Download from original source
THE ELITE HAVE ALREADY FLOWN OFF TO THEIR HIDEOUTS, THEY HAVE RELEASED THE GENOCIDE
READ IT AND WEEP, WE ARE EFFED. PFIZER’S OWN DOCUMENTS STATE BOTH INHALATION AND SKIN CONTACT WILL TRANSMIT WHATEVER IS IN THE VAX FROM THE VACCINATED TO THE UNVACCINATED AND THAT THE RESULTS ARE DEVASTATING
Here is what just this small portion of this Pfizer document is saying:
1. If a man who was not vaccinated touches a vaccinated woman, or breathes any of the air she breathes, (in other words, walks by her in the office) and he then has sex with his wife, his wife can have an adverse event and she should avoid having children.2. If a woman who was never vaccinated gets exposed to a woman who was vaccinated, she can:
A: miscarry,
B: spontaneously abort,
C. poison a baby via her breast milk
D: Have babies that have congitive difficulties.
This is universal, and very bad. Here is a small section of text I translated to English:
8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure
“An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant.
When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer saftey within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened, regardless of whether or not there is an associated secondary adverse event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event report form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE STUDY.”
TO CLARIFY: Vaccine study participants become super spreaders of something, they don’t say what it is, but it triggers secondary adverse events in people that never had the vax, when they are exposed to people who did have the vax.
THIS IS SO BAD that right here, in this little bit of quoted text, it warns that un-vaccinated men who have been exposed to a woman who was vaxxed will then pass whatever is in the vax to another woman.
Even the relatively small portion of the document I have put below here says the vax triggers spontaneous abortions and reproductive problems when un-vaccinated people are exposed to the vaccinated and that breast milk from a vaccinated mom can harm the infant. And if anyone does not believe it, then click the link above and wade through that enormous and intentionally confusing document. It’s for real folks, the vax is indeed the kill shot.
Do not permit the vaccinated to come anywhere near you, it is now official.
Here is a small portion of this huge document, straight from pfizer:Terms:
Study intervention – A vaccine test subject.
AE – Adverse event in someone who got the vax.
SAE: An adverse event in someone who was exposed to someone who got the vax.
EDP: Exposure during pregnancy8.3.5. Exposure During Pregnancy or Breastfeeding, and Occupational Exposure Exposure to the study intervention under study during pregnancy or breastfeeding and occupational exposure are reportable to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness.
8.3.5.1. Exposure During Pregnancy An EDP occurs if:
* A female participant is found to be pregnant while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.
* A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
* A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy:
* A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.
* A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
____
What about the people that got the Moderna and Astra0-Zenica shot ?
From what I understand, the components of that “vaccine” are different?
and yes, we’re fooked.
Stop looking for options. The ENTIRE thing is the kill shot. That’s the ENTIRE intention of all of it and it’s coming out of our jewish “friends”.
It’s been their OPENLY stated goal for decades.
Lock & load, solidify the fortitude to use them and quit asking stupid questions.
that’s not why i’m asking. I won’t take the jab.
I’m asking because this is multipronged fourth generation warfare. Those taking the shot have become the bioweapon.
and I’m suspecting that it’s a sterilization tool First and foremost. Yes, a lot of people are going to die from the jab. But satanists love to cause as much misery as possible.
JEWS JEWS JEWS (and their sellouts). Stop the satanist crap. This is not being implemented by a guy in a funny halloween costume who likes hot places.
Yes, it’s clearly coming out now it’s also a sterilization weapon … which of course ties into depopulation. And no argument (((they))) get off on as much misery as possible. Full historical record proving this.
ALL this vaccine insanity no matter the company is to kill us off. Keep it simple for the sheeple. Don’t involve yourself in splitting hairs on this.
We’re in a kill or be killed situation literally. No use over complicating it.
So true. Its kill or be killed. And the wicked are trying hard to kill. So maybe the righteous should as well!!
Is there a time period for which these people are toxic to others? Or does it wear off after 6 months?
