If

If the drones over New Jersey are actually trying to detect radioactivity released from an old Ukrainian nuclear warhead:

  1. Why would President-elect Trump tell people to shoot them down? Is he not being briefed on national security matters?
  2. Matt Bracken has made a cogent case that nuclear warheads require maintenance that an old Ukrainian warhead would not have received. Best case in his mind would be a dirty bomb.
  3. Why is the Biden regime lying about the drones being US military drones? Does the government not want to panic the people or are they preparing a false flag operation to start WWIII?
  4. What if another state actor like Iran actually has an active nuclear warhead in the US?

As always in a repressive regime, there is more misdirection and lies than the truth. It would be prudent for people to take some measures to prepare for a false flag attack to launch WWIII prior to Trump’s inauguration. In the meantime, I am going to celebrate Christmas for the right reasons and say prayers asking the Lord to bless our people.

David DeGerolamo

    
Plugin by: PHP Freelancer
This entry was posted in Editorial. Bookmark the permalink.
5 1 vote
Article Rating
27 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom hedin
Tom hedin
1 month ago

Amen to that!!

Diva of Dance
Diva of Dance
1 month ago

I would suspect that the Biden regime will not inform Trump of anything and will probably hide the key to the White House front door!!!

tom finley
tom finley
1 month ago
Reply to  Diva of Dance

That is my belief as well, remember that the intel agencies hate President Trump, there are no good guys in globohomo.gov.

Joe Blow
Joe Blow
1 month ago
Reply to  tom finley

Look what Traitor Milley did when Trump was IN office. Of course they’ll do worse before he gets in.
I’ve little doubt they are trying to foment WW3 before inauguration, and a false-flag op is right out of the playbook.

tom finley
tom finley
1 month ago
Reply to  Joe Blow

Yea, poopy pants said it will be an orderly transition, we know different.

General 'Buck' Turgidson
General 'Buck' Turgidson
1 month ago
Reply to  Diva of Dance

Trump this time is NOT PARTICIPATING in any intel briefings before taking office--due to the fact that last time it was weaponized against him.

Kathleen
Kathleen
1 month ago

God is in control, but I do hate this obfuscation.

Al Buckner
Al Buckner
1 month ago

Why do I get the feeling that ‘black hats’ are involved.
Remember some of the military leaders don’t care for Trump.
Remember January 20th is soon approaching and I for one will
be relieved when that day is done and no attempts or major disruption
occurs.
Continue to pray for President Trump and our nation….

Bad_Brad
Bad_Brad
1 month ago

David
#1 Was my very first question.
#2 Very logical answer.
#3 They may not be U.S. military. If they are sniffers they may belong to some Nuclear Regulatory board. And if they are sniffing for a dirty bomb the last people they would want to know about it is us. This is probably the most logical answer..
#4 Thanks to the people that pull the sock puppets strings that certainly a possibility
There’s a number 5. That there are no drones. They could be holograms. That technology does exist. .Shawn Ryan did a great interview with a guy on Project Blue Beam. If you can find it, it’s worth the 30 minutes. Why would they project drones all around Jersey? Who knows. It’s be interesting to see if they disappear on January 19th. If they don’t we have some real problems on our hands.

TakeAHardLook
TakeAHardLook
1 month ago
Reply to  Bad_Brad

There was a theory sometime after 9/11 wherein the case was made for holographic projection of planes hitting the WTC; lots of very unusual/spotty/fractured/re-edited video from that event.
Plus, a jet hitting the WTC would not have been able to penetrate to the other side; it would have shredded shortly upon impact.
Oh, well…….

Last edited 1 month ago by TakeAHardLook
TakeAHardLook
TakeAHardLook
1 month ago

Recall when George “W” Bush entered The White House after the Clintonista scumbags.
They removed every single “W” from the keyboards of every computer in TWH and the West Wing.
This expensive and disgusting maliciousness was thought to be cute and quite the thing.
Just what one would expect from The Party of Scumbags.
Watch for much more “enemy action” before 20 JAN ’25.

nines
nines
1 month ago

THE person to know about the Ukraine nukes would be Scott Ritter. He’d be hollering his head off right now if there were ANY veracity to that claim.
I believe he was even personally involved with the transfer of the Soviet nukes on Ukraine territory back to Russia.
The ONLY scenario that makes ANY sense to me is setting up for a false flag, either with suitcase nukes or with one of our OWN missing nukes. It’s been so long since I was on that problem like white on rice, I can’t remember how many still missing there were when I had to give up before I couldn’t grow back the hair I was tearing out.
And, if it were a warhead, from anywhere else, OR a suitcase nuke, from anywhere else, the drones would’ve found it already.

kevsh
kevsh
1 month ago
Reply to  nines

Not unless the device was well shielded in lead cased crate. If a entity wants to hide something its not impossible.

Roth Harbard
1 month ago

“It would be prudent for people to take some measures to prepare for a false flag attack to launch WWIII prior to Trump’s inauguration.”

