Two GUN TRUTHS to DESTROY the Gun Control Debate

This entry was posted in Editorial. Bookmark the permalink.
5 1 vote
Article Rating
15 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
NC Rob
NC Rob
4 years ago

Again, she says we will never give up our rights. Haven’t we already done that? WE ARE NOT FREE.

1791
The Bill of Rights, including the Second Amendment, gains final ratification.

The Second Amendment reads:
“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

1837
Georgia passes a law banning handguns. The law is ruled unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court and is thrown out.

1865
In a reaction to emancipation, several southern states adopt “Black codes” which, among other things, forbid Black persons from possessing firearms.

1927
The U.S. Congress passes a law banning the mailing of concealable weapons.

1934
The National Firearms Act of 1934, regulating the manufacture, sale, and possession of fully automatic firearms like sub-machine guns is approved by Congress.

1938
The Federal Firearms Act of 1938 places the first limitations on selling ordinary firearms. Persons selling guns are required to obtain a Federal Firearms License, at an annual cost of $1, and to maintain records of the name and address of persons to whom firearms are sold. Gun sales to persons convicted of violent felonies were prohibited.

1968
The Gun Control Act of 1968 is enacted for the purpose of “keeping firearms out of the hands of those not legally entitled to possess them because of age, criminal background, or incompetence.”

The act regulates imported guns, expands the gun-dealer licensing and record-keeping requirements, and places specific limitations on the sale of handguns. The list of persons banned from buying guns is expanded to include persons convicted of any non-business related felony, persons found to be mentally incompetent, and users of illegal drugs.

1972
The federal Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) is created, listing as part of its mission the control of illegal use and sale of firearms and the enforcement of Federal firearms laws. The ATF issues firearms licenses and conducts firearms licensee qualification and compliance inspections.

1986
The Armed Career Criminal Act increases penalties for possession of firearms by persons not qualified to own them under the Gun Control Act of 1986.

The Firearms Owners Protection Act (Public Law 99-308) relaxes some restrictions on gun and ammunition sales and establishes mandatory penalties for use of firearms during the commission of a crime.

The Law Enforcement Officers Protection Act (Public Law 99-408) bans possession of “cop killer” bullets capable of penetrating bulletproof clothing.

1988
President Ronald Reagan signs the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988, making it illegal to manufacture, import, sell, ship, deliver, possess, transfer, or receive any firearm that is not detectable by walk-through metal detectors. The law prohibited guns from not containing enough metal to trigger security screening machines found in airports, courthouses and other secure areas accessible to the public.

1989
California bans the possession of semiautomatic assault weapons following the massacre of five children on a Stockton, Calif., school playground.

1990
The Crime Control Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-647) bans the manufacturing and importing semiautomatic assault weapons in the United States. “Gun-free school zones” are established, carrying specific penalties for violations.

1994
The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act imposes a five-day waiting period on the purchase of a handgun and requires that local law enforcement agencies conduct background checks on purchasers of handguns.

The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 prohibits the sale, manufacture, importation, or possession of several specific types of assault-type weapons for a 10-year period. However, the law expires on September 13, 2004, after Congress fails to reauthorize it.

1997
The U.S. Supreme Court, in the case of Printz v. United States, declares the background check requirement of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act unconstitutional.

The Florida Supreme Court upholds a jury’s $11.5 million verdict against Kmart for selling a gun to an intoxicated man who used the gun to shoot his estranged girlfriend.

Major American gun manufacturers voluntarily agree to include child safety trigger devices on all new handguns.

June 1998
A Justice Department report indicates the blocking of some 69,000 handgun sales during 1997 when the Brady Bill pre-sale background checks were required.

July 1998
An amendment requiring a trigger lock mechanism to be included with every handgun sold in the United States is defeated in the Senate.

But the Senate approves an amendment requiring gun dealers to have trigger locks available for sale and creating federal grants for gun safety and education programs.

October 1998
New Orleans becomes the first U.S. city to file suit against gunmakers, firearms trade associations, and gun dealers. The city’s suit seeks recovery of costs attributed to gun-related violence.

Nov. 30, 1998
Permanent provisions of the Brady Act go into effect. Gun dealers are now required to initiate a pre-sale criminal background check of all gun buyers through the newly created National Instant Criminal Background Check (NICS) computer system.

May 20, 1999
By a 51-50 vote, with the tie-breaker vote cast by Vice President Al Gore, the U.S. Senate passes a bill requiring trigger locks on all newly manufactured handguns and extending waiting period and background check requirements to sales of firearms at gun shows.

