into the United States to make sure they are Christians and not Muslims.

More…

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Then again, does anyone care what this pResident feels?

David DeGerolamo

CNN’s Jim Acosta asked President Obama Monday, “Why can’t we take out these bastards?” During a press conference at the G-20 Summit in Antalya, Turkey, Obama replied, “When we send troops in, those troops get injured, they get killed, they’re away from their families. Our country spends hundreds of billions of dollars. And so given the fact that there are enormous sacrifices involved in any military action, it’s best that we don’t, you know, shoot first and aim later. It’s important for us to get the strategy right and the strategy that we are pursuing is the right one.” See the exchange: Jim Acosta: I wanted to go back to something you said to Margaret earlier when you said you have not underestimated ISIS’s abilities. This is an organization that you once described as a ‘JV Team,’ that evolved into a force that has now occupied territory in Iraq and Syria and is now able to use that safe haven to launch attacks in other parts of the world. How is that not underestimating their capabilities? And how is that contained, quite frankly? And I think a lot of Americans have this frustration that they see that the United States has the greatest military in the world, it has the backing of nearly every other country in the world when it comes to taking on ISIS. I guess the question is, and if you’ll forgive the language, is why can’t we take out these bastards? Barack Obama: President Obama: Well Jim, I just spent the last three questions answering that very question, so I don’t know what more you want me to add. I think I’ve described very specifically what our strategy is. And I’ve described very specifically why we do not pursue some of the other strategies that have been suggested. This is not, as I said, a traditional military opponent. We can retake territory. And as long as we leave our troops there, we can hold it, but that does not solve the underlying problem of eliminating the dynamics that are producing these kinds of violent extremist groups. And so we are going to continue to pursue the strategy that has the best chance of working even though it does not offer the satisfaction, I guess, of a neat headline or an immediate resolution. And part of the reason, as I said, Jim, is because there are costs to the other side. I just want to remind people. This is not an abstraction. When we send troops in, those troops get injured, they get killed, they’re away from their families. Our country spends hundreds of billions of dollars. And so given the fact that there are enormous sacrifices involved in any military action, it’s best that we don’t, you know, shoot first and aim later. It’s important for us to get the strategy right and the strategy that we are pursuing is the right one.President Obama took questions at the g20 summit in turkey. jim acosta asks president obama “why can’t we take out these bastards” referring to isis. watch president obama answer the question in the video above. After noting that Obama once called the terrorist group the “jayvee team” and claimed to have them “contained,” CNN’s Jim Acosta asked bluntly, “Why can’t we take out these bastards?” “

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The lies of a Muslim traitor.

David DeGerolamo

Ar15 Trigger – Image AimSurplus.com

I’ve made my own personal list of my five favorite AR-15 triggers. But remember, this is my list, and based around the type of shooting I prefer to do. Your list might be totally different for all sorts of good reasons. And there are lots of probably great triggers out there that I just don’t have any experience with, and thus cannot say anything about, like the very popular AR Gold Modular Triggers. They get great reviews, and shooters seem to love them – I’ve just never had a chance to try one out in person.

So here are my personal Top 5 favorite AR-15 triggers, with a few reasons as to why I rank them in this particular order.

5. Original Mil-Spec Factory Trigger.

Even though lots of AR shooters can’t wait to drop in a new trigger, there’s a lot to be said for the plain-Jane, factory original. Yes, sometimes you get a creepy or gritty one, especially if you go with a manufacturer that’s not known for mil-spec parts. It works well enough, and there’s very little that can go wrong, as the design has been proven many times over. There’s not much chance it will be so light that you fire it before you intend to due to excitement or stress or adrenaline in a serious situation.

Plus, it’s non-adjustable, and many shooters fall prey to the siren call of the adjustable trigger and adjust themselves into unnecessary problems. There’s always the chance that a perfectly-adjusted trigger somehow slips out of adjustment, exactly when you need it most. Currently, I have three guns with factory original triggers and plans for some more of the same in the future.

More…

Words cannot adequately describe the utter horror that was unleashed on the streets of Paris, France on Friday. CNN is calling it “the worst violence witnessed in France since World War II“, and even though it happened a couple of days ago now, many of us are still having a really tough time processing what took place.  Somehow, a small group of less than 10 radical Islamists was able to unleash a coordinated wave of attacks that killed at least 129 people and injured at least 350.  All of this comes less than a year after the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris, and many in the western world are now starting to understand that something has fundamentally changed.  Even though France has a highly advanced anti-terrorism infrastructure, and even though it also has some of the strictest anti-gun laws in Europe, none of that did anything to prevent these attacks.  Despite all of our advanced technology, the openness of our society makes us highly vulnerable to Islamic terror.  And as more waves of refugees from the Middle East are absorbed by both Europe and the United States, it is inevitable that there will be more attacks like this.

According to Google, the definition of a “soft target” is “a person or thing that is relatively unprotected or vulnerable, especially to military or terrorist attack.”  And as we just saw in France, the western world is literally teeming with soft targets.  I am talking about sporting events, concert halls, schools, churches, shopping malls, power stations, water treatment facilities, mass transit, etc.

For those that wish to create terror, the opportunities are endless.

In the western world, we generally rely on certain deterrents in order to maintain order.  Most sane people do not want to be shot, and most sane people do not want to go to prison.

But what do you do when there are large numbers of crazy people that are actually looking forward to being martyrs?

More…

Security forces are preparing for a Paris-style terrorist attack in the UK as counter-terror sources reveal up 450 radicalised Britons have returned from Syria, while Scotland Yard investigates 600 terror cases.

Special forces have been deployed onto Britain’s streets to monitor major stations, shopping districts and other public places amid fears the UK could be the next target.

Charles Farr, director of the Office for Security and Counter-Terrorism, told the Sunday Telegraph that Islamic State was inspiring followers who “couldn’t go” to Syria to stay at home and “undertake attacks”.

He added that “about 750 [British citizens] of interest to the security and intelligence services” had travelled to Iraq and Syria, and that “about 60 per cent have returned.”

More…

Two days after the horrendous jihadist attacks in Paris, Pope Francis preached about the “end times,” encouraging his hearers to be vigilant and ready at any moment to meet God face to face.

In his Angelus message Sunday, the Pope invited the ten thousand pilgrims gathered in Saint Peter’s Square to think about their death, the day they will meet God and give an accounting for their life.

The Pope also explicitly addressed the Paris carnage, expressing his “deep sorrow for the terrorist attacks that bloodied France late on Friday, causing many casualties.” Along with offering his condolences to the victims and their families, Francis condemned the massacre as an “unspeakable affront to human dignity.”

More…

More…

I wonder what these world “rulers” will come up with at their summit. The United States, Russia and China meeting at the center of the Ottoman Empire? Dreams of the new caliphate? How to profit and increase power in World War III?

How many people knew that the pResident was out of the country or that this summit was occurring? I have no doubt that Russia and China will put the pResident in his proper station.

David DeGerolamo