Yes, it was deliberate https://t.co/CcQc2MKGNO pic.twitter.com/wkPAyZZLQz
— Lord Bebo (@MyLordBebo) January 31, 2025
CADD Graphics
Carolina Readiness Supply
Websites
NC Renegade on Twitter
NC Renegade on Gab
NC Renegade on Truth Social
Wes Rhinier on Gab
12 Round Blog
Barnhardt
Cold Fury
DanMorgan76
Defensive Training Group
The Deth Guild
The Feral Irishman
First in Freedom Daily
Forloveofgodandcountry's Blog
Free North Carolina
Knuckledraggin My Life Away
Liberty's Torch
90 Miles From Tyranny
Professor Preponomics
Publius-Huldah's Blog
Straight Line Logic
The Tactical Hermit
War on Guns
Western Rifle Shooters Association
Categories
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- strider777 on Can Anyone Explain It to Me?
- DRenegade on Tillis
- kal kal on China Leaked SARS-COV2 Virus
- kal kal on China Leaked SARS-COV2 Virus
- kal kal on China Leaked SARS-COV2 Virus
Archives
Meta
Trans pilot Jo Ellis rumored to be Black Hawk pilot in fatal collision over Potomac River Yea, President Trump knows.
The new religious suicide attacker? If true, that means two men were flying the help, not a man and a woman.
There is a video circulating of the transgender woman in question, which appears to look like her, alive and telling the world she is alive, and it was not her flying the helicopter. No names on the list of passengers are raising any red flags, thus far. Something nefarious is up here and I’m not so sure Trump knows either. I’m assuming deep state actors are still deeply imbedded in our government and this could be a cover for something more sinister happening. Maybe that is what Trump knows and hasn’t figured out how to deal with that, yet? I’ve read other “theories” that it is was a woman flying, of a higher rank (LT?) and black. All the more reason to confirm Patel and Gabbard, NOW. It is going to take years to clear out the corruption in the federal government, if that will even be possible, short of a massive rebellion.
From this new angle of the crash, it looks INTENTIONAL.
Thank you.
If a transgender knew he would be unable to keep flying because of the new rules in the military, he might choose to go out in a blaze of glory. It might be a consideration.
That’s the first explanation I’ve heard that makes sense.
It is curious that the two other flight crew members were named, but not the “woman.” It would be unlikely for the other pilot to go along with suicide and murder unless they were deleted prior to the incident, which would not be hard to do as it would be unexpected by the victims. A sad situation all around.
There are already denials that the tranny was on board. We have to wait and see. If the tranny wasn’t the pilot, then the question is, who set everyone up? Who had the name of the tranny? Who knew where the tranny worked? Someone on the inside.
Perhaps trans was not an issue. But if you listen to the audio, you only hear male voices, no female voices. If a woman pilot was being evaluated, you would think she would be flying and talking on the radio. I was fighter pilot not helo pilot, but usually when you are flying you are talking on the radios as well to avoid confusion.
Are pilots armed during training missions? Wild speculation here, but I wonder if we find out the other two crewmembers died of lead poisoning before the crash. This would make it impossible for the copilot to grab the cyclic and avert the crash at the last moment.
My very first thought when I saw the crash video from the other day was that it was deliberate. Someone said the city lights can confuse pilots, but wasn’t the Blackhawk headed AWAY from the city? Is there any possibility that the Blackhawk pilot didn’t see the BLINDING landing light(s) on the aircraft? You can see those lights from 50 miles away OR MORE.
It’s odd that we’re not hearing ANYTHING yet about the “female” pilot.
President Trump needs to get out in front of this RIGHT NOW.
I looked at the latest video with clearer resolution. There is no way that the pilot was wearing night vision at that point in the flight. The landing lights would have blinded them. If the pilot was wearing night vision for a period of time prior to this and then removed the monocular, they would be blind in that eye for a period of time depending on how long they were wearing it. I too thought about whether the other crew had been shot or incapacitated. Occam’s razor: a helicopter is well above its flight ceiling, not responding to the control tower and makes a beeline for 24 seconds to hit a jet.
hmm … and the vermont bp shot by the trans vegans from the bay area.
so terminal liberalism might soon be proven to be quite the fatal disease.
twa 800 occurred when slick willie was cic. the feds seized the investigation then. it will be a tell if the NTSB is pushed out again.
guess i’ll keep my tin foil hat nearby after all : )
I fear it’s not any more complicated than that. Occam’s razor indeed.
David,
We don’t wear monocular NVD’s, Army Aviators and crew members are equipped with dual ANVIS 6 NVG’s while our Air Force counterparts wear ANVIS 9. Huge difference between ANVIS and the standard PVS14 issued to Infantry.
Good to know. So no blindness from wearing night vision?
No, any NVD can have washout.
Thank you.
Carpenter, question for you…….does the pilot at the controls do the talking on the radio, especially for things like acknowledging a visual on an airliner?
It depends upon the crew pre-mission brief. Standard SOP, the pilot on the controls primary responsibility is to fly the aircraft while the pilot/co-pilot not on the controls at that time makes the radio calls and changes the required frequencies. Functions change throughout the mission as to who is on the controls.
The question you ask is actually two part answer. Given the mission set of PAT 25 (H-60 call sign) and 12th AVN BDE no individual or crew served weapons would be issued and authorized as this unit is not designated as a combat unit; ie, the 101 ABN, 82nd ABN would be. Different mission sets call for different combat configuration kits. Only during live-fire and actual combat or other classified missions would the aircrew be equipped weapons “hot”. Hope this helps
When I first seen the video, I already knew it was a deliberate attack on that regional jet approach from one of joe Bidens DEI pilots who wanted to kill innocent people. I believe it was a message to Trump and Hegseth from the military DEI general or generals who were most likely behind it. Trump will find out who is behind it and the heads begin to roll in the military. the rats in the military at the pentagon begin finger pointing because a crime such as this is treason and whoever is involved must stand in front of a firing squad.
Another likely scenario, of many circulating. As I stated above, another reason to get Patel and Gabbard confirmed, NOW.
I think someone needs to take a real hard look at that passengers list
Agree completely. My very first thought.
Sometimes it’s just human error. Complacency. Sometimes it’s not. Wait for the facts.
Wow! Deliberate for sure! Next question to ask is who was on the AA flight that someone needed killed? The collateral damage was of no importance. (This happens far too often than we think.) See TWA 800