I wrote an article yesterday to the Deep State operatives outlining a series of questions for them to consider. I did this for two reasons:
- I wanted them to understand that their motives for treason are based on personal reasons. Their acts and participation in the coup may be based in a quest for power, money and/or fame. They may also be based in fear: fear of retribution for breaking the truth or fear of justice if this coup collapses. Their motives are not based on a better future for the country or their children. They have no sense of Judgment in the afterlife. They have no honor or public virtue. They only have attributes that history shows are doomed to failed.
- I wanted to expose the trolls and their flawed logic that present false propositions to weaken our resolve.
Here is the first example:
although I certainly agree with the sentiment, the writer of this article is at least half clueless to the real history.
(((they))) engineered the French Revolution to their benefit.
the founding principals are a complete fraud perpetrated by (((them))). The founding fathers and the constitution was a complete scam from word one.
I can pick apart every point as to how he’s clueless to the history of the (((real perps))).
We don’t have a hope in hell of winning unless you face who the REAL enemy are.
Note how the first sentence attacks me for being “clueless to the real history”. I have seen this too many times for 13 years: I am right and you are wrong, clueless, stupid or another label to marginalize the person or argument without any facts. Since he is right, he continues to attack the founding principles, Constitution and the founding fathers. Although he can pick apart every point as to how I am clueless, no facts are presented. His closing sentence warns us that we have no hope to win unless we know who the real enemy is. As usual, the real enemy is not named so we must have no hope of winning.
My first point is that this comment is no different than pulling out the race card to win the “argument”. There are no facts presented to support his claims, no positive steps forward and no hope of success. According to him. We cannot organize and move forward without first being able to recognize those who want their own glory because they know better. This is the Strongman argument outlined in the The Road to Serfdom:
When other readers questions his comment, he doubles down:
absolutely not sitting this one out. But I sure as hell know EXACTLY who the enemy are.
Do you ? Do you really ? I’d be willing to bet 95% on here do not.
And if you don’t get that point ….
Matt Bracken….. another fool who doesn’t know who the (((real enemy))) are.
Not only does he not know, you point it out and he attacks you for it.
How the hell do you win a war without knowing exactly who to go after ?
Which only confirms my original assessment. As for the comments stating that we must find a leader, I addressed this in another post.
I do not care if we have a leader, have no hope of winning at this time or the consequences of standing up. I have no choice but to follow in His path for me and only have a desire to hear “arise good and faithful servant” on Judgment Day. It is time to focus on the truth and not be distracted by traitors and wishful strongmen.