While I’m well beyond the age where they could draft me, I would only, and suggest everyone else only, pick up a rifle and fight to defend my country in my country, not far off in some distant land. So, don’t believe anything they tell us about some foreign country doing something evil here that causes us to go there. At this point everyone should know that the real enemy is in DC, not Russia, not Iran, not China.

Imagine how much better off America would be if over the past 100 years we’d kept our noses out of everyone else’s business and saved our blood and treasure for North America. How many of our sons, and daughters, who perished may have done great things? All the billion/trillions wasted killing and destroying applied here at home would have given us a near utopia.

Noway2
Noway2
1 month ago
Reply to  Roth Harbard

Amen.

Steady Steve
Steady Steve
1 month ago

I really hope it’s not a nuke or dirty bomb, but next year does start with WTF….

Swrichmond
Swrichmond
1 month ago

It’s my undetstanding the actual problem with hydrogen bombs and maintenance is the radioactive decay of the tritium which is used for fueling the thermonuclear reaction. Fuel is lithium deuteride and lithium tritide, the deuterium and tritium providing the heavy and superheavy hydrogen nucleii which will fuse into helium and release fusion energy. The D-T fusion is the easiest one to achieve. The tritium has a half life of 12 years, and over time the fuel mixture degrades to the point where yield is reduced and can become unreliable. The trigger which drives the fusion reaction is a convetional fission bomb which detonates first.

This is why a test ban treaty is such a big deal. You pull weapons out of inventory, rebuild them because you have to, and then test to make sure they still work, proving your maintenance process. Not testing? Hmmmmm, do they work after maintenance?

The descriptions of this online are grotesquely inadequate, or perhaps my knowledge is either dated or incorrect.

Known Associate
Known Associate
1 month ago

If you have been following the NY Post coverage of the drone FALSE FLAG, you have seen the following screen shot:

https://nypost.com/2024/12/15/us-news/expert-fears-drones-are-a-smokescreen-by-a-foreign-power/

A casual inspection of the image appears to show the outline of the typical Bell chopper flown by TV news, local LE, etc. As POGO would remind, it is US.

Channeling ORSON WELLES anyone?

It’s nothing but a flying squirrel to distract us from something more impactful that will soon emerge from a deep state sleeve.

Put on your X-Ray glasses everyone!

Known Associate

General 'Buck' Turgidson
General 'Buck' Turgidson
1 month ago

First off… President Trump claimed that he is not receiving intel briefings prior to taking office this time, because the last time it was weaponized against him on different levels. So I would say he is out of the loop.

As for old Ukrainian nukes--there are out there ‘old Ukrainian’ nuclear weapons technicians still milling about and if you know these people, they will prostitute themselves for a buck. And I might add-that the maintenance on such weapons, seeing that they are Russian in design, are not that hard to maintain and make work again.

Lastly--imagine the public reaction if some dunce in the Whitehouse made a public statement that ‘there are nuclear weapons that have been smuggled into the USA’ and we are currently searching for them with radiation detecting drones. What would be the reaction?

Answer: TOTAL CHAOS AND PANIC.

First off, the stock market would plummet and loose trillions in capitalization --and no matter what, the financial system must be protected at all costs--even at the cost of your lives. Also--imagine the stampede out of the major eastern cities. Imagine the interstates choked. Look at that movie ‘Deep Impact’ in the last scene before the comet hits. Yeah--that’s what it would look like And lastly--it would mean the literal downfall of the US government’s credibility on every level imaginable. The open borders thing would be to blame--and there would be a demand to deport ALL illegal foreigners Ghengis Kahn style, replete with people going door to door with torches and pitchforks (a happy thought by the way).

And a final thought--if such a weapon exists and is used, most likely they/them in DC have all the evidence primed and ready to release, all the intel lined up real neat like in a convincing manner (like the babies being disconnected in the first sandbox war) that blames Iran for the deed. And most of the dunderheads in the USA will believe it. Most of the zipper-headed, a$$-wipe conservatives will lap up the propaganda gruel that will be served on FOX and Hannity. And they will line up to march off to war like lemmings clapping their flippers like trained seals on command.

They’re keeping their card close to their vest BECAUSE YOU CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH.

Last edited 1 month ago by General 'Buck' Turgidson
Survivormann99
Survivormann99
1 month ago

Last night, I watched the Canadian Prepper YouTube video in which he asked the question about whether the drones were actually government drones that were looking for nuclear devices.
In the 1980s, I first learned of NEST (Nuclear Emergency Search Teams) teams from a novel I read. The concept wasn’t fiction. NEST teams were a THING even then. At that time, these teams were composed of federal employees who held normal federal jobs they could leave when ordered to do so. These people would man vans full of sophisticated equipment that could detect nuclear weapons that might be secreted in US cities as part of a terror attack. In that novel, “Fifth Horseman,” Muammar Gaddafi had sent a nuclear weapon in a sea-land container to the US. It had been off-loaded routinely and sent to a New Jersey warehouse where it would remain until the command signal was sent. There was a race to find it before it was detonated. Spoiler Alert: they found it.