Sept. 13, 2004
After lengthy and heated debate, Congress allows the 10-year-old Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 banning the sale of 19 types of military-style assault weapons to expire.

December 2004
Congress fails to continue funding for President George W. Bush’s 2001 gun control program, Project Safe Neighborhoods.

October 2005
President Bush signs the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act limiting the ability of victims of crimes in which guns were used to sue firearms manufacturers and dealers. The law includes an amendment requiring all new guns to come with trigger locks.

January 2008
In a move supported by both opponents and advocates of gun control laws, President Bush signs the National Instant Criminal Background Check Improvement Act requiring gun-buyer background checks to screen for legally declared mentally ill individuals, who are ineligible to buy firearms.

June 26, 2008
In its landmark decision in the case of District of Columbia v. Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment affirmed the rights of individuals to own firearms. The ruling also overturns a 32-year-old ban on the sale or possession of handguns in the District of Columbia.

February 2010
A federal law signed by President Barack Obama took effect allowing licensed gun owners to bring firearms into national parks and wildlife refuges as long as they are allowed by state law.

Dec. 9, 2013
The Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988, requiring that all guns must contain enough metal to be detectable by security screening machines was extended through 2035.

July 29, 2015
In an effort to close the so-called “gun show loophole” allowing gun sales conducted without Brady Act background checks, U.S. Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.) introduces the Fix Gun Checks Act of 2015 (H.R. 3411), to require background checks for all gun sales, including sales made over the internet and at gun shows.

June 12, 2016
President Obama again calls on Congress to enact or renew a law prohibiting the sale and possession of assault-style weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines after a man identified as Omar Mateen kills 49 people in an Orlando, Fla., gay nightclub on June 12, using an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle. In a call to 9-1-1 he made during the attack, Mateen told police he had pledged his allegiance to the radical Islamic terrorist group ISIS.

September 2017
A bill titled “Sportsmen Heritage and Recreational Enhancement Act,” or SHARE Act (H.R. 2406) advances to the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives. While the main purpose of the bill is to expand access to public land for, hunting, fishing, and recreational shooting, a provision added by Rep. Jeff Duncan (R-S.C.) called The Hearing Protection Act would reduce the current federal restrictions on purchasing firearm silencers, or suppressors.

Currently, the restrictions on silencer purchases are similar to those for machine guns, including extensive background checks, waiting periods, and transfer taxes. Duncan’s provision would eliminate those restrictions.

Backers of Duncan’s provision argue that it would help recreational hunters and shooters protect themselves from hearing loss. Opponents say it would make it harder for police and civilians to locate the source of gunfire, potentially resulting in more casualties.

Oct. 4, 2017
Less than a week after the Las Vegas shooting, U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) introduces the “Automatic Gunfire Prevention Act” that would ban the sale and possession of bump stocks and other devices that allow a semiautomatic weapon to fire like a fully-automatic weapon.

Oct. 5, 2017
Sen. Feinstein introduces the Background Check Completion Act. Feinstein says the bill would close a loophole in the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act.

Feb. 21, 2018
Just days after the February 14, 2018, mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, President Donald Trump orders the Justice Department and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms to review “bump fire stocks”—devices that allow a semi-automatic rifle to be fired similarly to a fully-automatic weapon.

July 31, 2018
U.S. District Judge Robert Lasnik in Seattle issued a temporary restraining blocking the release of blueprints that could be used to produce untraceable and undetectable 3D-printable plastic guns.

August 2019
In the wake of three mass shootings in Gilroy, Calif.; El Paso, Texas; and Dayton, Ohio in the span of two weeks that left a total of almost three dozen people dead, a new push was made in Congress for gun control measures. Among the proposals were stronger background checks and limits on high-capacity magazines. “Red flag” laws also were proposed to allow police or family members to file a court petition to remove firearms from individuals who might pose a danger to themselves or others.

August 9, 2019
President Donald Trump indicated he would support new legislation requiring “common-sense” background checks for gun purchases. “On background checks, we have tremendous support for really common-sense, sensible, important background checks,” Trump told reporters at the White House. Noting that he had spoken to National Rifle Association CEO Wayne LaPierre, the president said the issue “isn’t a question of NRA, Republican or Democrat. We will see where the NRA will be, but we need meaningful background checks.”

The House of Representatives had previously passed the Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2019, which would ban most person-to-person firearm transfers without a background check, including firearm transfers at gun shows and between individuals. The bill passed 240-190, with eight Republicans joining almost all Democrats in voting for the bill. As of September 1, 2019, the Senate had taken no action on the bill.

