Wrong Again

I would have bet money ($1) that the government would shut down instead of passing yet another continuing resolution. I do not mind being wrong as He keeps me humble.

Who knows, this may be the catalyst to remove another traitor from a top position as McCarthy’s back door deal with the Democrats was the last straw for even Marjorie Taylor Greene.

UPDATE:

McCarthy Says He Doesn’t Want to Part of Republican Team After Passing Continuing Resolution

David DeGerolamo

Posted in Editorial | 5 Comments

The Restoration of Public Virtue

Posted in Editorial | 2 Comments

We Are Paying for Our Own Death

Posted in Editorial | 7 Comments

Transgenic Edible Plants

Posted in Editorial | 8 Comments

The Analogy Is Obvious

Posted in Editorial | 1 Comment

Two-Punch

    So, here at week’s end we see these two rather momentous issues juxtaposed: the battle over how to finance that blob-infested monster in DC; and the battle to expose the crimes of a real-life Manchurian Candidate president. Neither battle is going all that well for the minority of citizens who want to live in a pro-reality society. If we follow the fiscal trend, all the tax revenue we can grudge up will barely cover the annual interest on our $30+trillion debt. If we can’t boot out the brain-dead cat’s paw in the White House, then say goodbye to the rule of law and liberty with it.

     The people we elect to Congress don’t want to be accountable for specifically authorizing spending on the blob’s multitudinous pet projects. So, they depend on multi-thousand-page omnibus bills nobody can ever scrutinize, and continuing resolution dodges to postpone any necessarily painful action on a budget. Therefore, a dissenting coterie in the House proposes to play hard-ball over de-funding the blob, that is, a government shutdown of unknown duration, until gaslight is replaced by sunlight. The blob itself sends out a frantic S.O.S. Don’t let these white supremacist, “far-right” MAGA nut-jobs drag us out of the comfortable warm, moist darkness we thrive in — perfect conditions for continued blob growth!

More…

Posted in Editorial | 3 Comments

Area Intelligence 101: Why You Need an Area Study

Head over to https://areaintelligence.com and get access to a lot more Area Study content.

Posted in Editorial | 5 Comments

May I Have Some More, Please?

Source

One picture can convey many points. The above image shows the collapse of Germany (NATO) and the climate change looting scandal. It also shows the inferiority of NATO weapons being supplied (dumped) to Ukraine. Extra points for the NAZI symbol on the tank.

David DeGerolamo

Posted in Editorial | 2 Comments

Fool for the Elites

Imagine being an extremist for wanting to make your country great again. Patriots endure personal deprivations to serve and defend the Republic against traitors who want to promote a democracy that destroys the country. Joe Biden is just a figurehead for treason but he is still a traitor. However, he is correct that Americans have to figure out where we stand.

David DeGerolamo

Posted in Editorial | 14 Comments

Popcorn

Posted in Editorial | 2 Comments

Two Wolves and a Sheep

Posted in Editorial | 6 Comments

Boots on the Ground …Sept. 28th…News you need to know and it is not looking good.

Posted in Editorial | 9 Comments

Gun Violence, and the sophistry of poor grammar

I’ve yet to find a dictionary where the word ‘gun’ is an adverb, to my knowledge it’s always been a noun. Yet find a court of record that won’t accept the phrase, out of willful ignorance. One form of weapons confiscation is the ‘Violence Against Women, Act’, put forth by then Senator Biden. How often have we heard ‘Men are Violent’? Yet we never hear about ‘Women are Malicious’. So often the bureaucrats use ‘defense of women’ as a preface for defense of themselves.

Let’s start with Violence, the use of, or a threat to use, overwhelming force. Civilized society condemns acts of violence, unless of course it’s the state using the force. It happens everyday by agents of the state, EVERY DAY. Whether it’s a sociopath cop on the beat, a judge sitting on a raised bench, a BAR member defending a liar, a town clerk enFORCEing policy, legislatrix or a bureaucrat writing BATF felony rules, it’s all an overwhelming use of force for their convenience. Apparently every Sheriff in office believes they work for the BAR, as bailiffs. ‘Shut up or I’ll hold you in contempt’, and the brown shirt will do what he’s told, as following orders are nothing more than a favor card to be played later, against the people. YET VIOLENCE IS NOT A LEGAL STANDARD FOR CONVICTION. But you know what is….?

MALICE, is the legal standard for which a person must be convicted of a crime. And who are the most malicious in society, the effeminate. Why would this be true, you might ask. Because women, and beta males (many of whom are BAR members), are not capable of violence without resorting to a higher power/authority (ie government). So they use character assassination as a primary means of getting the judiciary to use it’s legalized monopoly on violence as their weapon (tool or implement of war) of choice. And the ‘white knights’ will rush to their aid, to gain the merits they so richly deserve <sar>, a sense of accomplishment as addictive as crack cocaine. They want to be seen as the moral authority of society, above the common grunt they are arresting from causing harm to their community. Blowing smoke up their own asses in the name of suppressing violence, all the while ignoring that women (and beta males) have been repeatedly proven to be twice as malicious. It doesn’t get more sanctimonious. And god forbid they have to suffer repercussions for their unlawful actions of aiding and abetting a breach of their fiduciary duty. So they take the time to make sure it’s all done legal like, and create ‘check the box and fill in the blank’ affidavit forms (so the plaintiff can be well informed of all their legal options). Technically this is a form of Leading the Witness, and a way to turn the screws a little harder (take your children, house, pets, ANY property that can be considered militant in nature). ALL to make you subjugated to the plaintiff/courts/BAR/police, and everyone of them love to remind you of the fact they’re your superior, because you ‘have the potential to be violent’. And it all starts with the quintessential standard of the witch trial, ExParte court of record proceedings. A female can take the stand wearing as much make-up as she wants, even if it’s a fake black eye (Pandora’s Pithos). What will the black robe wearing bench sitter say if she’s later proven to have committed perjury? “We are required to take them at their word on their testimony.” And even if they attempt to convict the plaintiff after the fact, it’s a Misdemeanor. (This is one reason so many fat, ugly, foreign women claim Julio beat them, yet he can’t be found. Instant green card, and plenty of victim benies. ‘Soros’ makes sure they know how to play the game)

