A Good Analysis

We should feel the same way about the democrats. However, I don’t think anyone here is suggesting we “eliminate” Iran. Disarm? Yes. When a person threatens death to someone else with a firearm in this country, law enforcement quite frequently disarms that person, and may incarcerate them, (depending on how important that person who was threatened is, of course). We don’t KILL people who merely say they are going to kill someone else, but we frequently take away their ability to do it. If Israel is certain Iran is building nukes, AND Iran has threatened Israel with annihilation for decades, I do not think it’s unreasonable for Israel to proactively disarm Iran. They would be stupid not to.

I do not think it unreasonable for ANY nation to proactively disarm any other nation that actively threatens annihilation, although I also understand the concept of “do not fire until and unless fired upon”. For a small nation like Israel, that may not work… for the United States, perhaps it does, although it still poses a tremendous risk to life and property. Having said that, this is, and should be Israel’s war. Now, if we determine, and it can be proven to the American people (good luck with that anymore) that Iran has a container ship with a nuclear missile launcher off the coast of New York… well, maybe not New York… Washington DC… well, maybe not DC either… hmmm…

Ann Vandersteel is not wrong about the democrats. We may yet have to “disarm” them with extreme prejudice. My point is that two things can be true at the same time.