August 12, 2019
President Trump voiced his support for red flag gun confiscation laws. “We must make sure that those judged to pose a grave risk to public safety do not have access to firearms and that if they do, those firearms can be taken through rapid due process,” he said in televised remarks from the White House. “That is why I have called for red flag laws, also known as extreme risk protection orders.”

August 20, 2019
After speaking with NRA Chief Executive Wayne LaPierre, President Trump seemed to back away from supporting expanded background checks for firearm purchases. “We have very strong background checks right now,” he said, speaking from the Oval Office. “And I have to tell you that it is a mental problem. And I’ve said it a hundred times it’s not the gun that pulls the trigger, it’s the people.” Trump also stressed his support for the Second Amendment, stating that he would not want to go down the “slippery slope” of infringing on the right to bear arms.

January 20, 2020
Rep. Hank Johnson, a Georgia Democrat who sits on the House Judiciary Committee, on Jan. 30 introduced H.R. 5717, which would, among other items, ban the purchasing and possession of assault weapons. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., introduced in February the Senate version of the bill, S.3254.

Last edited 4 years ago by NC Rob
1776
4 years ago

Rob,
What everyone, including yourself have forgotten (probably because you were never told), is that our rights do not accrue from any of the three Constitutions.
Do we celebrate “Independence Day” or not? We do, and not “Constitutions Day.”
Our founding document is The Unanimous Declaration of Independence. Nothing else. Constitutions? We can take ’em or leave ’em, our rights and guarantees would remain.
Our country began on July 4th, 1776, as an unincorporated Union of soil jurisdiction counties and states. On September 9th, 1776, our unincorporated Federation of unincorporated Land jurisdiction (international) States was formed.
This was our government, with all the rights and guarantees accruing to Americans (-Not- “U.S. Citizens,” which was a status for the Tories that stayed behind after the Revolutionary war to continue providing us with services.) What? You thought that all those British subjects left? Many of them chose to head north to Canada, or return home, but most elected to stay, and remain loyal to the Crown.
After our victory on Land (but our defeat at Sea), we had won a playing piece in the big game (after all, the “Revolutionary War” was just a backwater theater in the World War that had just been fought).
George Washington, who had been instructed by his cousin King George III (or rather his handlers, since syphilis had rendered him similar to Biden…completely demented) to start the Revolutionary war as a means of voiding the treaties with the Native American Nations, had a change of heart, and realized that this was a chance to build an independent franchise.
So, after the Paris Peace Treaty in 1783, the Articles of Confederation were ratified as a place holder, while more suitable power-sharing agreements could be drafted, dividing up the responsibilities (delegations of power) among the three interested parties: the Americans, the British Crown, and the Roman Pontiff (-not- the Pope, which is his “religious capacity.”) The Office of Roman Pontiff pre-dates Christianity by some 700 years, and as the arbiter of worldwide commerce, he had a stake in how this upstart Country was run.
Hence, the three Constitutions (one for each branch of government, which are not, as gullible schoolchildren are taught, “Executive, Judicial and Legislative,” which are -types of functions-, but Federal (Republic), Territorial, and Municipal) were each ratified:
1787 The Constitution for the united States of America. Federal Republic subcontractor, this was our American subcontractor, DBA as “The States of America.” State of State business entities styled as “The State of Maine, The State of Vermont….” etc. Also known as the Confederation. Jurisdiction was International (after all, each state is a separate Nation, making up the totality known as a Country).
1789 The Constitution of the United States of America. British Territorial subcontractor. Later formed its own unauthorized State of State business organizations styled as “State of Maine, State of Vermont…” etc. Note the lack of capitalization on the definite article, meaning these were not the singular, original Federal States. Jurisdiction International, High Seas and Inland Waterways, as well as any Territories that had not yet been admitted as states of the Union. Was responsible for running and staffing the “U.S Navy” (and still is- yes, “our” Navy is a franchise of the British Navy).
1790 The Constitution of the United States. Roman Municipal. Authorized by The Residence Act of 1790 to have Plenary Power over a square ten miles on a side (100 square miles), forming an Independent, International City State outside the American Public Law (the events of January 6th beginning to make sense?). Air jurisdiction, DC was formed to provide a peaceful meeting place overseen by the Roman Pontiff for the subcontractors to meet. It is its own “Capitol”, since the American capitol was (and always has been) Philadelphia. Of late has become nothing but a foreign Pirate Base, outside the Law.
So, this is the basic history and structure of the “U.S. government” (not the American government).