This is only the beginning, and only applies to those in a physical relationship or a family member (which can be even worse, as they will dig up your childhood AND THE COURTS WILL GO ALONG). Think your ex-wife is off the table, think again, I knew two men who had nothing to do with their exes for decades. One was a former officer who got a heads up, had his son grab his guns. Turned in his old service revolver. The other’s ex was senile, and the court accepted the explanation (in their 70’s). Had to move her into a convalescent home shortly after(she had ‘social workers’ as motivation). While the state statute says all property is to be returned, the state BAR has been kind enough to create a ‘fill in the blank’ motion to return your weapons. Too bad it doesn’t include the return of high value metals, as that’s against their bureaucratic policy. And if you have any high value exotics, a deputy will have made sure they’re on the black market, confident the ‘incumbent’ won’t report stolen firearms (they make sure to get at least one magazine). File a motion for the return of all your property, that’s OK, they don’t have to accept (you can pay $200 for the appeal, a few hundred more having the transcript typed up, but in the end you will eventually realize it’s cheaper to upgrade than to continue wasting time and money on the BAR). This all assumes you didn’t capitulate to doubling your chances of solving all your problems at once.

What does the future hold? Well it is a civil court proceeding, so there is title transfer of you house, financial compensation, extended or even permanent restraining orders on the table. You name it, if they can’t get it in a criminal court, where they have to abide by due process supply an attorney and acknowledge your natural right against self incrimination, they will create an extortion policy to keep you subjugated in civil proceedings. You are a male, it’s your duty to provide for women (and the government/BAR). The BAR is a commerce syndicate of professional sophist, they are well aware of how to make a little innuendo go a long way. Have doubts Deut 19:15 will stand in their way, it hasn’t so far.

In conclusion, to all the complacent POS out there who allow this misandry to continue, here is some Fredrick Niechzte. ‘We often hear “Gentlemen prefer blonds”, yet we never hear “but they marry brunettes.” In the same vain we hear “Love your enemy”, yet we never hear “Hate your friends.” ie lull your enemies to ignorance, chastise your friends’ indifference. Hope you get the firsthand experience, you’ll never forget it.

Posted in Editorial | 5 Comments

And For Their Next Act…

Posted in Editorial | 9 Comments

For Your Consideration

I do not like prepper groups. I have valid reasons for this which have evolved over the past 15 years. I do like mutual assistance groups and building community. That is why I bought land and built the community center where the Lord directed my path.

I will convey one story along this path. It is only one of many but I hope to make a point about good men making bad decisions under pressure.

I was part of a small group for a few years which was preparing for the apocalypse. The time frame was over ten years ago. While I was part of the leadership of the group, I was not the “figurehead leader”. Our leadership consisted of 4-5 people while the group ranged from 10-16 people over that time frame.

I arrived for a leadership meeting to find the leader in an argument with the man responsible for the tactical portion of the group. He was developing SOPs for situations in the future so that there would be no discussion on how to act. Here is the synopsis for the scenario under discussion:

The world has collapsed and our group has an established perimeter with LP/OPs in place. A couple and their young child come walking down the road into our “perimeter”. Since food and security are paramount concerns, the course of action was to kill the family.

The leader had a problem with the course of action. As the discussion became more heated, I left the room to talk to the leader’s wife as I thought the discussion and scenario were not worth my time. The discussion escalated quickly so I returned to find the man responsible for tactical standing over the seated leader screaming that he had to kill the family.

I want to pause for a second to let this sink in. This is a true story and I want to reaffirm that this was over 10 years ago. I was laughing inside myself that the tactician had lost control of his emotions over this very flawed scenario. What I did not expect was the leader to back down and accept his solution of killing an innocent family. Needless to say, the group did not last much longer. While this is only one story, I want to remind everyone that good men will do bad things when their families are starving. Or their leaders are flawed, weak and have little or no faith.

Was the leader a good man? I thought so prior to this but my opinion changed as more character flaws surfaced. Whatever my opinion of the leader, the tactician was clearly not a “good” man. This became more evident when he presented his thoughts on supply runs: any of our adult children who disobeyed him while on a “mission” would be executed.

Revenge, vengeance, righteousness, honor, justice, morality and rationalization should be our concerns today for a better tomorrow. How you act or react will have consequences that you may not be able to escape. Malachi has several stories to share concerning groups if he so chooses. If anyone else wants to share, here is a venue for you.

My point is simple: 15 years of waiting gives a Christian man time to contemplate what the Lord’s path and actions for him will be. We all will be tested. Some will fail and some will rise to temper their souls.

David DeGerolamo

Posted in Editorial | 20 Comments