The Narrative Continues

“…I don’t know, still think the transtifa biz is false flag…..There was a speaker engaging Charlie about the LGBTWTF at the moment, part of the operation, perfect timeing. There was at least one other attendeee in the crowd who was cuffed and his pants dropped to hobble him for something he did or said for effect….”
I agree there was a conspiracy and a coordinated hit, I don’t see any reason yet to conclude that there were pro’s present though. If you recall, there was a large scale orchestrated hit on a prominent right wing guy in Portland OR back in 2020. They looked like just a bunch of Antifa walking down the street. but they were using scouts in a car and clear signals to different task groups to line up the mark and shoot him dead. The gunman was identified because he was stupid and wore a distinctive clown outfit in front of cameras all day. It was obvious even in the dark that it was him. He was chased down and killed by the cops, and there was absolute zero interest in finding the rest of the crew or even admitting there was a large group of murderers involved.
In a similar manner, the antifa in the Kyle Rittenhouse event picked him out early as a target on that day because he looked like a goofy kid and an easy mark. They executed a complex ambush on him in just a few hours after they sent in antifa dressed as “Press” to scout him out and pretend to interview him. The gang came back later with the clear intent to separate him from his buddies, disarm and then shoot him. There were signalers and a captain firing a pistol in the air to initiate the ambush. It would have worked great if Rittenhouse had been the Twinkie they thought he was. Putting signalers, scouts, decoys, getaway drivers, a diversion, and a clean up man in crowd for a scheduled speaking event is not that complicated when you have legions of delusional nuts at your disposal who think they are fighting Nazis.
“…Plus, stuffing a Mauser in a backpack takes a minute or 2 to separate the stock from the action to fit. Put it back together again? Come on, it was a plant….”
I think there is a lot more to be suspicious of in respect to the infiltration, the weapon itself, and the escape. That little schoolbook bag of a backpack he had on did not look like it was big enough to accommodate that rifle even if it was broken down in 2 pieces, and there is no comment on whether he did that or not. The rear view of the backpack does not even suggest that something oversized and rigid was forced into it to my eye. The weapon does not look like it breaks down easily without tools, but I’m no expert on sporterized Mausers. The scope certainly looks like it is mounted far too rearward and would have gashed his brow. definitely suspicious. I also do not buy the story that he is carrying a rifle when he jumped off the roof. The video is not great of that and though he looks like he is fumbling with something, it looks too short and floppy to be a rifle to me, towel or not. We need a lot more information about this rifle. Who owns it, bought it, loaned it, etc.
The FBI also did not cover itself in glory here, but at least they did not hose down the roof 15 mins after the shooting this time. Still, the suspect clearly has a large cell phone in his pocket, I guess the enemy does not know anything about metadata despite being a tech savy modernist boy. He even seems to have implicated a buddy trying to arrange disposal of the weapon. How long exactly does it take the FBI to geolocate a cell phone to a specific crime scene like that anyway? They were at the Butler shooter’s house within minutes. Seems like they should have had him in a few hours based upon the phone alone.