Things ran fine (with a hiccup in 1812 when the Americans had the audacity to introduce the 13th Amendment forbidding anybody holding foreign Titles of Nobility from holding office in our Federal Republic). The British marched in, burned everything that might hold a copy, and marched out. Fortunately multiple copies of this updated version of The Constitution for the united States of America survived, showing that the TONA Amendment was in fact ratified in 1819. Since the British and Roman subcontractors desired of putting those holding Titles of Nobility (such as “Esquire”) in public offices of their Territorial and Municipal branches, it was not included in either The Constitution of the United States of America or The Constitution of the United States.
During the entire time our subcontractor government was functioning, from 1790 to 1860, there were no infringements on Arms for Americans (that is, people born on one of the States, and not working as a Federal, Territorial, or Municipal government services worker). When the unlawful mercenary conflict known as the “Civil War” erupted in 1861, the Federal subcontractor was rendered non-functional, and even though Americans were not involved in this war (though many fought for both “civil” corporate belligerents), they still experienced the loss of their “stake.”
After the ceasefire (not any kind of “Peace Treaty”), the victorious Territorial (Northern Confederate States) imposed harsh reparations on the defeated Municipal (Southern Confederate States). In 1868, in perhaps the biggest theft and fraud in the last 2000 years, a Scottish Commercial Corporation was formed, calling itself “The United States of America (incorporated).” Americans were not told the implications of this, and the rest of the world presumed this Incorporated Entity was good old TUSA they had dealt with for the past 92 years.
This Incorporated Entity used a corporate charter called “the Constitution of the United States,” and drew up bylaws called the “13th and 14th Amendments” (which, if anyone was paying attention, would have realized was fraud, since the TONA was already in force as the 13th Amendment- to The Constitution for the united States of America). The 13th Amendment “freed” the black plantation slaves (in the sense that they were “cut loose” from any ownership claims), and the 14th Amendment enslaved them (and anyone else claiming to be a “citizen of the United States”). The 14th Amendment said that “slavery was illegal…unless you were a criminal.” And since “citizens of the United States” were in fact, war criminals, well…you get the picture.
Gradually, over the next 70 years, more and more people were fooled into claiming to be “citizens of the United States.” All the immigrants coming into America were made “citizens of the United States,” and thus chattel slaves. It is why unfettered immigration is such a huge business: the more slaves, the better.
In 1933, King Rat himself, FDR, “pledged” (donated) all of the Municipal chattel slaves as collateral, backing his new Federal Religion (“holy cause”). He also sent out agents to collect all gold holdings of these Federal “persons” (non-living entities), but “forgot” to mention it only applied to Municipal “citizens of the United States.” He also started passing “Acts,” again, that only applied to Municipal and Territorial employees (A “Code” is a private law that only applies if you work for that employee, in this case either the Territorial or Municipal branches).
Since both types of “U.S. Citizen” were considered either indentured servants or property of the government, they had no claims of any of the “Bill of Rights,” since (as explicitly elucidated in all three versions of the BoR) they only accrued to “The People,” -not- “persons” (dead or incorporated “things.”) The Territorial and Municipal government services corporations can demand their employees and property behave any way they deem necessary, to include forbidding or limiting their access to Arms.
So to sum it up: our rights never went anywhere.
Are in fact, still there and fully intact, laying upon the ground like gold nuggets trod on my the ignorant. But, since ignorance of history has become endemic, people have claimed a third class status known as “U.S. Citizen,” or a fourth class status known as “citizen of the United States.” As -Americans,- we have all of our rights and guarantees, are owed every jot of all three Constitutions by our erring employees, and not subject to any infringement, taxation, or interference whatsoever.
But in order to claim them, it is necessary to Declare and publicly Record our Status. Think of it as “secession, on a one at a time basis.” No violence needed. No “second Declaration of Independence” needed (the original still works just fine). If you allow yourself to be presumed as any kind of foreign “U.S. Citizen/citizen,” you will be sat down pretty quickly.
Might want to do that pretty soon? Time is growing short, and we need all hands on shovels to help dig ourselves out of this mess.
theamericanstatesassembly.net

DRenegade
Admin
4 years ago
Reply to  1776

There is no evidence that George Washington had syphilis.

1776
4 years ago
Reply to  DRenegade

Correct, George Washington did not have syphilis. I did not imply he ever did.

However, his cousin, King George III (as I indicated), absolutely had syphilis. Not to mention the various genetic, shall we say, “difficulties” that accrued from the rather unsavory marriage habits of the Houses of Hannover and Guelph.

