I asked Grok two questions concerning Rubio’s nomination and then pointed out the error in his assessment.
I apologize for the oversight. Let me clarify the situation:
- My first response incorrectly stated that Rubio had been nominated for Secretary of State, based on the understanding from earlier reports or speculation.
- My second response correctly noted that while there were reports about Rubio’s potential nomination, no official announcement from Trump had been made up to that point.
The conflict arises because the first response was based on outdated or premature information. The correct stance is that there have been discussions and expectations around Rubio potentially being nominated for Secretary of State, but no official announcement from Trump had confirmed this at the time of my last response. Thank you for pointing out the inconsistency, and I’ll ensure to provide updates based on the latest confirmed information.
Plugin by: PHP Freelancer
Bad choice if it’s true. His Chief of staff came from Dick Cheney. He is friends with Niki Haley. Who the hell pushed him up front. He is a warmonger chicken hawk.
He is also anti-2A. That says it all to me.
Whew! I thought it was a done deal.
There is another theory floating around. Pull him out of the Senate by giving him a big job with Trump, have Ron de Santis replace his ass on the senate with a solid MAGA person, then Trump fires him from the big job.