It is no great leap to understand that vans with sophisticated technology searching for drones in Manhattan or Neward would be replaced/augmented by drones today.

Canadian Prepper mentioned the possibility of drones now being used to locate a dirty bomb that has been secretly shipped into the US. Iran has been “on the verge of having a nuclear weapons within days” for two or three years now, if not more. Yet, as you probably know, a dirty bomb doesn’t involve nuclear fission, much less nuclear fusion. It is simply a conventional bomb that explodes and sends radioactive material into the wind. The particles settle on, say, an urban area, and the radioactive material causes casualties and renders the area uninhabitable for decades. (Think the Chernobly Exclusion Zone, no nuclear bomb was involved, just radioactive contamination.)

In 2005, HBO made a movie about a dirty bomb attack on London, “Dirty War,” an attack carried out by Muslim extremists (who else?). You can still watch the movie on “MAX.”

The current concern is that, if there is a dirty bomb that is loose in the country now, Washington won’t tell us because of fear that the population will run from the cities in a panic. True. Therefore, the government finds it more useful (and less trouble) to keep us in the dark.

All I’m saying is that this is an interesting explanation for what is happening. Time will tell whether it is legitimate.

In order to disrupt your sleep pattern for the next couple of nights, I will mention that Sarah Adams, a former CIA analyst and the person who advised Congress in the investigation of the Benghazi debacle inquiry, among many other matters, was recently interviewed on YouTube’s Shawn Ryan Show (on which Donald Trump, J.D. Vance, Tucker Carlson, and a number of other luminaries have also been interviewed). She says that she is “100% positive” that “1,000 plus” highly trained Al Qaeda fighters are currently in the US and are waiting for the order to commence attacks on the population and infrastructure in 2025.

This risk of terrorist attack has been discussed since the borders were thrown wide open by Dementia Joe. Now, it appears that the disaster may be visited on the country soon.

kevsh
kevsh
1 month ago
Reply to  Survivormann99

Actually, a dirty bomb can consist of two different varieties. The first concept you mentioned with conventional explosives, which would not be very efficient. The second would be using some sort of material that is reactive with plutonium, one of the materials is beryllium. Louis Slotin is a physicist that was using beryllium in an experiment to test the criticality of plutonium. The experiment went wrong Slotin received massive doses of radiation his co workers did too, but most of his friends were further away from the experiment when the accident occurred. Slotins quick reaction saved the whole area from severe contamination. When I think of a efficient dirty bomb this incident comes to mind. You know and I know this is the the method the perpetrators would use, it causes massive damage and the home work has already been done for the perpetrators. If they can shield the device with enough lead, its possible the bad actors could transport the device without being detected, until the last moment.

Thexrayboy
Thexrayboy
1 month ago

The only thing we can be certain of regarding these drones is we are NOT being told the truth.

Noway2
Noway2
1 month ago

Just a technical observation. I work in the utility industry and where I’m at we have a fairly sophisticated SCADA system. We work closely with engineering reps from companies like Schneider Electric who make PLCs/DCS equipment and SCADA software packages. Over a decade ago, one of the reps made a comment about one of the bigger customers being the USG in using equipment to scan for radiological materials at border crossings. Just something to keep in mind; that this is not new, though the threat may currently be elevated.

Mary Combs
Mary Combs
1 month ago

A few thoughts that are different from the ones already expressed here -- I used to read all the Q decodes, but was not good at deciphering the ‘comms’ myself. Trump’s message had two words with missing letters. I suspect that was a coded message to someone. Second, his message distances him from whatever the other side is up to. In some visceral level I can’t really explain, it was somewhat comforting; my gut relaxed a bit on reading his message. He didn’t say to the people ‘shoot it down’, he said to officialdom ‘you know what’s going on, tell the people -- if you don’t know what’s going on, ‘shoot it down’. That immediately branded this as a government operation. Many people would have seen that logic for themselves, but there are more dunces out there than I used to imagine -and it would have set them thinking along the right lines (eg it’s not an et).

Mary Combs
Mary Combs
1 month ago

It’s worth going through the comments to this thread: https://x.com/jimfergusonuk/status/1868306408950612343?s=46&t=Hv5M9yqWIch4zh8qG1K21w

Hammers Thor
1 month ago
  1. Pressure tactic against the regime.
  2. Even the best case scenario, which Bracken is most likely correct, is still a potential disaster, not just from the radiation but from the panic, clogged streets (where everyone trapped in their car is a potential target) and the complete loss of trust in the government.
  3. Layers within layers. This is a psyop, intended to rattle us, confuse us, cause all sorts of theories to come out thus diluting whatever reasonable explanations might also be out there. If they are looking for radioactive material, this is a crisis, and you never let a good crisis go to waste.
  4. This is by far my biggest fear, as there are certainly ways to shield the nuclear payload from detection.

Going to get familiar with my GQ Electronics GMC-300E straight away.