So, I have actually read the linked document. AE means Adverse Effect and SAE means Serious Adverse Effect. Also, the documents Says nothing about transmitting anything to anybody. You need to take this down as it is fake news
Section 8.3
Only question is whether ALL studies of this kind warn of/collect data on these kinds of events.
thanks, saves me the time, already assumed through intuition and red flags, the contributor having knowledge only they have access to, takes me back to how the election was stolen.
Before I buy into this panic no getting I need to see UNBIASED research showing HOW this transfer occurs AND what mechanism is used to cause these “deadly” effects. I am not a big fan of vaccination for Covid because I don’t believe the benefits outweight the MINISCULE risks the virus poses to most people. And I am certain that nowhere near enough unbiasedfesearh and testing has been done on the existing vaccines. But the notion that a vaccinated person can cause harm to a third party they never cross paths with is a VERY hard claim to believe. I have a degree from a university that has NO degrees tht are not part of the medical field and 4 decades of experience. I tell people that unless they are real old or really unhealthy the vaccines is a bigger risk than benefit. But this claim is almost impossible for keto believe.
The report has page numbers.
ON WHAT PAGE NUMBER DOES IT SAY THIS?:
“1. If a man who was not vaccinated touches a vaccinated woman, or breathes any of the air she breathes, (in other words, walks by her in the office) and he then has sex with his wife, his wife can have an adverse event and she should avoid having children.2. If a woman who was never vaccinated gets exposed to a woman who was vaccinated, she can:”
I only read the portion about occupation exposures — which apparently means a nurse or other person accidentally pricking themselves with the needle — and it says nothing like this.
You present something as being within the report, but don’t cite the page that it’s on and tell people to read the whole (“confusing”) report.
And when we’ve read the whole thing and don’t find what your reporting, then what?
I haven’t read the whole thing. It would be helpful if the portions were specified which say that adverse reactions can occur from inhalation exposures near vaccinated subjects.
Section 8.3
Utter horse crap. The report DOES NOT say what this jackass (and, by extension,YOU) says.
Here is the portion referenced (that said jackass puts in quotes even though he has changed what is written):
The “study intervention” is the “vaccine”. “Unplanned direct contact” is accidental injection.
Take this garbage down, it’s embarassing.
8.3.5.2. Exposure During Breastfeeding An exposure during breastfeeding occurs if: • A female participant is found to be breastfeeding while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention. • A female is found to be breastfeeding while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention (ie, environmental exposure). An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.
Are you suggesting that the vaccine can be inhaled?
It’s just another one of those Conspiracy Loon websites, likely just one of those Clowns In Action Disinfo sites meant to waste your time.
I read through the pertinent section, 8.3.5, and for what it’s worth my understanding is the document is simply setting up procedures to record possible adverse effects that may occur during pregnancy/conception. In other words, it’s not telling us that the following adverse effects WILL ALWAYS OCCUR. It’s just saying if they DO occur during pregnancy/conception, do the following (i.e., record/document the event to Pfizer).
Is anyone else coming to the same conclusion or am I just being too naive?
It discusses exposure “to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact”. The question is what that actually refers to. I think it refers to a vaccine vial breaking and spilling onto the person’s skin, or the person inhaling the contents. It isn’t clear either way. Someone needs to do some journalistic work and contact the study authors for a statement defining what exposure to the study intervention does and does not include.
Woah woah woah, you’ve gone and literally altered the quote from section 8.3.5.3 from “direct contact with the study intervention” to “direct contact with the vaccine test subject”! Talk about dishonest!
The paper doesn’t define “study intervention” as “vaccine test subject”. From what I can tell it doesn’t give a proper definition at all, but from context “study intervention” sounds like a dose of the vaccine.
eg page 10 “In participants receiving at least 1 dose of study intervention…”. Same thing on page 11, 12 etc.
“Participants receiving at least 1 dose of [vaccine test subject]” doesn’t make any sense given the context.