He was pretty much a figurehead from 1775 onward, with the actual administration of the British Empire being handled by Westminster. Syphilis is a “hell of a disease.”

George Washington was used as a Cat’s Paw to instigate a Revolution (using the very strong and justified discontent that had been growing over the past 25 years in the Colonies). This “change of management” would then nullify the Treaties entered into between The Crown and The Native American Confederation, allowing for expansion beyond the Treaty Boundaries of The Ohio River Valley.

However, Washington had a change of heart, and realized that he could carve out an actual Independent Country (in spite of his complete lack of military competence).

With the intervention by the French at the last minute, victory was secured on Land (even though victory on the Sea eluded the Continental Navy).

The French were the victors in this war (it was after all, the first true “World War”), as evidenced by the venue of the Peace Treaty (Paris), and they negotiated a triparte power sharing arrangement with the Americans, British Crown, and Roman Empire (in the personage of the Roman Pontiff). The French were punished for their intervention with the destruction and genocide of the vast majority of the Noble Houses that supported our bid for freedom (in the worlds first quasi communist “revolution”).

The American Government (in the form of the unincorporated Federation that had been running the actual Country since September 9th, 1776), delegated 19 specific authorities to these three subcontractors (each of whom had a very specific “sandbox” they had authority over). Federal Republic- the actual Land of the States. British Territorial- Territories not yet states, High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways, running and staffing the “U.S. Navy.” Roman Municipal- Administering the “District” that had been ceded to them by Virginia and Maryland (defined as a square ten miles on a side by the 1790 Residence Act).

Those delegated powers did not simply disappear, and as authorities that are delegated must be possessed by the delegator, we as Americans still possess them, and are choosing to exercise them in the presence of our subcontractors ongoing criminality.

The subcontractors were required to stay in their lanes, and no presumption that one subcontractor could transgress onto the turf of another. It is still this way, but since most people allowed themselves to be flagged as “U.S. Vessels” or “Roman Galley Slaves,” the private decrees of these out of control subcontractors can be applied to them anywhere in the world they may go (including upon our 50 nation-states, which are considered “foreign, non-domestic” with regard to the Territorial and Municipal subcontractors.

We are currently in-session, and intend to send delegates to Philadelphia within two years to convene a Continental Congress to decide if our erring subcontractors should get a renewal of their service contracts, or be given pink slips. There’s nothing that says we need subcontractors, since we are perfectly capable of mowing our own lawns and seeing to our own governance, as we did for 11 years between 1776 and 1787.

Americans are encouraged to join in the Reconstruction, but U.S. Citizens/citizens of the United States are not able to participate. So which one are you?

DRenegade
Admin
4 years ago
Reply to  1776

I suggest that you read “The Real George Washington” and “George Washington’s Secret Six: The Spy Ring That Saved the American Revolution”.

1776
4 years ago
Reply to  DRenegade

I have read it.

But message received. The information has been freely given. I won’t trouble you again.

But as I have said: we truly do want every American home safe on the Land and soil. The sea is an unforgiving and voracious mistress.

Thank you for your time, effort, and risk to life, honor, and fortune.

Lorna
4 years ago
Reply to  DRenegade

No, but Abraham Lincoln did. Read about it about thirty
yrs. ago. He died before the latter stages of syphilis.

Cindy
Cindy
4 years ago

If it’s not the guns it will be the food. Why are we still having these arguments? We constantly complain that they are doing this and that to us but yet, we sit on our asses and complain and don’t go out and fight for it we can’t just sit here and expect “THEM” to honor anything let alone the constitution……………..THEY DO NOT CARE…GET IT

1776
4 years ago
Reply to  Cindy

Cindy,
They don’t care because unless you have corrected your status, you are their employee or property.
None of the three Constitutions (or rather, the Bills of Rights contained therein) are for the benefit of the governmental services corporations or their employees (“U.S. Citizens or citizens of the United States”). They stipulate what the governmental services corporations may -not- do, (negative law), and do not provide any guarantees to any but the principles (Americans, functioning as “The People,” not “persons”).
Correct your status and join your State Assembly, the issues are being dealt with, food and supply chain issues included. We need more people to lend a hand, it is a huge undertaking (the actual American government has been “missing, presumed lost” for the last 160 years). We are the only ones that can do it, since we are the possessors of the delegated authorities being “exercised for us” by our erstwhile employees.
No violence needed, no futile attempts by “State of State” (federal franchise business organizations) entities to “secede” (an impossibility, since a Burger King franchise cannot “secede” from Burger King).

Our original Government, the one that mowed its own lawn and saw to all the other business of running the Country for almost 11 years without hiring subcontractors, is still here. And, since our erstwhile subcontractors committed massive fraud, theft, graft, murder, kidnapping, and dozens of other high crimes, not to mention going bankrupt, all those delegated authorities? They have reverted to us.
This is recognized as Lawful, above-board, and not some kooky conspiracy theory. Our subcontractors have admitted as much. We The People have returned.
So. It’s simple: are you an American? Or a “U.S. Citizen?” Choose, and either stay on the sinking ship, or come ashore and help finish the Reconstruction.
theamericanstatesassembly.net

a follower
a follower
4 years ago
Reply to  1776

Anna von Reitz,
we are all ‘victims’ and they owe you
Saved by doing your paperwork, etc. etc. etc. More false answers, more false hope, more nonsense. Whit hats, good witches, “new human” also seems to coexist and converge with the q movement.
All my opinion ( if that makes you feel better) but ultimate Truth as My Master and Savior leads me in common sense and in discernment through this world.

Last edited 4 years ago by a follower
1776
4 years ago
Reply to  a follower

A follower,
I find it funny that you denigrate something that is demonstrably and provably correct and effective.

The evidence has been presented, and it is not theoretical.

There’s an old saying: “One who is honestly mistaken and hears the truth, either stops being mistaken, or stops being honest.”

Which one are you? And, let’s ask another question: who do you follow?

“Jesus Christ?”

Well, a little problem there. There was nobody named “Jesus Christ.”

“Christ” simply means “The Annointed.”

The historical figure we mistakenly refer to as “Jesus” was instead known as “Yeshua,” or “Joshua.” So everyone praying to “Jesus Christ” is mis-addressing their prayers.

But to get back to the thrust of your arguement: yes, we have all been victimized. Why is that so difficult to see? Killed in wars for profit, killed by the pharmaceutical companies, milked for “taxes” we never owed.

Yes, we own pretty much everything on the planet. We have the receipts. Why is that a problem?

We just received all the Labor Bonds back from the Pontiff, and will be issuing an updated currency no later than November. Banks and investors are clambering to our doorstep to try to hypothecate medium-term bonds based on these returned assets (which are based on the labor of -all- Americans).

But instead of doing so (and continuing the cycle of bondage and servitude), they are being allowed to mature, cashed out, and used to invest in America. Federal Reserve Note serial numbers (which are Blood money based on your sweat and blood) will be destroyed when they are exchanged for American Currency Credits.

But, ultimately, it comes down to this: we are the power-holders, and if only 12K of us have properly corrected our status, then it is those 12K that will be making the decisions and getting things done. Your opinions are yours to have and hold, but they have exactly zero effect or force on what is being done. Sorry to put it so bluntly, but them’s the facts.

If we had malicious intent, you’d better believe we would be keeping this information to ourselves. But we aren’t. You, and all the unlawfully Shanghai’d Americans are welcome (and encouraged) to come home. But nobody would dream of forcing you (after all, that’s what the Brits and Romans did to you as a baby).

So, either keep doing what you are doing, and reaping the benefits of your apathy, or lend a hand.

We will continue to enjoy being Americans, and having our birthright gurantees.

a follower
a follower
4 years ago
Reply to  1776

“I find it funny that you denigrate something that is demonstrably and provably correct and effective.”
i am not denigrating i am sharing the Truth about who is behind these messages. And some of the far out views presented there.
There is another here on Renegade that is well acquainted with you and yours.
And i do know the Real Name. Not sure your quite there yet.

Last edited 4 years ago by a follower
1776
4 years ago
Reply to  a follower

I have never met anyone here, unfortunately. But it is odd that you seem to think that this restoration of our Lawful Government emanates from Anna.

You seem to think that the tens of thousands of us that have taken up the arduous task of restoration are somehow following one woman. We aren’t. Anna and a few other brave and dedicated souls did the initial digging.

You clearly do not “know me.”

But I suppose we shall see how things play out in the next few years.

And your final line was sufficient to reveal much about you.

Robert Housholder
Robert Housholder
4 years ago

She is right on and right never give up your guns to no one period” ” I RECKON NOT” 🙂

GUY W NICHOLLS
GUY W NICHOLLS
4 years ago

What about the fact that the police can’t be everywhere. They rarely appear on the scene while a crime is in progress.
They show up after it happened.